{"title":"国际贸易与生物多样性:出口是物种杀手吗?","authors":"Hui Tian, Chaoyin Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Species diversity has continuously been experiencing deterioration in the world that is widely connected with global trade. Previous studies have identified the impact of specific traded commodities on species diversity, but little evidence of causality from overall exports has been found. Using two-stage least-squares method with an instrument variable (IV-2SLS) and province-level panel data during 1978–2020, this paper explores the biological costs of international trade by investigating the impact of exports from China on domestic species diversity. We also examine the mechanisms through which exports affect species diversity and how heterogeneous factors cause differences on loss of species diversity. Results suggest that a 1% increase in export scale decreases species diversity by 2.28%. We also find that resource exploitation, infrastructure construction and land use are three major channels. Additionally, the provinces with more alien invasive species (over 450) or with higher dependence on exporting leather and textiles (over 16%) may suffer over 4% of species diversity loss per 1% of export scale. Moreover, the loss of plants is 2.43%, which is 0.83% higher than that of animals. Our transdisciplinary work is expected to be helpful for policy makers who pursue dual goals of export development and biodiversity protection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International trade and biodiversity: Is export a species killer?\",\"authors\":\"Hui Tian, Chaoyin Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Species diversity has continuously been experiencing deterioration in the world that is widely connected with global trade. Previous studies have identified the impact of specific traded commodities on species diversity, but little evidence of causality from overall exports has been found. Using two-stage least-squares method with an instrument variable (IV-2SLS) and province-level panel data during 1978–2020, this paper explores the biological costs of international trade by investigating the impact of exports from China on domestic species diversity. We also examine the mechanisms through which exports affect species diversity and how heterogeneous factors cause differences on loss of species diversity. Results suggest that a 1% increase in export scale decreases species diversity by 2.28%. We also find that resource exploitation, infrastructure construction and land use are three major channels. Additionally, the provinces with more alien invasive species (over 450) or with higher dependence on exporting leather and textiles (over 16%) may suffer over 4% of species diversity loss per 1% of export scale. Moreover, the loss of plants is 2.43%, which is 0.83% higher than that of animals. Our transdisciplinary work is expected to be helpful for policy makers who pursue dual goals of export development and biodiversity protection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002106\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
International trade and biodiversity: Is export a species killer?
Species diversity has continuously been experiencing deterioration in the world that is widely connected with global trade. Previous studies have identified the impact of specific traded commodities on species diversity, but little evidence of causality from overall exports has been found. Using two-stage least-squares method with an instrument variable (IV-2SLS) and province-level panel data during 1978–2020, this paper explores the biological costs of international trade by investigating the impact of exports from China on domestic species diversity. We also examine the mechanisms through which exports affect species diversity and how heterogeneous factors cause differences on loss of species diversity. Results suggest that a 1% increase in export scale decreases species diversity by 2.28%. We also find that resource exploitation, infrastructure construction and land use are three major channels. Additionally, the provinces with more alien invasive species (over 450) or with higher dependence on exporting leather and textiles (over 16%) may suffer over 4% of species diversity loss per 1% of export scale. Moreover, the loss of plants is 2.43%, which is 0.83% higher than that of animals. Our transdisciplinary work is expected to be helpful for policy makers who pursue dual goals of export development and biodiversity protection.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.