农村信贷的经济影响:按生物群落对巴西全国家庭农业强化计划的分析

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Rafael Faria de Abreu Campos , Édson Paulo Domingues , Aline Souza Magalhães , Tarik Marques do Prado Tanure
{"title":"农村信贷的经济影响:按生物群落对巴西全国家庭农业强化计划的分析","authors":"Rafael Faria de Abreu Campos ,&nbsp;Édson Paulo Domingues ,&nbsp;Aline Souza Magalhães ,&nbsp;Tarik Marques do Prado Tanure","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to assess the economic impacts of the National Family Farming Strengthening Program (Pronaf) in the various Brazilian biomes. The impacts at the sectoral, regional, and macroeconomic levels, arising from increases in rural credit to farmers in Brazilian territory – family and non-family farmers separately considered –, are carried out using the Computable General Equilibrium model, TERM-Biomas, specially built for analysis of the rural sectors in the Brazilian biomes. The key conclusion is that all regions of the model win, in the most varied magnitudes. Regions with higher participation in family farming production earn more than others. Up to the year 2020, some regions – from the Caatinga biome – show comparative losses. This may be because traditionally family farming regions would have their demands for primary factors more drastically increased, investments and jobs migrate, for example, from those regions of Caatinga. When the results are analyzed in a wider time limit, however, the results suggest general gains. The more vulnerable and specialized in family farming sectors are the regions, the greater the gains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"16 10","pages":"Article 100115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003172/pdfft?md5=a7b13fecc1c7158278e4697c35815ccc&pid=1-s2.0-S1757780224003172-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic impacts of the rural credit: An analysis of the Brazilian National Family Farming Strengthening Program by biome\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Faria de Abreu Campos ,&nbsp;Édson Paulo Domingues ,&nbsp;Aline Souza Magalhães ,&nbsp;Tarik Marques do Prado Tanure\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aims to assess the economic impacts of the National Family Farming Strengthening Program (Pronaf) in the various Brazilian biomes. The impacts at the sectoral, regional, and macroeconomic levels, arising from increases in rural credit to farmers in Brazilian territory – family and non-family farmers separately considered –, are carried out using the Computable General Equilibrium model, TERM-Biomas, specially built for analysis of the rural sectors in the Brazilian biomes. The key conclusion is that all regions of the model win, in the most varied magnitudes. Regions with higher participation in family farming production earn more than others. Up to the year 2020, some regions – from the Caatinga biome – show comparative losses. This may be because traditionally family farming regions would have their demands for primary factors more drastically increased, investments and jobs migrate, for example, from those regions of Caatinga. When the results are analyzed in a wider time limit, however, the results suggest general gains. The more vulnerable and specialized in family farming sectors are the regions, the greater the gains.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Science Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 100115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003172/pdfft?md5=a7b13fecc1c7158278e4697c35815ccc&pid=1-s2.0-S1757780224003172-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Science Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估国家加强家庭农业计划(Pronaf)对巴西各生物群落的经济影响。利用专门为分析巴西各生物群落农村部门而建立的可计算一般均衡模型 TERM-Biomas,对巴西境内农民(家庭和非家庭农民分别考虑)增加农村信贷在部门、地区和宏观经济层面产生的影响进行了研究。主要结论是,模型中的所有地区都赢了,而且赢的幅度最大。家庭农业生产参与率较高的地区比其他地区收入更高。到 2020 年,一些地区(来自卡廷加生物群落)显示出相对损失。这可能是因为传统的家庭农业地区对初级要素的需求将大幅增加,投资和工作机会将从卡廷加地区等地转移。不过,如果从更广的时间范围来分析,结果表明总体上是有利的。家庭农业部门越脆弱、越专业的地区,收益就越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The economic impacts of the rural credit: An analysis of the Brazilian National Family Farming Strengthening Program by biome

This study aims to assess the economic impacts of the National Family Farming Strengthening Program (Pronaf) in the various Brazilian biomes. The impacts at the sectoral, regional, and macroeconomic levels, arising from increases in rural credit to farmers in Brazilian territory – family and non-family farmers separately considered –, are carried out using the Computable General Equilibrium model, TERM-Biomas, specially built for analysis of the rural sectors in the Brazilian biomes. The key conclusion is that all regions of the model win, in the most varied magnitudes. Regions with higher participation in family farming production earn more than others. Up to the year 2020, some regions – from the Caatinga biome – show comparative losses. This may be because traditionally family farming regions would have their demands for primary factors more drastically increased, investments and jobs migrate, for example, from those regions of Caatinga. When the results are analyzed in a wider time limit, however, the results suggest general gains. The more vulnerable and specialized in family farming sectors are the regions, the greater the gains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信