{"title":"中国渔业保险政策的三维分析:工具-方向-主体视角","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Insurance for fisheries ensures the stability of fishing areas and stabilizes fishermen's lives. This research, derived from a numerical examination of 374 documents on China's fishery insurance policies, delves into the emphasis and limitations of current policies, offering guidance for developing and refining future fishery insurance strategies for both China and the globe.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The research develops a 3D analytical model encompassing policy instruments, directions, and stakeholders, examining how China's fishery insurance policies are distributed and utilized via classification of policy tools, coding of text content, statistical analysis, and complex interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Regarding policy instruments, those based on environmental considerations were the most commonly employed, while those based on demand were the least utilized. In terms of policy direction, it is biased towards supporting strategies such as organizing and implementing work and optimizing insurance operation mechanism. In terms of policy stakeholders, it is mostly reflected in the characteristics of policy implementation under the leadership of the government, while the initiative and participation of fishermen, fishery management organizations and insurance management institutions is not high enough.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Going forward, both China and the global community ought to focus on these three aspects when developing fishery insurance policies. First, it's essential to broaden the impact of policy instruments that are based on demand and supply. Second, refine the policy tool guidance measures based on policy direction. Third, it is necessary to stimulate the vitality of policy-driven multi-agent participation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-dimensional analysis of China's fisheries insurance policy: A tool-direction-subject perspective\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Insurance for fisheries ensures the stability of fishing areas and stabilizes fishermen's lives. This research, derived from a numerical examination of 374 documents on China's fishery insurance policies, delves into the emphasis and limitations of current policies, offering guidance for developing and refining future fishery insurance strategies for both China and the globe.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The research develops a 3D analytical model encompassing policy instruments, directions, and stakeholders, examining how China's fishery insurance policies are distributed and utilized via classification of policy tools, coding of text content, statistical analysis, and complex interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Regarding policy instruments, those based on environmental considerations were the most commonly employed, while those based on demand were the least utilized. In terms of policy direction, it is biased towards supporting strategies such as organizing and implementing work and optimizing insurance operation mechanism. In terms of policy stakeholders, it is mostly reflected in the characteristics of policy implementation under the leadership of the government, while the initiative and participation of fishermen, fishery management organizations and insurance management institutions is not high enough.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Going forward, both China and the global community ought to focus on these three aspects when developing fishery insurance policies. First, it's essential to broaden the impact of policy instruments that are based on demand and supply. Second, refine the policy tool guidance measures based on policy direction. Third, it is necessary to stimulate the vitality of policy-driven multi-agent participation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24003282\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24003282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Three-dimensional analysis of China's fisheries insurance policy: A tool-direction-subject perspective
Objective
Insurance for fisheries ensures the stability of fishing areas and stabilizes fishermen's lives. This research, derived from a numerical examination of 374 documents on China's fishery insurance policies, delves into the emphasis and limitations of current policies, offering guidance for developing and refining future fishery insurance strategies for both China and the globe.
Methods
The research develops a 3D analytical model encompassing policy instruments, directions, and stakeholders, examining how China's fishery insurance policies are distributed and utilized via classification of policy tools, coding of text content, statistical analysis, and complex interactions.
Results
Regarding policy instruments, those based on environmental considerations were the most commonly employed, while those based on demand were the least utilized. In terms of policy direction, it is biased towards supporting strategies such as organizing and implementing work and optimizing insurance operation mechanism. In terms of policy stakeholders, it is mostly reflected in the characteristics of policy implementation under the leadership of the government, while the initiative and participation of fishermen, fishery management organizations and insurance management institutions is not high enough.
Conclusion
Going forward, both China and the global community ought to focus on these three aspects when developing fishery insurance policies. First, it's essential to broaden the impact of policy instruments that are based on demand and supply. Second, refine the policy tool guidance measures based on policy direction. Third, it is necessary to stimulate the vitality of policy-driven multi-agent participation.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.