细粒土调节过程中泡沫破坏的定量分析

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
{"title":"细粒土调节过程中泡沫破坏的定量分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2024.105971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents the development of a novel methodology and the results of an experimental study to quantify foam destruction (<span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span>) observed during the conditioning of fine-grained soils. A laboratory setup was designed to simulate pressurized mixing conditions prevalent in the cutterhead tool gap and excavation chamber of an earth pressure balance tunnel boring machine (EPBM). The developed <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> quantification methodology utilizes the concept of back pressure saturation to determine the volume of the ruptured air from the foam bubbles during the conditioning of soil. The influence of major soil types, fines content (<span><math><mrow><mi>FC</mi></mrow></math></span>), soil consistency index (<span><math><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></math></span>), foam injection ratio (<span><math><mrow><mi>FIR</mi></mrow></math></span>), and foam liquid half-life (<span><math><msub><mi>t</mi><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) on <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> were investigated. The results showed no <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> in sand, 15–30% <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> (% of injected foam volume) in silt, and significant <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> of 30–85% in clay. <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> was found to be directly proportional to <span><math><mrow><mi>FC</mi></mrow></math></span> and inversely proportional to <span><math><mrow><mi>FIR</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>t</mi><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>. No relationship was observed between <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></math></span>. The study provides clear experimental evidence of the presence of <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> phenomena in fine-grained soils and a methodology for calculating <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span>. The quantification of <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> range in major soil types and insights into influencing factors revealed in this study will help practitioners account for the expected <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> in various soil types while deciding <span><math><mrow><mi>FIR</mi></mrow></math></span>, and decide whether to use foam at all while preparing conditioning strategies for EPB tunneling projects in fine-grained soils.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying foam destruction during conditioning of fine-grained soils\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2024.105971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents the development of a novel methodology and the results of an experimental study to quantify foam destruction (<span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span>) observed during the conditioning of fine-grained soils. A laboratory setup was designed to simulate pressurized mixing conditions prevalent in the cutterhead tool gap and excavation chamber of an earth pressure balance tunnel boring machine (EPBM). The developed <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> quantification methodology utilizes the concept of back pressure saturation to determine the volume of the ruptured air from the foam bubbles during the conditioning of soil. The influence of major soil types, fines content (<span><math><mrow><mi>FC</mi></mrow></math></span>), soil consistency index (<span><math><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></math></span>), foam injection ratio (<span><math><mrow><mi>FIR</mi></mrow></math></span>), and foam liquid half-life (<span><math><msub><mi>t</mi><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) on <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> were investigated. The results showed no <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> in sand, 15–30% <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> (% of injected foam volume) in silt, and significant <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> of 30–85% in clay. <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> was found to be directly proportional to <span><math><mrow><mi>FC</mi></mrow></math></span> and inversely proportional to <span><math><mrow><mi>FIR</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>t</mi><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>. No relationship was observed between <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></math></span>. The study provides clear experimental evidence of the presence of <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> phenomena in fine-grained soils and a methodology for calculating <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span>. The quantification of <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> range in major soil types and insights into influencing factors revealed in this study will help practitioners account for the expected <span><math><mrow><mi>FD</mi></mrow></math></span> in various soil types while deciding <span><math><mrow><mi>FIR</mi></mrow></math></span>, and decide whether to use foam at all while preparing conditioning strategies for EPB tunneling projects in fine-grained soils.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779824003894\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779824003894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一种新方法的开发过程和一项实验研究的结果,该方法用于量化细粒土调理过程中观察到的泡沫破坏(FD)。本文设计了一个实验室装置,用于模拟土压平衡隧道掘进机(EPBM)刀头工具间隙和挖掘室中普遍存在的加压混合条件。所开发的 FD 定量方法利用背压饱和概念来确定土壤调理过程中泡沫气泡破裂的空气量。研究了主要土壤类型、细粒含量 (FC)、土壤稠度指数 (Ic)、泡沫注入比 (FIR) 和泡沫液半衰期 (t1/2) 对 FD 的影响。结果表明,在砂土中没有 FD,在淤泥中 FD 为 15-30%(注入泡沫体积的百分比),在粘土中 FD 为 30-85%。FD 与 FC 成正比,与 FIR 和 t1/2 成反比。FD 与 Ic 之间没有关系。这项研究为细粒土中存在 FD 现象提供了明确的实验证据和计算 FD 的方法。本研究对主要土壤类型中的 FD 范围进行了量化,并对影响因素进行了深入分析,这将有助于从业人员在决定 FIR 时考虑各种土壤类型中的预期 FD,并在为细粒土中的 EPB 隧道项目制定调节策略时决定是否使用泡沫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying foam destruction during conditioning of fine-grained soils

This paper presents the development of a novel methodology and the results of an experimental study to quantify foam destruction (FD) observed during the conditioning of fine-grained soils. A laboratory setup was designed to simulate pressurized mixing conditions prevalent in the cutterhead tool gap and excavation chamber of an earth pressure balance tunnel boring machine (EPBM). The developed FD quantification methodology utilizes the concept of back pressure saturation to determine the volume of the ruptured air from the foam bubbles during the conditioning of soil. The influence of major soil types, fines content (FC), soil consistency index (Ic), foam injection ratio (FIR), and foam liquid half-life (t1/2) on FD were investigated. The results showed no FD in sand, 15–30% FD (% of injected foam volume) in silt, and significant FD of 30–85% in clay. FD was found to be directly proportional to FC and inversely proportional to FIR and t1/2. No relationship was observed between FD and Ic. The study provides clear experimental evidence of the presence of FD phenomena in fine-grained soils and a methodology for calculating FD. The quantification of FD range in major soil types and insights into influencing factors revealed in this study will help practitioners account for the expected FD in various soil types while deciding FIR, and decide whether to use foam at all while preparing conditioning strategies for EPB tunneling projects in fine-grained soils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信