Arc of avoidance: An analytical framework for analysing mining companies’ actions in the global South

Given the relationship between mineral extraction and conflict, human rights violations, and environmental degradation, there is an urgent need to examine how to mitigate harm in a more mineral intensive future. Thus far the literature has focused on two areas, the governance gaps present in the global governance of multinationals and the private governance scholarship which examines the rule-making power of mining firms. This paper argues that this story of mining firms' power is incomplete. Mining MNCs not only make rules, they also actively avoid regulations put in place to temper their impact on communities. To address this, the paper develops a chronological ‘arc of avoidance’, detailing the methods by which mining firms evade their fiscal and legal obligations to host communities. These methods include negotiation of tax concessions, tax avoidance, closing avenues of redress, and abandonment of mines without recourse. Using the case study of Paladin Energy, the paper confirms the power of large MNCs over governments and citizens of the Global South. It demonstrates that mining MNCs engage in avoidance tactics throughout the life of a mine, and that their power over host states does not weaken once investment has been made. Such tactics lead to entrenched negative outcomes for mining communities in the Global South. The findings reveal the full extent to which firms accrue the benefits and avoid the consequences of mineral extraction throughout the production process, and are of particular significance as we shift to extracting the resources required for the uptake of renewable energy.