在本地树苗建立之后到达的非本地物种是否会影响恢复结果?

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
{"title":"在本地树苗建立之后到达的非本地物种是否会影响恢复结果?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Species that arrive first influence community assembly. This “priority effect” has been extensively applied in ecological restoration through the removal of invasive plants and subsequent introduction of native species, assuming that recolonization by invaders will be hindered by introduced natives. Nonetheless, often the target community is very prone to reinvasion, which might be partially due to poor early growth of natives. This study examines this phenomenon and potential underlying mechanisms in a woodland restoration area in southwestern Australia, considering both, the response and effect of sown native species in relation to a nonnative community re-emerging relatively late due to its initial removal. We aimed to elucidate the effects of a range of factors including phylogenetic relatedness of the seed mixes to annual grasses on nonnative community, seed mass, soil moisture and other soil variables linked to it. We sowed three natives seed mixes in an old field following removal of the nonnative annual grass community broadly dominated by annual grasses. We examined the direction and intensity of the interaction between these and the nonnative community. The seed mixes included (1) monocultures of the native grass <em>Rytidosperma caespitosa</em>, (2) monocultures of six woody species and (3) cultures mixing the native grass with each woody species. Overall, nonnative species dominated by annual grasses emerging late did not affect woody natives but suppressed native grass <em>Rytidosperma</em>, both as a monoculture and mixed with woody species. When growing alongside late nonnatives, the survival of woody natives was favored by woody species seed mass and soil moisture, while the depth of the sandy layer on the soil surface limited the response of <em>Rytidosperma</em>. These results suggest that phylogenetic distance or relatedness might be key to optimizing priority response and effects when restoring ecosystems. The other variables found to enhance native species’ competitive abilities (seed mass, seeding density of <em>Rytidosperma</em> and possibly soil moisture) indicate the importance of considering a variety of factors to optimize restoration based on priority effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724004869/pdfft?md5=3a42f723cf413c3b9bfd1be84d08931f&pid=1-s2.0-S0378112724004869-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do nonnative species arriving after native seedling establishment affect restoration outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Species that arrive first influence community assembly. This “priority effect” has been extensively applied in ecological restoration through the removal of invasive plants and subsequent introduction of native species, assuming that recolonization by invaders will be hindered by introduced natives. Nonetheless, often the target community is very prone to reinvasion, which might be partially due to poor early growth of natives. This study examines this phenomenon and potential underlying mechanisms in a woodland restoration area in southwestern Australia, considering both, the response and effect of sown native species in relation to a nonnative community re-emerging relatively late due to its initial removal. We aimed to elucidate the effects of a range of factors including phylogenetic relatedness of the seed mixes to annual grasses on nonnative community, seed mass, soil moisture and other soil variables linked to it. We sowed three natives seed mixes in an old field following removal of the nonnative annual grass community broadly dominated by annual grasses. We examined the direction and intensity of the interaction between these and the nonnative community. The seed mixes included (1) monocultures of the native grass <em>Rytidosperma caespitosa</em>, (2) monocultures of six woody species and (3) cultures mixing the native grass with each woody species. Overall, nonnative species dominated by annual grasses emerging late did not affect woody natives but suppressed native grass <em>Rytidosperma</em>, both as a monoculture and mixed with woody species. When growing alongside late nonnatives, the survival of woody natives was favored by woody species seed mass and soil moisture, while the depth of the sandy layer on the soil surface limited the response of <em>Rytidosperma</em>. These results suggest that phylogenetic distance or relatedness might be key to optimizing priority response and effects when restoring ecosystems. The other variables found to enhance native species’ competitive abilities (seed mass, seeding density of <em>Rytidosperma</em> and possibly soil moisture) indicate the importance of considering a variety of factors to optimize restoration based on priority effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724004869/pdfft?md5=3a42f723cf413c3b9bfd1be84d08931f&pid=1-s2.0-S0378112724004869-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724004869\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724004869","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先到达的物种会影响群落的组合。这种 "优先效应 "被广泛应用于生态恢复中,通过移除入侵植物,随后引入本地物种,假定入侵者的重新定居将受到引入的本地物种的阻碍。然而,目标群落往往很容易再次入侵,部分原因可能是本地物种早期生长不良。本研究在澳大利亚西南部的一个林地恢复区研究了这一现象和潜在的内在机制,同时考虑了播种的本地物种对因最初移除而相对较晚重新出现的非本地群落的反应和影响。我们的目标是阐明一系列因素的影响,包括混合种子与一年生草的系统发育相关性对非本地群落、种子质量、土壤湿度和其他相关土壤变量的影响。在清除了以一年生草为主的非本地一年生草群落后,我们在一块老田里播种了三种本地混合种子。我们研究了这些种子与非本地群落之间相互作用的方向和强度。混合种子包括:(1)本地草 Rytidosperma caespitosa 的单一栽培;(2)六种木本植物的单一栽培;(3)本地草与每种木本植物的混合栽培。总体而言,以晚生一年生草为主的非本地物种不会影响木本本地草,但会抑制本地草 Rytidosperma 的生长,无论是单一栽培还是与木本物种混合栽培。当与晚生非本地物种一起生长时,木本本地草的存活受到木本物种种子质量和土壤湿度的影响,而土壤表面沙层的深度则限制了 Rytidosperma 的反应。这些结果表明,在恢复生态系统时,系统发育距离或亲缘关系可能是优化优先响应和效果的关键。发现的其他可提高本地物种竞争能力的变量(种子质量、Rytidosperma 的播种密度以及可能的土壤湿度)表明,根据优先效应考虑各种因素以优化恢复的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do nonnative species arriving after native seedling establishment affect restoration outcomes?

Species that arrive first influence community assembly. This “priority effect” has been extensively applied in ecological restoration through the removal of invasive plants and subsequent introduction of native species, assuming that recolonization by invaders will be hindered by introduced natives. Nonetheless, often the target community is very prone to reinvasion, which might be partially due to poor early growth of natives. This study examines this phenomenon and potential underlying mechanisms in a woodland restoration area in southwestern Australia, considering both, the response and effect of sown native species in relation to a nonnative community re-emerging relatively late due to its initial removal. We aimed to elucidate the effects of a range of factors including phylogenetic relatedness of the seed mixes to annual grasses on nonnative community, seed mass, soil moisture and other soil variables linked to it. We sowed three natives seed mixes in an old field following removal of the nonnative annual grass community broadly dominated by annual grasses. We examined the direction and intensity of the interaction between these and the nonnative community. The seed mixes included (1) monocultures of the native grass Rytidosperma caespitosa, (2) monocultures of six woody species and (3) cultures mixing the native grass with each woody species. Overall, nonnative species dominated by annual grasses emerging late did not affect woody natives but suppressed native grass Rytidosperma, both as a monoculture and mixed with woody species. When growing alongside late nonnatives, the survival of woody natives was favored by woody species seed mass and soil moisture, while the depth of the sandy layer on the soil surface limited the response of Rytidosperma. These results suggest that phylogenetic distance or relatedness might be key to optimizing priority response and effects when restoring ecosystems. The other variables found to enhance native species’ competitive abilities (seed mass, seeding density of Rytidosperma and possibly soil moisture) indicate the importance of considering a variety of factors to optimize restoration based on priority effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信