阳离子交换容量--调查垃圾填埋场地质屏障的另一种方法?

IF 5.3 2区 地球科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Zora Alice Kumm, Susanne Gier
{"title":"阳离子交换容量--调查垃圾填埋场地质屏障的另一种方法?","authors":"Zora Alice Kumm,&nbsp;Susanne Gier","doi":"10.1016/j.clay.2024.107513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Clays and clay minerals are ideal raw materials for geological barriers and landfill liners because of their low-hydraulic permeabilities, their swelling properties and adsorption capacities. The geological barrier is a supplementary barrier beneath the body of the landfill, intended to protect the environment from uncontrolled leachate from the waste material. An Austrian standard defines the process for site exploration and the required laboratory tests and parameters for the analysis of the geological barrier. The most important laboratory tests besides grain size analysis are the Atterberg limits and the determination of the clay mineralogy using X-ray diffraction. However, the analysis of the cation exchange capacity (CEC) is not included in the list of laboratory tests. CEC is a numerical value that describes the physical properties of clays, such as the diffusion of charged and uncharged molecules and the cation retention. Hence, the objective of this study is to clarify whether the determination of the CEC using the Cu-trien method represents a possible alternative to currently used laboratory tests.</p><p>For this purpose, three samples (loess, sand and clay) from two landfill sites owned and operated by Zöchling GmbH as well as six mixtures of these samples with varying compositions were examined for their mineralogical, chemical and geotechnical properties. The samples consisted of varying amounts of quartz, feldspar, calcite, dolomite and the clay minerals smectite, illite, kaolinite, vermiculite and chlorite. The results showed that the bulk clay mineralogy correlates well with the Atterberg liquid limit (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.73) and the CEC (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88) and furthermore, the results of the two methods – Atterberg liquid limit and CEC- even correlated better (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.95).</p><p>This demonstrates that the CEC can be an alternative to the Atterberg liquid limit and/or the analysis of the mineralogical composition of the material. Advantages of the CEC are rapidness, its good reproducibility and cost-efficiency of the analyses compared to the other two methods. Based on the results of this study, a partial substitution of the currently used laboratory tests is considered feasible and CEC could at least be used for fast and efficient screening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":245,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clay Science","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 107513"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169131724002618/pdfft?md5=9de210b81f473fb7e19a3f454e1d4f85&pid=1-s2.0-S0169131724002618-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cation exchange capacity- An alternative method to investigate the geological barrier for landfills?\",\"authors\":\"Zora Alice Kumm,&nbsp;Susanne Gier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clay.2024.107513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Clays and clay minerals are ideal raw materials for geological barriers and landfill liners because of their low-hydraulic permeabilities, their swelling properties and adsorption capacities. The geological barrier is a supplementary barrier beneath the body of the landfill, intended to protect the environment from uncontrolled leachate from the waste material. An Austrian standard defines the process for site exploration and the required laboratory tests and parameters for the analysis of the geological barrier. The most important laboratory tests besides grain size analysis are the Atterberg limits and the determination of the clay mineralogy using X-ray diffraction. However, the analysis of the cation exchange capacity (CEC) is not included in the list of laboratory tests. CEC is a numerical value that describes the physical properties of clays, such as the diffusion of charged and uncharged molecules and the cation retention. Hence, the objective of this study is to clarify whether the determination of the CEC using the Cu-trien method represents a possible alternative to currently used laboratory tests.</p><p>For this purpose, three samples (loess, sand and clay) from two landfill sites owned and operated by Zöchling GmbH as well as six mixtures of these samples with varying compositions were examined for their mineralogical, chemical and geotechnical properties. The samples consisted of varying amounts of quartz, feldspar, calcite, dolomite and the clay minerals smectite, illite, kaolinite, vermiculite and chlorite. The results showed that the bulk clay mineralogy correlates well with the Atterberg liquid limit (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.73) and the CEC (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88) and furthermore, the results of the two methods – Atterberg liquid limit and CEC- even correlated better (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.95).</p><p>This demonstrates that the CEC can be an alternative to the Atterberg liquid limit and/or the analysis of the mineralogical composition of the material. Advantages of the CEC are rapidness, its good reproducibility and cost-efficiency of the analyses compared to the other two methods. Based on the results of this study, a partial substitution of the currently used laboratory tests is considered feasible and CEC could at least be used for fast and efficient screening.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clay Science\",\"volume\":\"259 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169131724002618/pdfft?md5=9de210b81f473fb7e19a3f454e1d4f85&pid=1-s2.0-S0169131724002618-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clay Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169131724002618\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clay Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169131724002618","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粘土和粘土矿物具有低水力渗透性、膨胀特性和吸附能力,是地质屏障和垃圾填埋场衬里的理想原材料。地质屏障是垃圾填埋场主体下方的一个补充屏障,旨在保护环境不受不受控制的废料渗滤液的影响。奥地利的一项标准规定了场地勘探过程以及分析地质屏障所需的实验室测试和参数。除粒度分析外,最重要的实验室测试是阿特伯格极限和使用 X 射线衍射测定粘土矿物学。不过,阳离子交换容量(CEC)分析不在实验室测试之列。阳离子交换容量是一个数值,用于描述粘土的物理特性,如带电和不带电分子的扩散以及阳离子的保留。因此,本研究的目的是澄清使用铜-三烯酸法测定 CEC 是否可以替代目前使用的实验室测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cation exchange capacity- An alternative method to investigate the geological barrier for landfills?

Clays and clay minerals are ideal raw materials for geological barriers and landfill liners because of their low-hydraulic permeabilities, their swelling properties and adsorption capacities. The geological barrier is a supplementary barrier beneath the body of the landfill, intended to protect the environment from uncontrolled leachate from the waste material. An Austrian standard defines the process for site exploration and the required laboratory tests and parameters for the analysis of the geological barrier. The most important laboratory tests besides grain size analysis are the Atterberg limits and the determination of the clay mineralogy using X-ray diffraction. However, the analysis of the cation exchange capacity (CEC) is not included in the list of laboratory tests. CEC is a numerical value that describes the physical properties of clays, such as the diffusion of charged and uncharged molecules and the cation retention. Hence, the objective of this study is to clarify whether the determination of the CEC using the Cu-trien method represents a possible alternative to currently used laboratory tests.

For this purpose, three samples (loess, sand and clay) from two landfill sites owned and operated by Zöchling GmbH as well as six mixtures of these samples with varying compositions were examined for their mineralogical, chemical and geotechnical properties. The samples consisted of varying amounts of quartz, feldspar, calcite, dolomite and the clay minerals smectite, illite, kaolinite, vermiculite and chlorite. The results showed that the bulk clay mineralogy correlates well with the Atterberg liquid limit (R2 = 0.73) and the CEC (R2 = 0.88) and furthermore, the results of the two methods – Atterberg liquid limit and CEC- even correlated better (R2 = 0.95).

This demonstrates that the CEC can be an alternative to the Atterberg liquid limit and/or the analysis of the mineralogical composition of the material. Advantages of the CEC are rapidness, its good reproducibility and cost-efficiency of the analyses compared to the other two methods. Based on the results of this study, a partial substitution of the currently used laboratory tests is considered feasible and CEC could at least be used for fast and efficient screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clay Science
Applied Clay Science 地学-矿物学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Applied Clay Science aims to be an international journal attracting high quality scientific papers on clays and clay minerals, including research papers, reviews, and technical notes. The journal covers typical subjects of Fundamental and Applied Clay Science such as: • Synthesis and purification • Structural, crystallographic and mineralogical properties of clays and clay minerals • Thermal properties of clays and clay minerals • Physico-chemical properties including i) surface and interface properties; ii) thermodynamic properties; iii) mechanical properties • Interaction with water, with polar and apolar molecules • Colloidal properties and rheology • Adsorption, Intercalation, Ionic exchange • Genesis and deposits of clay minerals • Geology and geochemistry of clays • Modification of clays and clay minerals properties by thermal and physical treatments • Modification by chemical treatments with organic and inorganic molecules(organoclays, pillared clays) • Modification by biological microorganisms. etc...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信