实地监测揭示了在不影响产量的情况下减少荷兰马铃薯种植对环境影响的空间

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arie Pieter Paulus Ravensbergen , Martin K. van Ittersum , Renske Hijbeek , Corné Kempenaar , Pytrik Reidsma
{"title":"实地监测揭示了在不影响产量的情况下减少荷兰马铃薯种植对环境影响的空间","authors":"Arie Pieter Paulus Ravensbergen ,&nbsp;Martin K. van Ittersum ,&nbsp;Renske Hijbeek ,&nbsp;Corné Kempenaar ,&nbsp;Pytrik Reidsma","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Intensification of arable farming in Northwest Europe has led to high yields. However, inadequate use of external inputs such as nutrients, irrigation water and crop protection products has contributed to several environmental problems, such as nitrate leaching and losses of crop protection products. There is a need to reduce environmental losses and contribute to a more circular and sustainable agriculture in Northwest Europe.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Here, we take ware potato production in the Netherlands as an example cropping system to assess if there is scope to reduce input levels and environmental impact of nutrient, water and crop protection product use without compromising yield.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We determined variability in use and use efficiency of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and pesticides as well as water productivity (WP) and yields of 96 on-farm ware potato fields in the Netherlands, on both clay and sandy soils. In addition, we assessed if relatively high performance could be achieved on multiple environmental indicators simultaneously.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>Average N surplus was 265 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> on clay soils and 139 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> on sandy soils and varied among fields by a factor three. Phosphorus and K input exceeded P and K output on clay soils by 33 and 105 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, while on sandy soils P and K balances were close to zero. Mean WP was 43 kg dry matter (DM) mm<sup>−1</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup> and ranged from 30 to 60 kg DM mm<sup>−1</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup> for both soil types. In terms of crop protection product use, lowest and highest use differed by a factor four. Unexpectedly, yields did not increase with higher input rates, suggesting that lower input rates are sufficient to obtain current yields. Consequently, input rates were the most important drivers to explain variability in resource use efficiency and environmental impacts. At the same time, a comparison across multiple indicators simultaneously showed that it was possible to achieve relatively high yields with relatively low N surplus, high WP, and low crop protection product use. Hence, environmental impact could decrease substantially if all fields performed similar to the best performing fields.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This study showed that it seems feasible to maintain high yield levels while reducing resource use in a substantial share of the potato production fields in the Netherlands. If put in practice, this will reduce losses to the environment and therefore contribute to a more sustainable but still productive agriculture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 104091"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002415/pdfft?md5=184a46e9d6af84ef206535baeca9c2c1&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24002415-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field monitoring reveals scope to reduce environmental impact of ware potato cultivation in the Netherlands without compromising yield\",\"authors\":\"Arie Pieter Paulus Ravensbergen ,&nbsp;Martin K. van Ittersum ,&nbsp;Renske Hijbeek ,&nbsp;Corné Kempenaar ,&nbsp;Pytrik Reidsma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Intensification of arable farming in Northwest Europe has led to high yields. However, inadequate use of external inputs such as nutrients, irrigation water and crop protection products has contributed to several environmental problems, such as nitrate leaching and losses of crop protection products. There is a need to reduce environmental losses and contribute to a more circular and sustainable agriculture in Northwest Europe.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Here, we take ware potato production in the Netherlands as an example cropping system to assess if there is scope to reduce input levels and environmental impact of nutrient, water and crop protection product use without compromising yield.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We determined variability in use and use efficiency of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and pesticides as well as water productivity (WP) and yields of 96 on-farm ware potato fields in the Netherlands, on both clay and sandy soils. In addition, we assessed if relatively high performance could be achieved on multiple environmental indicators simultaneously.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>Average N surplus was 265 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> on clay soils and 139 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> on sandy soils and varied among fields by a factor three. Phosphorus and K input exceeded P and K output on clay soils by 33 and 105 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, while on sandy soils P and K balances were close to zero. Mean WP was 43 kg dry matter (DM) mm<sup>−1</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup> and ranged from 30 to 60 kg DM mm<sup>−1</sup> ha<sup>−1</sup> for both soil types. In terms of crop protection product use, lowest and highest use differed by a factor four. Unexpectedly, yields did not increase with higher input rates, suggesting that lower input rates are sufficient to obtain current yields. Consequently, input rates were the most important drivers to explain variability in resource use efficiency and environmental impacts. At the same time, a comparison across multiple indicators simultaneously showed that it was possible to achieve relatively high yields with relatively low N surplus, high WP, and low crop protection product use. Hence, environmental impact could decrease substantially if all fields performed similar to the best performing fields.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This study showed that it seems feasible to maintain high yield levels while reducing resource use in a substantial share of the potato production fields in the Netherlands. If put in practice, this will reduce losses to the environment and therefore contribute to a more sustainable but still productive agriculture.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002415/pdfft?md5=184a46e9d6af84ef206535baeca9c2c1&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24002415-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002415\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002415","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西北欧的耕地耕作集约化带来了高产。然而,养分、灌溉水和作物保护产品等外部投入的使用不足导致了一些环境问题,如硝酸盐沥滤和作物保护产品的损失。有必要减少环境损失,促进西北欧农业的循环和可持续发展。在此,我们以荷兰的马铃薯生产为例,评估在不影响产量的情况下,是否有可能降低养分、水和作物保护产品的投入水平和对环境的影响。我们确定了荷兰 96 块粘土和沙土农田马铃薯氮(N)、磷(P)、钾(K)和农药使用量和使用效率的变化,以及水分生产率(WP)和产量。此外,我们还评估了是否可以同时在多个环境指标上实现相对较高的绩效。粘土的平均氮过剩量为 265 千克/公顷,沙土的平均氮过剩量为 139 千克/公顷,不同田块之间的差异为 3 倍。在粘土上,磷和钾的输入量分别超出磷和钾的输出量 33 千克/公顷和 105 千克/公顷,而在沙土上,磷和钾的平衡接近零。两种土壤类型的平均可湿性粉剂(WP)为 43 千克干物质(DM)毫米公顷,介于 30 至 60 千克 DM 毫米公顷之间。在作物保护产品使用方面,最低和最高使用量相差 4 倍。出乎意料的是,产量并没有随着投入率的提高而增加,这表明较低的投入率足以获得当前的产量。因此,投入率是解释资源利用效率和环境影响变化的最重要驱动因素。同时,多个指标的比较表明,在氮过剩量相对较低、可湿性粉剂用量较高和作物保护产品用量较低的情况下,也有可能获得相对较高的产量。因此,如果所有田块的表现都与表现最好的田块相似,那么对环境的影响就会大大降低。这项研究表明,在荷兰相当一部分马铃薯生产田中保持高产水平同时减少资源使用似乎是可行的。如果付诸实践,这将减少对环境造成的损失,从而有助于实现更可持续但仍然高产的农业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Field monitoring reveals scope to reduce environmental impact of ware potato cultivation in the Netherlands without compromising yield

Field monitoring reveals scope to reduce environmental impact of ware potato cultivation in the Netherlands without compromising yield

Context

Intensification of arable farming in Northwest Europe has led to high yields. However, inadequate use of external inputs such as nutrients, irrigation water and crop protection products has contributed to several environmental problems, such as nitrate leaching and losses of crop protection products. There is a need to reduce environmental losses and contribute to a more circular and sustainable agriculture in Northwest Europe.

Objective

Here, we take ware potato production in the Netherlands as an example cropping system to assess if there is scope to reduce input levels and environmental impact of nutrient, water and crop protection product use without compromising yield.

Methods

We determined variability in use and use efficiency of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and pesticides as well as water productivity (WP) and yields of 96 on-farm ware potato fields in the Netherlands, on both clay and sandy soils. In addition, we assessed if relatively high performance could be achieved on multiple environmental indicators simultaneously.

Results and conclusions

Average N surplus was 265 kg N ha−1 on clay soils and 139 kg N ha−1 on sandy soils and varied among fields by a factor three. Phosphorus and K input exceeded P and K output on clay soils by 33 and 105 kg ha−1, respectively, while on sandy soils P and K balances were close to zero. Mean WP was 43 kg dry matter (DM) mm−1 ha−1 and ranged from 30 to 60 kg DM mm−1 ha−1 for both soil types. In terms of crop protection product use, lowest and highest use differed by a factor four. Unexpectedly, yields did not increase with higher input rates, suggesting that lower input rates are sufficient to obtain current yields. Consequently, input rates were the most important drivers to explain variability in resource use efficiency and environmental impacts. At the same time, a comparison across multiple indicators simultaneously showed that it was possible to achieve relatively high yields with relatively low N surplus, high WP, and low crop protection product use. Hence, environmental impact could decrease substantially if all fields performed similar to the best performing fields.

Significance

This study showed that it seems feasible to maintain high yield levels while reducing resource use in a substantial share of the potato production fields in the Netherlands. If put in practice, this will reduce losses to the environment and therefore contribute to a more sustainable but still productive agriculture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信