使用优化的紫外线-C LED 配置进行高接触表面消毒的多变量比较分析

{"title":"使用优化的紫外线-C LED 配置进行高接触表面消毒的多变量比较分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.heha.2024.100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>UV light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have been regarded as feasible alternatives for traditional UV lamps since the early 2000s, owing to their improved safety features, environmental advantages, and efficiency. Because of the inherent challenges associated with lower intensity of LEDs over extended distances, our findings demonstrated the optimized disinfection efficiency using various LED setups. This study evaluated the antimicrobial effectiveness of single, six, and eight-LED configurations against <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (<em>S. aureus</em>), specifically emphasizing attaining the utmost disinfection efficiency within an extended range of up to 60 cm. With an 8-LED configuration, the study achieved a substantial reduction of 6.10×10<sup>4</sup> CFU/mL from an initial level of 5.20×10<sup>9</sup> CFU/mL, corresponding to 4.9-log<sub>10</sub> inactivation, requiring a dose of 264 µJ-cm<sup>−2</sup>. 2.9-log<sub>10</sub> inactivation was achieved using a 6-LED, yielding lower yet comparable efficiency requiring 192 µJ-cm<sup>−2</sup> of dose. However, with 60 µJ-cm<sup>−2</sup> of dose, a single LED could only reduce the bacterial burden from the initial level to merely 0.2-log<sub>10</sub> inactivation, corresponding to 2.9 × 10<sup>9</sup> CFU/mL, under similar exposure settings. In conclusion, UV-LEDs show promise for disinfection, with LED configuration and distance significantly impacting their efficiency, holding perspective for various applications, particularly within healthcare facilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73269,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277304922400014X/pdfft?md5=4ada6873c8640341da8ccf8af922dfad&pid=1-s2.0-S277304922400014X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative multivariate analysis for high-touch surface disinfection using optimized ultraviolet-C LEDs configuration\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heha.2024.100101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>UV light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have been regarded as feasible alternatives for traditional UV lamps since the early 2000s, owing to their improved safety features, environmental advantages, and efficiency. Because of the inherent challenges associated with lower intensity of LEDs over extended distances, our findings demonstrated the optimized disinfection efficiency using various LED setups. This study evaluated the antimicrobial effectiveness of single, six, and eight-LED configurations against <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (<em>S. aureus</em>), specifically emphasizing attaining the utmost disinfection efficiency within an extended range of up to 60 cm. With an 8-LED configuration, the study achieved a substantial reduction of 6.10×10<sup>4</sup> CFU/mL from an initial level of 5.20×10<sup>9</sup> CFU/mL, corresponding to 4.9-log<sub>10</sub> inactivation, requiring a dose of 264 µJ-cm<sup>−2</sup>. 2.9-log<sub>10</sub> inactivation was achieved using a 6-LED, yielding lower yet comparable efficiency requiring 192 µJ-cm<sup>−2</sup> of dose. However, with 60 µJ-cm<sup>−2</sup> of dose, a single LED could only reduce the bacterial burden from the initial level to merely 0.2-log<sub>10</sub> inactivation, corresponding to 2.9 × 10<sup>9</sup> CFU/mL, under similar exposure settings. In conclusion, UV-LEDs show promise for disinfection, with LED configuration and distance significantly impacting their efficiency, holding perspective for various applications, particularly within healthcare facilities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hygiene and environmental health advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277304922400014X/pdfft?md5=4ada6873c8640341da8ccf8af922dfad&pid=1-s2.0-S277304922400014X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hygiene and environmental health advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277304922400014X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277304922400014X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 21 世纪初以来,紫外线发光二极管(LED)因其更好的安全性能、环境优势和效率,一直被视为传统紫外线灯的可行替代品。由于 LED 在较远距离上的强度较低,因此存在固有的挑战,我们的研究结果表明,使用不同的 LED 设置可以优化消毒效率。这项研究评估了单、六和八 LED 配置对金黄色葡萄球菌(S. aureus)的抗菌效果,特别强调要在长达 60 厘米的范围内达到最高消毒效率。使用 8 LED 配置时,研究结果表明,与最初的 5.20×109 CFU/mL 水平相比,CFU/mL 大幅减少了 6.10×104,相当于灭活了 4.9-log10,所需的剂量为 264 µJ-cm-2。使用 6 个 LED 可达到 2.9 对数 10 的灭活,效率较低,但与之相当,需要 192 µJ-cm-2 的剂量。然而,在类似的曝光设置下,使用 60 µJ-cm-2 的剂量时,单个 LED 只能将细菌负荷从初始水平降低到 0.2-log10 的灭活水平,相当于 2.9 × 109 CFU/mL。总之,紫外线-LED 在消毒方面大有可为,LED 的配置和距离对其效率有显著影响,具有各种应用前景,尤其是在医疗设施内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative multivariate analysis for high-touch surface disinfection using optimized ultraviolet-C LEDs configuration

Comparative multivariate analysis for high-touch surface disinfection using optimized ultraviolet-C LEDs configuration

UV light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have been regarded as feasible alternatives for traditional UV lamps since the early 2000s, owing to their improved safety features, environmental advantages, and efficiency. Because of the inherent challenges associated with lower intensity of LEDs over extended distances, our findings demonstrated the optimized disinfection efficiency using various LED setups. This study evaluated the antimicrobial effectiveness of single, six, and eight-LED configurations against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), specifically emphasizing attaining the utmost disinfection efficiency within an extended range of up to 60 cm. With an 8-LED configuration, the study achieved a substantial reduction of 6.10×104 CFU/mL from an initial level of 5.20×109 CFU/mL, corresponding to 4.9-log10 inactivation, requiring a dose of 264 µJ-cm−2. 2.9-log10 inactivation was achieved using a 6-LED, yielding lower yet comparable efficiency requiring 192 µJ-cm−2 of dose. However, with 60 µJ-cm−2 of dose, a single LED could only reduce the bacterial burden from the initial level to merely 0.2-log10 inactivation, corresponding to 2.9 × 109 CFU/mL, under similar exposure settings. In conclusion, UV-LEDs show promise for disinfection, with LED configuration and distance significantly impacting their efficiency, holding perspective for various applications, particularly within healthcare facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hygiene and environmental health advances
Hygiene and environmental health advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信