中国合肥市居民天然气分档价格上调效果评估

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
{"title":"中国合肥市居民天然气分档价格上调效果评估","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An increasing block tariff (IBT) policy for residential natural gas has been implemented in all Chinese cities with gas supply since January 2016 to guide residents to reduce gas. Due to the different local climate and demographic characteristics of China's regions, the IBT is not uniform, which provides an opportunity to evaluate the energy-saving effect of IBTs. This paper takes Hefei City as an example, based on a bimonthly bill dataset of Hefei residents from January 2014 to October 2018 and a difference-in-difference (DID) experiment designed within a regression discontinuity design (RDD) framework. The results show that the current IBT has a significant energy-saving effect, especially for households falling within the third price block, but not for households near the price-block thresholds. Further heterogeneity analyses show higher treatment effects for wall-mounted boiler heating users than non-wall-mounted boiler heating users and during the heating season than the non-heating season. These results suggest that the government should optimize the IBT from three to four blocks and develop separate rates for different users and seasons.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the effect of increasing block tariffs for residential natural gas in Hefei City, China\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An increasing block tariff (IBT) policy for residential natural gas has been implemented in all Chinese cities with gas supply since January 2016 to guide residents to reduce gas. Due to the different local climate and demographic characteristics of China's regions, the IBT is not uniform, which provides an opportunity to evaluate the energy-saving effect of IBTs. This paper takes Hefei City as an example, based on a bimonthly bill dataset of Hefei residents from January 2014 to October 2018 and a difference-in-difference (DID) experiment designed within a regression discontinuity design (RDD) framework. The results show that the current IBT has a significant energy-saving effect, especially for households falling within the third price block, but not for households near the price-block thresholds. Further heterogeneity analyses show higher treatment effects for wall-mounted boiler heating users than non-wall-mounted boiler heating users and during the heating season than the non-heating season. These results suggest that the government should optimize the IBT from three to four blocks and develop separate rates for different users and seasons.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724000985\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724000985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 2016 年 1 月起,中国所有供气城市开始实施居民天然气阶梯气价(IBT)政策,以引导居民减少用气。由于中国各地区的气候和人口特征不同,IBT 并不统一,这为评估 IBT 的节能效果提供了契机。本文以合肥市为例,基于合肥市居民 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 10 月的双月账单数据集,在回归不连续设计(RDD)框架下设计了差分(DID)实验。结果表明,现行的 IBT 具有显著的节能效果,尤其是对属于第三价格区块的家庭,但对价格区块临界点附近的家庭则没有节能效果。进一步的异质性分析表明,壁挂锅炉采暖用户的治疗效果高于非壁挂锅炉采暖用户,采暖季的治疗效果高于非采暖季。这些结果表明,政府应将综合预算指数从三个区块优化为四个区块,并针对不同用户和季节制定不同的费率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the effect of increasing block tariffs for residential natural gas in Hefei City, China

Assessing the effect of increasing block tariffs for residential natural gas in Hefei City, China

An increasing block tariff (IBT) policy for residential natural gas has been implemented in all Chinese cities with gas supply since January 2016 to guide residents to reduce gas. Due to the different local climate and demographic characteristics of China's regions, the IBT is not uniform, which provides an opportunity to evaluate the energy-saving effect of IBTs. This paper takes Hefei City as an example, based on a bimonthly bill dataset of Hefei residents from January 2014 to October 2018 and a difference-in-difference (DID) experiment designed within a regression discontinuity design (RDD) framework. The results show that the current IBT has a significant energy-saving effect, especially for households falling within the third price block, but not for households near the price-block thresholds. Further heterogeneity analyses show higher treatment effects for wall-mounted boiler heating users than non-wall-mounted boiler heating users and during the heating season than the non-heating season. These results suggest that the government should optimize the IBT from three to four blocks and develop separate rates for different users and seasons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信