COVID-19 学校关闭期间的配餐方法和安全措施

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Samantha Ouellette, Kritika Gupta PhD, PMP, Laurel Lambert PhD, RD, Georgianna Mann PhD
{"title":"COVID-19 学校关闭期间的配餐方法和安全措施","authors":"Samantha Ouellette,&nbsp;Kritika Gupta PhD, PMP,&nbsp;Laurel Lambert PhD, RD,&nbsp;Georgianna Mann PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic prompted unexpected school shutdowns, but the need for nutritious meals for the nation's children persisted. Many states and school districts quickly developed plans to distribute meals to children despite the school closings.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of this study was to describe school distribution methods, meal types, and food safety procedures used in three states: Alabama, Arkansas, and Florida.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>A 62-item survey was sent to child nutrition directors (N=489) in fall 2022 concerning the meal distribution methods and safety measures related challenges faced during the COVID-19 school closures (spring 2020 to spring 2021).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In spring 2020, child nutrition directors reported the reduced school meal participation (70%) and changing COVID-19 protocols were significant challenges (88%). Common challenges were lack of meal preparation supplies (92%), lack of food products (88%), additional and changing COVID-19 protocols (88%) in spring 2021. Staff shortages were also reported as a significant challenge (82%) which, in conjunction with food shortages, created challenges in serving planned menus (86%). At the pandemic onset in spring 2020, frequent cleaning/sanitation (78%) was the primary food safety effort. In spring 2021, the most common food safety efforts included frequent cleaning/sanitation (88%), discontinuing self-service stations (86%), enforcing social distancing (86%), and requiring students to wash hands or use sanitizer prior to meal service (82%). Meal distribution via school pickup was used in spring 2020 (70%), classroom meals in fall 2020 (76%), and cafeteria meals in spring 2021 (76%). More than 70% of child nutrition directors noted that the pandemic highlighted the importance of school meal programs, improved teamwork among school meal program staff, and promoted creativity in menu development.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While the COVID-19 pandemic created significant challenges for schools to provide nutritious meals, many practices adopted by child nutrition directors and their staff could be used during future disasters. The encouraging outcomes seen emphasize the resilience of the school meal program staff even during a global pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Foodservice Systems Management Education Council</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meal Distribution Methods and Safety Measures During COVID-19 School Closures\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Ouellette,&nbsp;Kritika Gupta PhD, PMP,&nbsp;Laurel Lambert PhD, RD,&nbsp;Georgianna Mann PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic prompted unexpected school shutdowns, but the need for nutritious meals for the nation's children persisted. Many states and school districts quickly developed plans to distribute meals to children despite the school closings.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of this study was to describe school distribution methods, meal types, and food safety procedures used in three states: Alabama, Arkansas, and Florida.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>A 62-item survey was sent to child nutrition directors (N=489) in fall 2022 concerning the meal distribution methods and safety measures related challenges faced during the COVID-19 school closures (spring 2020 to spring 2021).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In spring 2020, child nutrition directors reported the reduced school meal participation (70%) and changing COVID-19 protocols were significant challenges (88%). Common challenges were lack of meal preparation supplies (92%), lack of food products (88%), additional and changing COVID-19 protocols (88%) in spring 2021. Staff shortages were also reported as a significant challenge (82%) which, in conjunction with food shortages, created challenges in serving planned menus (86%). At the pandemic onset in spring 2020, frequent cleaning/sanitation (78%) was the primary food safety effort. In spring 2021, the most common food safety efforts included frequent cleaning/sanitation (88%), discontinuing self-service stations (86%), enforcing social distancing (86%), and requiring students to wash hands or use sanitizer prior to meal service (82%). Meal distribution via school pickup was used in spring 2020 (70%), classroom meals in fall 2020 (76%), and cafeteria meals in spring 2021 (76%). More than 70% of child nutrition directors noted that the pandemic highlighted the importance of school meal programs, improved teamwork among school meal program staff, and promoted creativity in menu development.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While the COVID-19 pandemic created significant challenges for schools to provide nutritious meals, many practices adopted by child nutrition directors and their staff could be used during future disasters. The encouraging outcomes seen emphasize the resilience of the school meal program staff even during a global pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Foodservice Systems Management Education Council</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 COVID-19 大流行导致学校意外停课,但全国儿童对营养餐的需求依然存在。尽管学校停课,但许多州和学区仍迅速制定了向儿童分发膳食的计划:2022 年秋季,我们向儿童营养主管(N=489)发送了一份包含 62 个项目的调查问卷,内容涉及 COVID-19 学校关闭期间(2020 年春季至 2021 年春季)所面临的配餐方法和安全措施相关挑战。2021 年春季面临的共同挑战是缺乏备餐用品(92%)、缺乏食品(88%)、额外的和不断变化的 COVID-19 协议(88%)。据报告,人员短缺也是一项重大挑战(82%),再加上食品短缺,为提供计划菜单带来了挑战(86%)。在 2020 年春季大流行开始时,频繁的清洁/卫生(78%)是食品安全的主要工作。2021 年春季,最常见的食品安全工作包括经常清洁/卫生(88%)、停止自助服务站(86%)、强制执行社会隔离(86%)以及要求学生在用餐前洗手或使用消毒剂(82%)。2020 年春季(70%)通过学校接送分发膳食,2020 年秋季(76%)通过教室分发膳食,2021 年春季(76%)通过食堂分发膳食。超过 70% 的儿童营养主任指出,这次大流行凸显了学校膳食计划的重要性,改善了学校膳食计划工作人员之间的团队合作,并促进了菜单开发的创造性。结论虽然 COVID-19 大流行给学校提供营养膳食带来了巨大挑战,但儿童营养主任及其工作人员采用的许多做法可在未来的灾难中使用。令人鼓舞的成果强调了学校膳食计划工作人员即使在全球大流行病期间也能坚韧不拔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meal Distribution Methods and Safety Measures During COVID-19 School Closures

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted unexpected school shutdowns, but the need for nutritious meals for the nation's children persisted. Many states and school districts quickly developed plans to distribute meals to children despite the school closings.

Objective

The goal of this study was to describe school distribution methods, meal types, and food safety procedures used in three states: Alabama, Arkansas, and Florida.

Study Design, Settings, Participants

A 62-item survey was sent to child nutrition directors (N=489) in fall 2022 concerning the meal distribution methods and safety measures related challenges faced during the COVID-19 school closures (spring 2020 to spring 2021).

Results

In spring 2020, child nutrition directors reported the reduced school meal participation (70%) and changing COVID-19 protocols were significant challenges (88%). Common challenges were lack of meal preparation supplies (92%), lack of food products (88%), additional and changing COVID-19 protocols (88%) in spring 2021. Staff shortages were also reported as a significant challenge (82%) which, in conjunction with food shortages, created challenges in serving planned menus (86%). At the pandemic onset in spring 2020, frequent cleaning/sanitation (78%) was the primary food safety effort. In spring 2021, the most common food safety efforts included frequent cleaning/sanitation (88%), discontinuing self-service stations (86%), enforcing social distancing (86%), and requiring students to wash hands or use sanitizer prior to meal service (82%). Meal distribution via school pickup was used in spring 2020 (70%), classroom meals in fall 2020 (76%), and cafeteria meals in spring 2021 (76%). More than 70% of child nutrition directors noted that the pandemic highlighted the importance of school meal programs, improved teamwork among school meal program staff, and promoted creativity in menu development.

Conclusions

While the COVID-19 pandemic created significant challenges for schools to provide nutritious meals, many practices adopted by child nutrition directors and their staff could be used during future disasters. The encouraging outcomes seen emphasize the resilience of the school meal program staff even during a global pandemic.

Funding

Foodservice Systems Management Education Council

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信