{"title":"在本地树苗建立之后到达的非本地物种是否会影响恢复结果?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Species that arrive first influence community assembly. This “priority effect” has been extensively applied in ecological restoration through the removal of invasive plants and subsequent introduction of native species, assuming that recolonization by invaders will be hindered by introduced natives. Nonetheless, often the target community is very prone to reinvasion, which might be partially due to poor early growth of natives. This study examines this phenomenon and potential underlying mechanisms in a woodland restoration area in southwestern Australia, considering both, the response and effect of sown native species in relation to a nonnative community re-emerging relatively late due to its initial removal. We aimed to elucidate the effects of a range of factors including phylogenetic relatedness of the seed mixes to annual grasses on nonnative community, seed mass, soil moisture and other soil variables linked to it. We sowed three natives seed mixes in an old field following removal of the nonnative annual grass community broadly dominated by annual grasses. We examined the direction and intensity of the interaction between these and the nonnative community. The seed mixes included (1) monocultures of the native grass <em>Rytidosperma caespitosa</em>, (2) monocultures of six woody species and (3) cultures mixing the native grass with each woody species. Overall, nonnative species dominated by annual grasses emerging late did not affect woody natives but suppressed native grass <em>Rytidosperma</em>, both as a monoculture and mixed with woody species. When growing alongside late nonnatives, the survival of woody natives was favored by woody species seed mass and soil moisture, while the depth of the sandy layer on the soil surface limited the response of <em>Rytidosperma</em>. These results suggest that phylogenetic distance or relatedness might be key to optimizing priority response and effects when restoring ecosystems. The other variables found to enhance native species’ competitive abilities (seed mass, seeding density of <em>Rytidosperma</em> and possibly soil moisture) indicate the importance of considering a variety of factors to optimize restoration based on priority effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724004869/pdfft?md5=3a42f723cf413c3b9bfd1be84d08931f&pid=1-s2.0-S0378112724004869-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do nonnative species arriving after native seedling establishment affect restoration outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Species that arrive first influence community assembly. This “priority effect” has been extensively applied in ecological restoration through the removal of invasive plants and subsequent introduction of native species, assuming that recolonization by invaders will be hindered by introduced natives. Nonetheless, often the target community is very prone to reinvasion, which might be partially due to poor early growth of natives. This study examines this phenomenon and potential underlying mechanisms in a woodland restoration area in southwestern Australia, considering both, the response and effect of sown native species in relation to a nonnative community re-emerging relatively late due to its initial removal. We aimed to elucidate the effects of a range of factors including phylogenetic relatedness of the seed mixes to annual grasses on nonnative community, seed mass, soil moisture and other soil variables linked to it. We sowed three natives seed mixes in an old field following removal of the nonnative annual grass community broadly dominated by annual grasses. We examined the direction and intensity of the interaction between these and the nonnative community. The seed mixes included (1) monocultures of the native grass <em>Rytidosperma caespitosa</em>, (2) monocultures of six woody species and (3) cultures mixing the native grass with each woody species. Overall, nonnative species dominated by annual grasses emerging late did not affect woody natives but suppressed native grass <em>Rytidosperma</em>, both as a monoculture and mixed with woody species. When growing alongside late nonnatives, the survival of woody natives was favored by woody species seed mass and soil moisture, while the depth of the sandy layer on the soil surface limited the response of <em>Rytidosperma</em>. These results suggest that phylogenetic distance or relatedness might be key to optimizing priority response and effects when restoring ecosystems. The other variables found to enhance native species’ competitive abilities (seed mass, seeding density of <em>Rytidosperma</em> and possibly soil moisture) indicate the importance of considering a variety of factors to optimize restoration based on priority effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724004869/pdfft?md5=3a42f723cf413c3b9bfd1be84d08931f&pid=1-s2.0-S0378112724004869-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724004869\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724004869","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do nonnative species arriving after native seedling establishment affect restoration outcomes?
Species that arrive first influence community assembly. This “priority effect” has been extensively applied in ecological restoration through the removal of invasive plants and subsequent introduction of native species, assuming that recolonization by invaders will be hindered by introduced natives. Nonetheless, often the target community is very prone to reinvasion, which might be partially due to poor early growth of natives. This study examines this phenomenon and potential underlying mechanisms in a woodland restoration area in southwestern Australia, considering both, the response and effect of sown native species in relation to a nonnative community re-emerging relatively late due to its initial removal. We aimed to elucidate the effects of a range of factors including phylogenetic relatedness of the seed mixes to annual grasses on nonnative community, seed mass, soil moisture and other soil variables linked to it. We sowed three natives seed mixes in an old field following removal of the nonnative annual grass community broadly dominated by annual grasses. We examined the direction and intensity of the interaction between these and the nonnative community. The seed mixes included (1) monocultures of the native grass Rytidosperma caespitosa, (2) monocultures of six woody species and (3) cultures mixing the native grass with each woody species. Overall, nonnative species dominated by annual grasses emerging late did not affect woody natives but suppressed native grass Rytidosperma, both as a monoculture and mixed with woody species. When growing alongside late nonnatives, the survival of woody natives was favored by woody species seed mass and soil moisture, while the depth of the sandy layer on the soil surface limited the response of Rytidosperma. These results suggest that phylogenetic distance or relatedness might be key to optimizing priority response and effects when restoring ecosystems. The other variables found to enhance native species’ competitive abilities (seed mass, seeding density of Rytidosperma and possibly soil moisture) indicate the importance of considering a variety of factors to optimize restoration based on priority effects.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.