利用再利用材料实现高效建筑的优化目标,打造循环型建筑环境

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Matthew Gordon, Catherine De Wolf
{"title":"利用再利用材料实现高效建筑的优化目标,打造循环型建筑环境","authors":"Matthew Gordon,&nbsp;Catherine De Wolf","doi":"10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Building materials that are reused in a circular economy context are often non-standard because previous usage has altered their original properties. Material matching algorithms aid design and construction by matching components in stock with those needed in a design. The efficiency of these matches is assessed based on factors such as waste, logistics, and structural applicability. In this paper, we evaluate the efficacy and practicality for design evolution of construction-relevant optimisation goals. We evaluate goals based on their construction-time and design time results, using a software pipeline optimising both the mapping and design. One design was also constructed based on the optimised matching, to assess additional considerations when working component-specific designs. Based on difficulties and inefficiencies observed during fabrication, we propose two alternate matching strategies and compare their effects on the chosen factors. The study reveals that component allocation systems frequently overlook the need for both contingency planning and redundancy in the construction process. Additionally, inaccuracies in inventory tracking can significantly compromise the feasibility of the planned design. The stability of these design assistive techniques strongly affects their ability to be applied in large-volume projects. This implies the need for a new set of objective factors to be incorporated into existing methods of design optimisation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34137,"journal":{"name":"Developments in the Built Environment","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100509"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266616592400190X/pdfft?md5=9c02a8b4655e40e6637664d7c2579696&pid=1-s2.0-S266616592400190X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimisation goals for efficient construction from reused materials towards a circular built environment\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Gordon,&nbsp;Catherine De Wolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Building materials that are reused in a circular economy context are often non-standard because previous usage has altered their original properties. Material matching algorithms aid design and construction by matching components in stock with those needed in a design. The efficiency of these matches is assessed based on factors such as waste, logistics, and structural applicability. In this paper, we evaluate the efficacy and practicality for design evolution of construction-relevant optimisation goals. We evaluate goals based on their construction-time and design time results, using a software pipeline optimising both the mapping and design. One design was also constructed based on the optimised matching, to assess additional considerations when working component-specific designs. Based on difficulties and inefficiencies observed during fabrication, we propose two alternate matching strategies and compare their effects on the chosen factors. The study reveals that component allocation systems frequently overlook the need for both contingency planning and redundancy in the construction process. Additionally, inaccuracies in inventory tracking can significantly compromise the feasibility of the planned design. The stability of these design assistive techniques strongly affects their ability to be applied in large-volume projects. This implies the need for a new set of objective factors to be incorporated into existing methods of design optimisation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developments in the Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266616592400190X/pdfft?md5=9c02a8b4655e40e6637664d7c2579696&pid=1-s2.0-S266616592400190X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developments in the Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266616592400190X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266616592400190X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在循环经济背景下被重复使用的建筑材料通常是非标准材料,因为之前的使用改变了它们的原始属性。材料匹配算法可将库存部件与设计所需部件进行匹配,从而帮助设计和施工。这些匹配的效率根据废物、物流和结构适用性等因素进行评估。在本文中,我们将评估与施工相关的优化目标在设计演进中的有效性和实用性。我们根据施工时间和设计时间的结果对目标进行评估,并使用软件管道对绘图和设计进行优化。我们还在优化匹配的基础上构建了一个设计,以评估在进行特定组件设计时需要考虑的其他因素。根据在制造过程中观察到的困难和低效率,我们提出了两种不同的匹配策略,并比较了它们对所选因素的影响。研究表明,组件分配系统经常忽略施工过程中对应急计划和冗余的需求。此外,库存跟踪的不准确也会大大影响计划设计的可行性。这些辅助设计技术的稳定性严重影响了它们在大工程项目中的应用能力。这就意味着需要在现有的设计优化方法中加入一套新的目标因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimisation goals for efficient construction from reused materials towards a circular built environment

Building materials that are reused in a circular economy context are often non-standard because previous usage has altered their original properties. Material matching algorithms aid design and construction by matching components in stock with those needed in a design. The efficiency of these matches is assessed based on factors such as waste, logistics, and structural applicability. In this paper, we evaluate the efficacy and practicality for design evolution of construction-relevant optimisation goals. We evaluate goals based on their construction-time and design time results, using a software pipeline optimising both the mapping and design. One design was also constructed based on the optimised matching, to assess additional considerations when working component-specific designs. Based on difficulties and inefficiencies observed during fabrication, we propose two alternate matching strategies and compare their effects on the chosen factors. The study reveals that component allocation systems frequently overlook the need for both contingency planning and redundancy in the construction process. Additionally, inaccuracies in inventory tracking can significantly compromise the feasibility of the planned design. The stability of these design assistive techniques strongly affects their ability to be applied in large-volume projects. This implies the need for a new set of objective factors to be incorporated into existing methods of design optimisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Developments in the Built Environment (DIBE) is a recently established peer-reviewed gold open access journal, ensuring that all accepted articles are permanently and freely accessible. Focused on civil engineering and the built environment, DIBE publishes original papers and short communications. Encompassing topics such as construction materials and building sustainability, the journal adopts a holistic approach with the aim of benefiting the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信