青霉素过敏去标签:为患者和家属调整风险分层工具

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Simonne L. Horwitz MD, JD, MBA , Ye Shen MPH , Stephanie C. Erdle MD, FRCPC , Chelsea Elwood BMScH, MSc, MD, FRCSC , Raymond Mak MD, FRCPC , John Jacob PhD, MSc, MBA , Tiffany Wong MD, FRCPC
{"title":"青霉素过敏去标签:为患者和家属调整风险分层工具","authors":"Simonne L. Horwitz MD, JD, MBA ,&nbsp;Ye Shen MPH ,&nbsp;Stephanie C. Erdle MD, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Chelsea Elwood BMScH, MSc, MD, FRCSC ,&nbsp;Raymond Mak MD, FRCPC ,&nbsp;John Jacob PhD, MSc, MBA ,&nbsp;Tiffany Wong MD, FRCPC","doi":"10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Penicillin allergy is reported in 10% of the population; however, over 90% of patients are deemed non-allergic upon allergist assessment. The goal of this quality improvement project is to validate a patient-driven assessment tool to safely identify patients at low risk of penicillin allergy and de-label them. Pediatric patients and pregnant women referred to the institution's allergy clinics for penicillin allergy assessment were invited to use the patient tool to complete a self-assessment, resulting in the assignment of a risk category. The risk stratification determined using the patient tool was compared against the allergist's assessment.</p><p>The patient tool demonstrated agreement with the allergist assessment in 57/84 (67.9%, 95% CI [56.7%,77.4%]) assessments, intra-class correlation (ICC) = 0.618, p &lt; 0.001. In 22/84 (26.2%) assessments, the patient tool determined a higher risk category, primarily due to differences in patients’ perceived timing and description of symptoms. Only 5/84 (6.0%) patients were placed in a lower risk category by the patient tool compared to the allergist assessment. The patient tool demonstrates good validity in determining penicillin allergy risk, offering potential as a method of empowering patients to advocate in their care. Iterative changes to the patient tool will be applied to increase agreement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193945512400070X/pdfft?md5=5df5d877f62ea8f9a001e26c95785778&pid=1-s2.0-S193945512400070X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penicillin allergy de-labeling: Adaptation of risk stratification tool for patients and families\",\"authors\":\"Simonne L. Horwitz MD, JD, MBA ,&nbsp;Ye Shen MPH ,&nbsp;Stephanie C. Erdle MD, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Chelsea Elwood BMScH, MSc, MD, FRCSC ,&nbsp;Raymond Mak MD, FRCPC ,&nbsp;John Jacob PhD, MSc, MBA ,&nbsp;Tiffany Wong MD, FRCPC\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Penicillin allergy is reported in 10% of the population; however, over 90% of patients are deemed non-allergic upon allergist assessment. The goal of this quality improvement project is to validate a patient-driven assessment tool to safely identify patients at low risk of penicillin allergy and de-label them. Pediatric patients and pregnant women referred to the institution's allergy clinics for penicillin allergy assessment were invited to use the patient tool to complete a self-assessment, resulting in the assignment of a risk category. The risk stratification determined using the patient tool was compared against the allergist's assessment.</p><p>The patient tool demonstrated agreement with the allergist assessment in 57/84 (67.9%, 95% CI [56.7%,77.4%]) assessments, intra-class correlation (ICC) = 0.618, p &lt; 0.001. In 22/84 (26.2%) assessments, the patient tool determined a higher risk category, primarily due to differences in patients’ perceived timing and description of symptoms. Only 5/84 (6.0%) patients were placed in a lower risk category by the patient tool compared to the allergist assessment. The patient tool demonstrates good validity in determining penicillin allergy risk, offering potential as a method of empowering patients to advocate in their care. Iterative changes to the patient tool will be applied to increase agreement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193945512400070X/pdfft?md5=5df5d877f62ea8f9a001e26c95785778&pid=1-s2.0-S193945512400070X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193945512400070X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193945512400070X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报告,10% 的人群对青霉素过敏;然而,超过 90% 的患者经过敏专科医生评估后被认为不过敏。本质量改进项目的目标是验证一种以患者为导向的评估工具,以安全地识别青霉素过敏的低风险患者,并取消对他们的标记。该机构邀请转诊到过敏门诊进行青霉素过敏评估的儿科患者和孕妇使用患者工具完成自我评估,从而确定风险类别。在 57/84 次(67.9%,95% CI [56.7%,77.4%])评估中,患者工具与过敏专科医生的评估结果一致,类内相关性 (ICC) = 0.618,p < 0.001。在 22/84 次(26.2%)评估中,患者工具确定了较高的风险类别,这主要是由于患者感知的时间和症状描述存在差异。与过敏专科医生的评估结果相比,只有 5/84 例(6.0%)患者的患者工具确定的风险类别较低。患者工具在确定青霉素过敏风险方面显示出良好的有效性,可作为一种增强患者能力的方法,让患者在护理过程中发挥倡导作用。将对患者工具进行反复修改,以提高一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Penicillin allergy de-labeling: Adaptation of risk stratification tool for patients and families

Penicillin allergy is reported in 10% of the population; however, over 90% of patients are deemed non-allergic upon allergist assessment. The goal of this quality improvement project is to validate a patient-driven assessment tool to safely identify patients at low risk of penicillin allergy and de-label them. Pediatric patients and pregnant women referred to the institution's allergy clinics for penicillin allergy assessment were invited to use the patient tool to complete a self-assessment, resulting in the assignment of a risk category. The risk stratification determined using the patient tool was compared against the allergist's assessment.

The patient tool demonstrated agreement with the allergist assessment in 57/84 (67.9%, 95% CI [56.7%,77.4%]) assessments, intra-class correlation (ICC) = 0.618, p < 0.001. In 22/84 (26.2%) assessments, the patient tool determined a higher risk category, primarily due to differences in patients’ perceived timing and description of symptoms. Only 5/84 (6.0%) patients were placed in a lower risk category by the patient tool compared to the allergist assessment. The patient tool demonstrates good validity in determining penicillin allergy risk, offering potential as a method of empowering patients to advocate in their care. Iterative changes to the patient tool will be applied to increase agreement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信