{"title":"开展调查以评估学生对校园社区花园的兴趣","authors":"Rebecca Allgeier, Teresa Drake PhD, RDN, MCHES","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Food insecurity is a significant problem on college campuses. Community gardens are a potential solution and have additional benefits such as the promotion of sustainable thoughts and actions, improvement of mental wellness, and even increased academic performance, without the same level of stigma associated with other interventions such as food pantries.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop an instrument to assess behavioral capability, expectations, value expectancies, self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and likelihood to volunteer among students regarding a campus-based, community garden.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted at a Mid-western, private university using a convenience sampling of students. Instrument items were developed using the Social Cognitive Theory, and the survey was administered online.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Internal consistency of the subscales was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Descriptive statistics were used to report demographics and interest level of participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 209 respondents, 60% were women and ages ranged 18-43 years (M= 20.46 + 2.67). The internal consistency reliability of the subscales for behavioral capability, expectations, expectancies, and likelihood to volunteer were excellent (ɑ= .90, .90, .93, .92, respectively). Self-efficacy and collective efficacy were only 1 item each so reliability was not analyzed. Of respondents, 70% (n=190) felt confident in their ability to contribute to the garden, and 85% (n=190) felt confident students could work together to contribute. Seventy percent (n=189) also reported they would be likely to volunteer in the garden, and 75% (n=188) would be likely to use the produce grown.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This instrument was determined to be reliable among this population. Other institutions may also find this survey useful to determine interest in a campus-based community garden.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>None</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"56 8","pages":"Pages S1-S2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Survey to Assess Student Interest in a Campus-Based Community Garden\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Allgeier, Teresa Drake PhD, RDN, MCHES\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Food insecurity is a significant problem on college campuses. Community gardens are a potential solution and have additional benefits such as the promotion of sustainable thoughts and actions, improvement of mental wellness, and even increased academic performance, without the same level of stigma associated with other interventions such as food pantries.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop an instrument to assess behavioral capability, expectations, value expectancies, self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and likelihood to volunteer among students regarding a campus-based, community garden.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted at a Mid-western, private university using a convenience sampling of students. Instrument items were developed using the Social Cognitive Theory, and the survey was administered online.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Internal consistency of the subscales was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Descriptive statistics were used to report demographics and interest level of participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 209 respondents, 60% were women and ages ranged 18-43 years (M= 20.46 + 2.67). The internal consistency reliability of the subscales for behavioral capability, expectations, expectancies, and likelihood to volunteer were excellent (ɑ= .90, .90, .93, .92, respectively). Self-efficacy and collective efficacy were only 1 item each so reliability was not analyzed. Of respondents, 70% (n=190) felt confident in their ability to contribute to the garden, and 85% (n=190) felt confident students could work together to contribute. Seventy percent (n=189) also reported they would be likely to volunteer in the garden, and 75% (n=188) would be likely to use the produce grown.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This instrument was determined to be reliable among this population. Other institutions may also find this survey useful to determine interest in a campus-based community garden.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>None</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"56 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages S1-S2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404624001076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a Survey to Assess Student Interest in a Campus-Based Community Garden
Background
Food insecurity is a significant problem on college campuses. Community gardens are a potential solution and have additional benefits such as the promotion of sustainable thoughts and actions, improvement of mental wellness, and even increased academic performance, without the same level of stigma associated with other interventions such as food pantries.
Objective
To develop an instrument to assess behavioral capability, expectations, value expectancies, self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and likelihood to volunteer among students regarding a campus-based, community garden.
Study Design, Settings, Participants
This cross-sectional study was conducted at a Mid-western, private university using a convenience sampling of students. Instrument items were developed using the Social Cognitive Theory, and the survey was administered online.
Measurable Outcome/Analysis
Internal consistency of the subscales was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Descriptive statistics were used to report demographics and interest level of participants.
Results
Of the 209 respondents, 60% were women and ages ranged 18-43 years (M= 20.46 + 2.67). The internal consistency reliability of the subscales for behavioral capability, expectations, expectancies, and likelihood to volunteer were excellent (ɑ= .90, .90, .93, .92, respectively). Self-efficacy and collective efficacy were only 1 item each so reliability was not analyzed. Of respondents, 70% (n=190) felt confident in their ability to contribute to the garden, and 85% (n=190) felt confident students could work together to contribute. Seventy percent (n=189) also reported they would be likely to volunteer in the garden, and 75% (n=188) would be likely to use the produce grown.
Conclusions
This instrument was determined to be reliable among this population. Other institutions may also find this survey useful to determine interest in a campus-based community garden.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas.
The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.