{"title":"Cistus ladanifer L.、Pistacia lentiscus L.和 Matricaria chamomilla L.精油的化学成分和生物活性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2024.104880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this study was to characterize the volatile compounds from the aerial part of <em>Cistus ladanifer</em> L., <em>Pistacia lentiscus</em> L., and <em>Matricaria chamomilla</em> L., members of <em>Cistaceae</em>, Anacardiaceae, and Asteraceae families, respectively; and assess their potential antioxidant, antimicrobial, and enzyme inhibitory properties. The essential oils were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS-MS) analysis. The outcomes revealed distinct chemical profiles indicative of specific chemotypes within each species. Indeed, <em>M. chamomilla</em> essential oil (MCEO) contained sabinene (16.03 %), camphor (11.22 %), 3,6-dihydrochamazulene (14.22 %), and chamazulene (12.84 %) as its primary constituents. <em>C. ladanifer</em> essential oil (CLEO) prominently featured camphene (31.5 %), α-pinene (15.76%), and bornyl acetate (15.73 %), while <em>P. lentiscus</em> essential oil (PLEO) was rich in D-limonene (21 %), β-myrcene (14.89 %), α-pinene (13.93 %), and terpinen-4-ol (9.75 %). Remarkably, PLEO exhibited significant antioxidant activity across multiple assays, demonstrating inhibitory values of 72.07 ± 4.06 mg TE/g of extract (Cuprac), 45.74 ± 1.23 mg TE/g of extract (FRAP), 30.89 ± 1.69 mg EDTAE/g of extract (Chelating), 26.71 ± 1.84 mmol TE/g of extract (Phosphomolybdenum), 15.55 ± 0.84 mg TE/g of extract (ABTS), and 2.30 ± 0.22 mg TE/g of extract (DPPH). The results showed that the microorganisms under examination varied in their sensitivity to essential oils and the inhibitory zone ranged between 25 and 57 mm. The inhibitory effects of the essential oils were investigated against enzymes associated with human pathologies. As findings, CLEO demonstrated substantial inhibition of tyrosinase (10.22 ± 0.13 mg KAE/g of extract) and acetylcholinesterase (4.71 ± 0.97 mg GALAE/g of extract), outperforming other essential oils that displayed moderate activities. These important biological effects of the oils tested qualify these plants as an interesting source of phytochemicals with medicinal actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemical composition and bioactivity of essential oils from Cistus ladanifer L., Pistacia lentiscus L., and Matricaria chamomilla L\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bse.2024.104880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of this study was to characterize the volatile compounds from the aerial part of <em>Cistus ladanifer</em> L., <em>Pistacia lentiscus</em> L., and <em>Matricaria chamomilla</em> L., members of <em>Cistaceae</em>, Anacardiaceae, and Asteraceae families, respectively; and assess their potential antioxidant, antimicrobial, and enzyme inhibitory properties. The essential oils were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS-MS) analysis. The outcomes revealed distinct chemical profiles indicative of specific chemotypes within each species. Indeed, <em>M. chamomilla</em> essential oil (MCEO) contained sabinene (16.03 %), camphor (11.22 %), 3,6-dihydrochamazulene (14.22 %), and chamazulene (12.84 %) as its primary constituents. <em>C. ladanifer</em> essential oil (CLEO) prominently featured camphene (31.5 %), α-pinene (15.76%), and bornyl acetate (15.73 %), while <em>P. lentiscus</em> essential oil (PLEO) was rich in D-limonene (21 %), β-myrcene (14.89 %), α-pinene (13.93 %), and terpinen-4-ol (9.75 %). Remarkably, PLEO exhibited significant antioxidant activity across multiple assays, demonstrating inhibitory values of 72.07 ± 4.06 mg TE/g of extract (Cuprac), 45.74 ± 1.23 mg TE/g of extract (FRAP), 30.89 ± 1.69 mg EDTAE/g of extract (Chelating), 26.71 ± 1.84 mmol TE/g of extract (Phosphomolybdenum), 15.55 ± 0.84 mg TE/g of extract (ABTS), and 2.30 ± 0.22 mg TE/g of extract (DPPH). The results showed that the microorganisms under examination varied in their sensitivity to essential oils and the inhibitory zone ranged between 25 and 57 mm. The inhibitory effects of the essential oils were investigated against enzymes associated with human pathologies. As findings, CLEO demonstrated substantial inhibition of tyrosinase (10.22 ± 0.13 mg KAE/g of extract) and acetylcholinesterase (4.71 ± 0.97 mg GALAE/g of extract), outperforming other essential oils that displayed moderate activities. These important biological effects of the oils tested qualify these plants as an interesting source of phytochemicals with medicinal actions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030519782400098X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030519782400098X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chemical composition and bioactivity of essential oils from Cistus ladanifer L., Pistacia lentiscus L., and Matricaria chamomilla L
The objective of this study was to characterize the volatile compounds from the aerial part of Cistus ladanifer L., Pistacia lentiscus L., and Matricaria chamomilla L., members of Cistaceae, Anacardiaceae, and Asteraceae families, respectively; and assess their potential antioxidant, antimicrobial, and enzyme inhibitory properties. The essential oils were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS-MS) analysis. The outcomes revealed distinct chemical profiles indicative of specific chemotypes within each species. Indeed, M. chamomilla essential oil (MCEO) contained sabinene (16.03 %), camphor (11.22 %), 3,6-dihydrochamazulene (14.22 %), and chamazulene (12.84 %) as its primary constituents. C. ladanifer essential oil (CLEO) prominently featured camphene (31.5 %), α-pinene (15.76%), and bornyl acetate (15.73 %), while P. lentiscus essential oil (PLEO) was rich in D-limonene (21 %), β-myrcene (14.89 %), α-pinene (13.93 %), and terpinen-4-ol (9.75 %). Remarkably, PLEO exhibited significant antioxidant activity across multiple assays, demonstrating inhibitory values of 72.07 ± 4.06 mg TE/g of extract (Cuprac), 45.74 ± 1.23 mg TE/g of extract (FRAP), 30.89 ± 1.69 mg EDTAE/g of extract (Chelating), 26.71 ± 1.84 mmol TE/g of extract (Phosphomolybdenum), 15.55 ± 0.84 mg TE/g of extract (ABTS), and 2.30 ± 0.22 mg TE/g of extract (DPPH). The results showed that the microorganisms under examination varied in their sensitivity to essential oils and the inhibitory zone ranged between 25 and 57 mm. The inhibitory effects of the essential oils were investigated against enzymes associated with human pathologies. As findings, CLEO demonstrated substantial inhibition of tyrosinase (10.22 ± 0.13 mg KAE/g of extract) and acetylcholinesterase (4.71 ± 0.97 mg GALAE/g of extract), outperforming other essential oils that displayed moderate activities. These important biological effects of the oils tested qualify these plants as an interesting source of phytochemicals with medicinal actions.
期刊介绍：
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology).
In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
