健康信念模式构建与小学教师使用食物奖励之间的关系

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
{"title":"健康信念模式构建与小学教师使用食物奖励之间的关系","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Teachers’ actions can influence student health and eating preferences. However, few school policies adequately address classroom food practices. Despite recommendations to the contrary, food rewards are often used to manage student behavior and recognize academic success.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the association between elementary teacher use of food rewards and constructs of the Health Belief Model (HBM).</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Elementary school teachers (n=256) from schools located within the midwestern region of the United States completed an online survey which included demographic questions and rating scales to measure a) the types and frequency of classroom food rewards, b) perceived health and wellbeing threats associated with the use of food rewards, c) perceived barriers to de-implementing the use of food rewards, and d) awareness of food policy cues relating to classroom food rewards.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Pearson correlation coefficients were used to measure the association between food reward frequency and scores for each of the HBM constructs. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict food reward frequency and scores for perceived threat, perceived barriers to de-implementing the use of food rewards, and school food policy cues.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Candy was the most frequently used food reward and only 14% (n=35) reported that food rewards were never used. In the univariant analysis, food reward frequency was negatively correlated with school food policy cues (r=-.22, p&lt;.01) and positively correlated with barriers to de-implementing food rewards (r=.47, p&lt;.01). The multiple regression analysis predicted food reward frequency [R2=22, F (3,247) 23.62, p&lt;.001], but only barriers to de-implementing food rewards (β=.45; p&lt;.001) contributed significantly to the prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Teachers do not understand the risks associated with the use of food rewards. Barriers to de-implementation, but not perceived threats or school food policy cues to action, influenced the frequency of food rewards in this sample of elementary school classrooms. The findings of this study have future implications for efficacious policy and training for the discontinuation of the use of food rewards in classrooms.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Kansas State University Health and Human Sciences Graduate Student Research Award, Kansas State University Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Small Grant</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Health Belief Model Constructs and Elementary Teachers' Use of Food Rewards\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Teachers’ actions can influence student health and eating preferences. However, few school policies adequately address classroom food practices. Despite recommendations to the contrary, food rewards are often used to manage student behavior and recognize academic success.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the association between elementary teacher use of food rewards and constructs of the Health Belief Model (HBM).</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Elementary school teachers (n=256) from schools located within the midwestern region of the United States completed an online survey which included demographic questions and rating scales to measure a) the types and frequency of classroom food rewards, b) perceived health and wellbeing threats associated with the use of food rewards, c) perceived barriers to de-implementing the use of food rewards, and d) awareness of food policy cues relating to classroom food rewards.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Pearson correlation coefficients were used to measure the association between food reward frequency and scores for each of the HBM constructs. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict food reward frequency and scores for perceived threat, perceived barriers to de-implementing the use of food rewards, and school food policy cues.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Candy was the most frequently used food reward and only 14% (n=35) reported that food rewards were never used. In the univariant analysis, food reward frequency was negatively correlated with school food policy cues (r=-.22, p&lt;.01) and positively correlated with barriers to de-implementing food rewards (r=.47, p&lt;.01). The multiple regression analysis predicted food reward frequency [R2=22, F (3,247) 23.62, p&lt;.001], but only barriers to de-implementing food rewards (β=.45; p&lt;.001) contributed significantly to the prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Teachers do not understand the risks associated with the use of food rewards. Barriers to de-implementation, but not perceived threats or school food policy cues to action, influenced the frequency of food rewards in this sample of elementary school classrooms. The findings of this study have future implications for efficacious policy and training for the discontinuation of the use of food rewards in classrooms.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Kansas State University Health and Human Sciences Graduate Student Research Award, Kansas State University Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Small Grant</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001544\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景教师的行为会影响学生的健康和饮食偏好。然而,很少有学校政策能充分解决课堂饮食实践问题。研究目的 研究小学教师使用食物奖励与健康信念模型(HBM)构建之间的关联。研究设计、设置、参与者来自美国中西部地区学校的小学教师(人数=256)完成了一项在线调查,调查内容包括人口统计学问题和评分量表,用于测量 a) 课堂食物奖励的类型和频率;b) 与使用食物奖励相关的健康和福利威胁感知;c) 放弃使用食物奖励的障碍感知;d) 对与课堂食物奖励相关的食品政策提示的认识。可衡量的结果/分析使用皮尔逊相关系数来衡量食物奖励频率与每个 "健康、安全、管理 "概念得分之间的关联。使用多元回归分析预测食物奖励频率与感知威胁、感知到的取消使用食物奖励的障碍和学校食物政策提示的得分。结果糖果是最常用的食物奖励,只有 14% 的学生(人数=35)表示从未使用过食物奖励。在单变量分析中,食物奖励频率与学校食物政策提示呈负相关(r=-.22,p<.01),与取消食物奖励的障碍呈正相关(r=.47,p<.01)。多元回归分析预测了食物奖励的频率[R2=22, F (3,247) 23.62, p<.001],但只有取消食物奖励的障碍(β=.45; p<.001)对预测有显著作用。在这一小学教室样本中,取消实施奖励的障碍,而不是感知到的威胁或学校食品政策的行动提示,影响了食品奖励的频率。这项研究的结果对今后制定有效的政策和开展培训以停止在教室中使用食物奖励具有重要意义。资助堪萨斯州立大学健康与人文科学研究生研究奖、堪萨斯州立大学艺术、人文和社会科学小额拨款
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relationship Between Health Belief Model Constructs and Elementary Teachers' Use of Food Rewards

Background

Teachers’ actions can influence student health and eating preferences. However, few school policies adequately address classroom food practices. Despite recommendations to the contrary, food rewards are often used to manage student behavior and recognize academic success.

Objective

To examine the association between elementary teacher use of food rewards and constructs of the Health Belief Model (HBM).

Study Design, Settings, Participants

Elementary school teachers (n=256) from schools located within the midwestern region of the United States completed an online survey which included demographic questions and rating scales to measure a) the types and frequency of classroom food rewards, b) perceived health and wellbeing threats associated with the use of food rewards, c) perceived barriers to de-implementing the use of food rewards, and d) awareness of food policy cues relating to classroom food rewards.

Measurable Outcome/Analysis

Pearson correlation coefficients were used to measure the association between food reward frequency and scores for each of the HBM constructs. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict food reward frequency and scores for perceived threat, perceived barriers to de-implementing the use of food rewards, and school food policy cues.

Results

Candy was the most frequently used food reward and only 14% (n=35) reported that food rewards were never used. In the univariant analysis, food reward frequency was negatively correlated with school food policy cues (r=-.22, p<.01) and positively correlated with barriers to de-implementing food rewards (r=.47, p<.01). The multiple regression analysis predicted food reward frequency [R2=22, F (3,247) 23.62, p<.001], but only barriers to de-implementing food rewards (β=.45; p<.001) contributed significantly to the prediction.

Conclusions

Teachers do not understand the risks associated with the use of food rewards. Barriers to de-implementation, but not perceived threats or school food policy cues to action, influenced the frequency of food rewards in this sample of elementary school classrooms. The findings of this study have future implications for efficacious policy and training for the discontinuation of the use of food rewards in classrooms.

Funding

Kansas State University Health and Human Sciences Graduate Student Research Award, Kansas State University Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Small Grant

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信