Kristian Svendsen, Mohsen Askar, Danial Umer, Kjell H. Halvorsen
{"title":"ChatGPT 对药学专业学生的短期学习效果","authors":"Kristian Svendsen, Mohsen Askar, Danial Umer, Kjell H. Halvorsen","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Students in pharmacy are positive towards integrating artificial intelligence and ChatGPT into their practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct short-term learning effect of using Chat GPT by pharmacy students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was an experimental randomized study. Students were allocated into two groups; the intervention group (<em>n</em> = 15) used all study tools and ChatGPT, while the control group (<em>n</em> = 16) used all study tools, except ChatGPT. Differences between groups was measured by how well they performed on a knowledge test before and after a short study period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups in level of competence in the pretest score (<em>p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.28</em>). There was also no significant effect of using ChatGPT, with a mean adjusted difference of 0.5 points on a 12-point scale. However there was a trend towards a higher proportion of ChatGPT participants having a large (at least four point) increase in score (4 out of 15) <em>vs</em> control group (1 out of 16).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a potential for positive effects of ChatGPT on learning outcomes in pharmacy students, however the current study was underpowered to measure a statistically significant effect of ChatGPT on short term learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000751/pdfft?md5=d65bb9031080175247b69b4502982785&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000751-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term learning effect of ChatGPT on pharmacy students' learning\",\"authors\":\"Kristian Svendsen, Mohsen Askar, Danial Umer, Kjell H. Halvorsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Students in pharmacy are positive towards integrating artificial intelligence and ChatGPT into their practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct short-term learning effect of using Chat GPT by pharmacy students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was an experimental randomized study. Students were allocated into two groups; the intervention group (<em>n</em> = 15) used all study tools and ChatGPT, while the control group (<em>n</em> = 16) used all study tools, except ChatGPT. Differences between groups was measured by how well they performed on a knowledge test before and after a short study period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups in level of competence in the pretest score (<em>p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.28</em>). There was also no significant effect of using ChatGPT, with a mean adjusted difference of 0.5 points on a 12-point scale. However there was a trend towards a higher proportion of ChatGPT participants having a large (at least four point) increase in score (4 out of 15) <em>vs</em> control group (1 out of 16).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a potential for positive effects of ChatGPT on learning outcomes in pharmacy students, however the current study was underpowered to measure a statistically significant effect of ChatGPT on short term learning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000751/pdfft?md5=d65bb9031080175247b69b4502982785&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000751-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Short-term learning effect of ChatGPT on pharmacy students' learning
Introduction
Students in pharmacy are positive towards integrating artificial intelligence and ChatGPT into their practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct short-term learning effect of using Chat GPT by pharmacy students.
Methods
This was an experimental randomized study. Students were allocated into two groups; the intervention group (n = 15) used all study tools and ChatGPT, while the control group (n = 16) used all study tools, except ChatGPT. Differences between groups was measured by how well they performed on a knowledge test before and after a short study period.
Results
No significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups in level of competence in the pretest score (p=0.28). There was also no significant effect of using ChatGPT, with a mean adjusted difference of 0.5 points on a 12-point scale. However there was a trend towards a higher proportion of ChatGPT participants having a large (at least four point) increase in score (4 out of 15) vs control group (1 out of 16).
Conclusion
There is a potential for positive effects of ChatGPT on learning outcomes in pharmacy students, however the current study was underpowered to measure a statistically significant effect of ChatGPT on short term learning.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
