基于深度学习的 OCT 图像聚类用于发现老年性黄斑变性的生物标记物(PINNACLE 研究报告 4)

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Robbie Holland MEng , Rebecca Kaye MD , Ahmed M. Hagag MD , Oliver Leingang PhD , Thomas R.P. Taylor MD , Hrvoje Bogunović PhD , Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth MD , Hendrik P.N. Scholl MD , Daniel Rueckert PhD , Andrew J. Lotery MD , Sobha Sivaprasad MD , Martin J. Menten PhD
{"title":"基于深度学习的 OCT 图像聚类用于发现老年性黄斑变性的生物标记物(PINNACLE 研究报告 4)","authors":"Robbie Holland MEng ,&nbsp;Rebecca Kaye MD ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Hagag MD ,&nbsp;Oliver Leingang PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas R.P. Taylor MD ,&nbsp;Hrvoje Bogunović PhD ,&nbsp;Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth MD ,&nbsp;Hendrik P.N. Scholl MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Rueckert PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Lotery MD ,&nbsp;Sobha Sivaprasad MD ,&nbsp;Martin J. Menten PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We introduce a deep learning–based biomarker proposal system for the purpose of accelerating biomarker discovery in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective analysis of a large data set of retinal OCT images.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A total of 3456 adults aged between 51 and 102 years whose OCT images were collected under the PINNACLE project.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our system proposes candidates for novel AMD imaging biomarkers in OCT. It works by first training a neural network using self-supervised contrastive learning to discover, without any clinical annotations, features relating to both known and unknown AMD biomarkers present in 46 496 retinal OCT images. To interpret the learned biomarkers, we partition the images into 30 subsets, termed clusters, that contain similar features. We conduct 2 parallel 1.5-hour semistructured interviews with 2 independent teams of retinal specialists to assign descriptions in clinical language to each cluster. Descriptions of clusters achieving consensus can potentially inform new biomarker candidates.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>We checked if each cluster showed clear features comprehensible to retinal specialists, if they related to AMD, and how many described established biomarkers used in grading systems as opposed to recently proposed or potentially new biomarkers. We also compared their prognostic value for late-stage wet and dry AMD against an established clinical grading system and a demographic baseline model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, both teams independently identified clearly distinct characteristics in 27 of 30 clusters, of which 23 were related to AMD. Seven were recognized as known biomarkers used in established grading systems, and 16 depicted biomarker combinations or subtypes that are either not yet used in grading systems, were only recently proposed, or were unknown. Clusters separated incomplete from complete retinal atrophy, intraretinal from subretinal fluid, and thick from thin choroids, and, in simulation, outperformed clinically used grading systems in prognostic value.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Using self-supervised deep learning, we were able to automatically propose AMD biomarkers going beyond the set used in clinically established grading systems. Without any clinical annotations, contrastive learning discovered subtle differences between fine-grained biomarkers. Ultimately, we envision that equipping clinicians with discovery-oriented deep learning tools can accelerate the discovery of novel prognostic biomarkers.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000794/pdfft?md5=871d81d60ba0cb5d1ab13c6991aa394a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666914524000794-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning–Based Clustering of OCT Images for Biomarker Discovery in Age-Related Macular Degeneration (PINNACLE Study Report 4)\",\"authors\":\"Robbie Holland MEng ,&nbsp;Rebecca Kaye MD ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Hagag MD ,&nbsp;Oliver Leingang PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas R.P. Taylor MD ,&nbsp;Hrvoje Bogunović PhD ,&nbsp;Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth MD ,&nbsp;Hendrik P.N. Scholl MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Rueckert PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Lotery MD ,&nbsp;Sobha Sivaprasad MD ,&nbsp;Martin J. Menten PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We introduce a deep learning–based biomarker proposal system for the purpose of accelerating biomarker discovery in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective analysis of a large data set of retinal OCT images.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>A total of 3456 adults aged between 51 and 102 years whose OCT images were collected under the PINNACLE project.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our system proposes candidates for novel AMD imaging biomarkers in OCT. It works by first training a neural network using self-supervised contrastive learning to discover, without any clinical annotations, features relating to both known and unknown AMD biomarkers present in 46 496 retinal OCT images. To interpret the learned biomarkers, we partition the images into 30 subsets, termed clusters, that contain similar features. We conduct 2 parallel 1.5-hour semistructured interviews with 2 independent teams of retinal specialists to assign descriptions in clinical language to each cluster. Descriptions of clusters achieving consensus can potentially inform new biomarker candidates.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>We checked if each cluster showed clear features comprehensible to retinal specialists, if they related to AMD, and how many described established biomarkers used in grading systems as opposed to recently proposed or potentially new biomarkers. We also compared their prognostic value for late-stage wet and dry AMD against an established clinical grading system and a demographic baseline model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, both teams independently identified clearly distinct characteristics in 27 of 30 clusters, of which 23 were related to AMD. Seven were recognized as known biomarkers used in established grading systems, and 16 depicted biomarker combinations or subtypes that are either not yet used in grading systems, were only recently proposed, or were unknown. Clusters separated incomplete from complete retinal atrophy, intraretinal from subretinal fluid, and thick from thin choroids, and, in simulation, outperformed clinically used grading systems in prognostic value.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Using self-supervised deep learning, we were able to automatically propose AMD biomarkers going beyond the set used in clinically established grading systems. Without any clinical annotations, contrastive learning discovered subtle differences between fine-grained biomarkers. Ultimately, we envision that equipping clinicians with discovery-oriented deep learning tools can accelerate the discovery of novel prognostic biomarkers.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000794/pdfft?md5=871d81d60ba0cb5d1ab13c6991aa394a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666914524000794-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524000794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们介绍了一种基于深度学习的生物标记物提议系统,旨在加速发现老年性黄斑变性(AMD)的生物标记物。方法我们的系统提出了 OCT 中新型 AMD 成像生物标记物的候选者。该系统首先利用自监督对比学习训练神经网络,在没有任何临床注释的情况下,发现 46 496 张视网膜 OCT 图像中与已知和未知 AMD 生物标志物相关的特征。为了解释学习到的生物标志物,我们将图像划分为 30 个包含相似特征的子集,称为集群。我们与两个独立的视网膜专家团队同时进行了 2 次长达 1.5 小时的半结构化访谈,为每个群组分配临床语言描述。主要结果测量我们检查了每个群组是否显示出视网膜专家可以理解的清晰特征,是否与 AMD 有关,以及有多少群组描述了分级系统中使用的成熟生物标记物,而不是最近提出的或潜在的新生物标记物。我们还将它们对晚期湿性和干性 AMD 的预后价值与已建立的临床分级系统和人口学基线模型进行了比较。其中 7 个被认为是已建立的分级系统中使用的已知生物标志物,16 个描述了尚未用于分级系统、最近才提出或未知的生物标志物组合或亚型。聚类区分了不完全视网膜萎缩和完全视网膜萎缩、视网膜内积液和视网膜下积液、厚脉络膜和薄脉络膜,在模拟中,其预后价值优于临床使用的分级系统。在没有任何临床注释的情况下,对比学习发现了细粒度生物标志物之间的微妙差异。最终,我们认为,为临床医生配备以发现为导向的深度学习工具可以加速新型预后生物标志物的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning–Based Clustering of OCT Images for Biomarker Discovery in Age-Related Macular Degeneration (PINNACLE Study Report 4)

Purpose

We introduce a deep learning–based biomarker proposal system for the purpose of accelerating biomarker discovery in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Design

Retrospective analysis of a large data set of retinal OCT images.

Participants

A total of 3456 adults aged between 51 and 102 years whose OCT images were collected under the PINNACLE project.

Methods

Our system proposes candidates for novel AMD imaging biomarkers in OCT. It works by first training a neural network using self-supervised contrastive learning to discover, without any clinical annotations, features relating to both known and unknown AMD biomarkers present in 46 496 retinal OCT images. To interpret the learned biomarkers, we partition the images into 30 subsets, termed clusters, that contain similar features. We conduct 2 parallel 1.5-hour semistructured interviews with 2 independent teams of retinal specialists to assign descriptions in clinical language to each cluster. Descriptions of clusters achieving consensus can potentially inform new biomarker candidates.

Main Outcome Measures

We checked if each cluster showed clear features comprehensible to retinal specialists, if they related to AMD, and how many described established biomarkers used in grading systems as opposed to recently proposed or potentially new biomarkers. We also compared their prognostic value for late-stage wet and dry AMD against an established clinical grading system and a demographic baseline model.

Results

Overall, both teams independently identified clearly distinct characteristics in 27 of 30 clusters, of which 23 were related to AMD. Seven were recognized as known biomarkers used in established grading systems, and 16 depicted biomarker combinations or subtypes that are either not yet used in grading systems, were only recently proposed, or were unknown. Clusters separated incomplete from complete retinal atrophy, intraretinal from subretinal fluid, and thick from thin choroids, and, in simulation, outperformed clinically used grading systems in prognostic value.

Conclusions

Using self-supervised deep learning, we were able to automatically propose AMD biomarkers going beyond the set used in clinically established grading systems. Without any clinical annotations, contrastive learning discovered subtle differences between fine-grained biomarkers. Ultimately, we envision that equipping clinicians with discovery-oriented deep learning tools can accelerate the discovery of novel prognostic biomarkers.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信