重症监护室中无休克的急性心力衰竭患者动脉内导管插入术与死亡率之间的关系:回顾性研究

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yide Li , Yuan Zhu , Le Fu , Liang Luo , Yingfang She
{"title":"重症监护室中无休克的急性心力衰竭患者动脉内导管插入术与死亡率之间的关系:回顾性研究","authors":"Yide Li ,&nbsp;Yuan Zhu ,&nbsp;Le Fu ,&nbsp;Liang Luo ,&nbsp;Yingfang She","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Acute heart failure necessitates intensive care, and arterial catheterization is a commonly performed invasive procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to investigate the association between arterial catheterization and outcomes in acute heart failure patients without shock.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilized MIMIC-IV database records for acute heart failure patients at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2008 to 2019. Employing doubly robust estimation, we examined the relationship between arterial catheterization and outcomes, including 28-day, 90-day, in-hospital mortality, and ICU-free days within 28 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 6936 patients identified, 2078 met inclusion criteria; 347 underwent arterial catheterization during their ICU stay. We observed no significant difference in 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.61, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.31–1.21, <em>P</em> = 0.155), though catheterization was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.41, 95 % CI: 0.14–0.65, <em>P</em> = 0.02). No significant effects were observed on 90-day mortality or ICU-free days within 28 days.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that arterial catheterization is not associated with 28- and 90-day mortality rates in acute heart failure patients without shock but is linked to lower in-hospital mortality. Additional research and consensus are required to determine the appropriate utilization of arterial catheterization in patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000752/pdfft?md5=172b21c029aad1e0d48de2764cb0c699&pid=1-s2.0-S2666602224000752-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between intra-arterial catheterization and mortality of acute heart failure patients without shock in ICU: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Yide Li ,&nbsp;Yuan Zhu ,&nbsp;Le Fu ,&nbsp;Liang Luo ,&nbsp;Yingfang She\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Acute heart failure necessitates intensive care, and arterial catheterization is a commonly performed invasive procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to investigate the association between arterial catheterization and outcomes in acute heart failure patients without shock.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilized MIMIC-IV database records for acute heart failure patients at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2008 to 2019. Employing doubly robust estimation, we examined the relationship between arterial catheterization and outcomes, including 28-day, 90-day, in-hospital mortality, and ICU-free days within 28 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 6936 patients identified, 2078 met inclusion criteria; 347 underwent arterial catheterization during their ICU stay. We observed no significant difference in 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.61, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.31–1.21, <em>P</em> = 0.155), though catheterization was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.41, 95 % CI: 0.14–0.65, <em>P</em> = 0.02). No significant effects were observed on 90-day mortality or ICU-free days within 28 days.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that arterial catheterization is not associated with 28- and 90-day mortality rates in acute heart failure patients without shock but is linked to lower in-hospital mortality. Additional research and consensus are required to determine the appropriate utilization of arterial catheterization in patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000752/pdfft?md5=172b21c029aad1e0d48de2764cb0c699&pid=1-s2.0-S2666602224000752-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景急性心力衰竭需要重症监护,而动脉导管插入术是重症监护室(ICU)中常用的侵入性手术。我们旨在研究动脉导管插入术与无休克急性心衰患者预后之间的关系。方法我们利用了贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心 2008 年至 2019 年急性心衰患者的 MIMIC-IV 数据库记录。通过双重稳健估计,我们研究了动脉导管插入术与预后之间的关系,包括 28 天、90 天、院内死亡率和 28 天内无 ICU 天数。结果在确定的 6936 例患者中,2078 例符合纳入标准;347 例患者在入住 ICU 期间接受了动脉导管插入术。我们观察到,虽然导管插入术与院内死亡率降低有关(OR:0.41,95% 置信区间:0.14-0.65,P = 0.02),但在 28 天死亡率方面无明显差异(几率比 [OR]:0.61,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.31-1.21,P = 0.155)。结论我们的研究结果表明,动脉导管插入术与无休克急性心衰患者的 28 天和 90 天死亡率无关,但与院内死亡率降低有关。需要进行更多的研究并达成共识,以确定在患者中适当使用动脉导管术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between intra-arterial catheterization and mortality of acute heart failure patients without shock in ICU: A retrospective study

Background

Acute heart failure necessitates intensive care, and arterial catheterization is a commonly performed invasive procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to investigate the association between arterial catheterization and outcomes in acute heart failure patients without shock.

Methods

We utilized MIMIC-IV database records for acute heart failure patients at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2008 to 2019. Employing doubly robust estimation, we examined the relationship between arterial catheterization and outcomes, including 28-day, 90-day, in-hospital mortality, and ICU-free days within 28 days.

Results

Of 6936 patients identified, 2078 met inclusion criteria; 347 underwent arterial catheterization during their ICU stay. We observed no significant difference in 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.61, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.31–1.21, P = 0.155), though catheterization was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.41, 95 % CI: 0.14–0.65, P = 0.02). No significant effects were observed on 90-day mortality or ICU-free days within 28 days.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that arterial catheterization is not associated with 28- and 90-day mortality rates in acute heart failure patients without shock but is linked to lower in-hospital mortality. Additional research and consensus are required to determine the appropriate utilization of arterial catheterization in patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信