{"title":"学龄儿童(6-11 岁)使用亲子共同回忆的范围界定研究","authors":"Yu-Chen Lin BS, Sina Gallo RDN, PhD, MS, Suzanne Baxter PhD, LD, RD, Staci Belcher MS, RD, Emmaline Peterson BS, RD, Casey Roberson, Tiolulope Popoola","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dietary-intake assessment among children is challenging due to developmental and cognitive immaturity hence, dietary recall is the preferred tool for use with school-aged children. National surveys usually use consensus or parent-child “joint recalls” among school-aged children. To advance the field of dietary assessment, and evaluate the effectiveness of nutrition education, there is a need to understand how joint recalls are reported in the literature.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To conduct a scoping review concerning the use of parent-child joint dietary recalls among children and the justifications/rationales provided to support their use.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review checklist was used.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Five databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Dietary Assessment Calibration/Validation Register) to identify articles on dietary intake assessment among children aged 6–11. All peer-reviewed studies published in English were eligible except for reviews, meta-analyses, conference abstracts, letters, guidelines, comments, editorials, and case studies/reports.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 5,868 articles identified, 3,652 were excluded based on title and abstract. Of the 2,216 articles that underwent full-text review, 1,415 were excluded (mean age outside >6 and ≤12, no joint recall, no diet recall, not English, duplicate publication, not research study, non-human study, other). Of the 801 articles remaining, 306 were unclear (lacked diet recall details), and 495 met inclusion criteria (with 210 national surveys, 225 cross-sectional studies, 36 cohort studies, 15 randomized controlled trials, and 9 case-control studies). Of these 495, 388 used joint recalls. Preliminary results showed that most (74%) did not cite a validation study to support using joint recalls.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, 38% of 801 articles lacked diet recall details, and 74% of 801 articles failed to cite a reference to support using joint recalls. Results highlight a crucial gap in how the literature describes dietary recalls with school-aged children. Author guidelines to provide details concerning dietary recalls among school-aged children are needed to ensure consistency and improve diet-related nutrition research.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>None</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"56 8","pages":"Page S37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review on the Use of Parent-Child Joint Recalls Among School-Aged Children (6–11 Years)\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Chen Lin BS, Sina Gallo RDN, PhD, MS, Suzanne Baxter PhD, LD, RD, Staci Belcher MS, RD, Emmaline Peterson BS, RD, Casey Roberson, Tiolulope Popoola\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dietary-intake assessment among children is challenging due to developmental and cognitive immaturity hence, dietary recall is the preferred tool for use with school-aged children. National surveys usually use consensus or parent-child “joint recalls” among school-aged children. To advance the field of dietary assessment, and evaluate the effectiveness of nutrition education, there is a need to understand how joint recalls are reported in the literature.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To conduct a scoping review concerning the use of parent-child joint dietary recalls among children and the justifications/rationales provided to support their use.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review checklist was used.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Five databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Dietary Assessment Calibration/Validation Register) to identify articles on dietary intake assessment among children aged 6–11. All peer-reviewed studies published in English were eligible except for reviews, meta-analyses, conference abstracts, letters, guidelines, comments, editorials, and case studies/reports.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 5,868 articles identified, 3,652 were excluded based on title and abstract. Of the 2,216 articles that underwent full-text review, 1,415 were excluded (mean age outside >6 and ≤12, no joint recall, no diet recall, not English, duplicate publication, not research study, non-human study, other). Of the 801 articles remaining, 306 were unclear (lacked diet recall details), and 495 met inclusion criteria (with 210 national surveys, 225 cross-sectional studies, 36 cohort studies, 15 randomized controlled trials, and 9 case-control studies). Of these 495, 388 used joint recalls. Preliminary results showed that most (74%) did not cite a validation study to support using joint recalls.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, 38% of 801 articles lacked diet recall details, and 74% of 801 articles failed to cite a reference to support using joint recalls. Results highlight a crucial gap in how the literature describes dietary recalls with school-aged children. Author guidelines to provide details concerning dietary recalls among school-aged children are needed to ensure consistency and improve diet-related nutrition research.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>None</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"56 8\",\"pages\":\"Page S37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S149940462400188X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S149940462400188X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Scoping Review on the Use of Parent-Child Joint Recalls Among School-Aged Children (6–11 Years)
Background
Dietary-intake assessment among children is challenging due to developmental and cognitive immaturity hence, dietary recall is the preferred tool for use with school-aged children. National surveys usually use consensus or parent-child “joint recalls” among school-aged children. To advance the field of dietary assessment, and evaluate the effectiveness of nutrition education, there is a need to understand how joint recalls are reported in the literature.
Objective
To conduct a scoping review concerning the use of parent-child joint dietary recalls among children and the justifications/rationales provided to support their use.
Study Design, Settings, Participants
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review checklist was used.
Measurable Outcome/Analysis
Five databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Dietary Assessment Calibration/Validation Register) to identify articles on dietary intake assessment among children aged 6–11. All peer-reviewed studies published in English were eligible except for reviews, meta-analyses, conference abstracts, letters, guidelines, comments, editorials, and case studies/reports.
Results
Of the 5,868 articles identified, 3,652 were excluded based on title and abstract. Of the 2,216 articles that underwent full-text review, 1,415 were excluded (mean age outside >6 and ≤12, no joint recall, no diet recall, not English, duplicate publication, not research study, non-human study, other). Of the 801 articles remaining, 306 were unclear (lacked diet recall details), and 495 met inclusion criteria (with 210 national surveys, 225 cross-sectional studies, 36 cohort studies, 15 randomized controlled trials, and 9 case-control studies). Of these 495, 388 used joint recalls. Preliminary results showed that most (74%) did not cite a validation study to support using joint recalls.
Conclusions
Overall, 38% of 801 articles lacked diet recall details, and 74% of 801 articles failed to cite a reference to support using joint recalls. Results highlight a crucial gap in how the literature describes dietary recalls with school-aged children. Author guidelines to provide details concerning dietary recalls among school-aged children are needed to ensure consistency and improve diet-related nutrition research.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas.
The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.