利用多物理场-电路耦合方法比较分析控制策略对 IGBT 功率模块功率损耗的影响

IF 1.8 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Zhifeng Dou, Changai Zhang, Ye Tian, Falong Lu, Qian Wang
{"title":"利用多物理场-电路耦合方法比较分析控制策略对 IGBT 功率模块功率损耗的影响","authors":"Zhifeng Dou, Changai Zhang, Ye Tian, Falong Lu, Qian Wang","doi":"10.1002/cta.4219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Power losses in semiconductor devices present a significant impediment to advancing power electronics systems for achieving higher frequencies, improved efficiency, and greater integration. A major challenge lies in directly coupling power losses with various control strategies, considering the variations in manufacturers, packaging, and process structures within the power electronics field. This paper introduces a field‐circuit coupling simulation methodology of the insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) within the Simulink/COMSOL environment, using a conventional three‐phase six‐switch voltage source inverter (VSI) IGBT module as a case study. A composite transfer function interconnects the electrical and thermal aspects, enabling bidirectional coupling between IGBT temperature and losses. This study aims to comprehensively compare the effects of various control strategies, namely, single‐vector, dual‐vector, and three‐vector current model predictive control (CMPC) and space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM), on the losses and temperature of IGBT power modules. The findings emphasize that losses are significantly influenced by the selection of weighting factor coefficients and power factor settings under the same CMPC control strategy with a fixed switching frequency. Additionally, the selection of control strategies, such as CMPC and SVPWM, substantially impacts power losses in power electronic devices.","PeriodicalId":13874,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of control strategies impact on power losses in IGBT power modules with a multiphysics‐circuit coupling method\",\"authors\":\"Zhifeng Dou, Changai Zhang, Ye Tian, Falong Lu, Qian Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cta.4219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Power losses in semiconductor devices present a significant impediment to advancing power electronics systems for achieving higher frequencies, improved efficiency, and greater integration. A major challenge lies in directly coupling power losses with various control strategies, considering the variations in manufacturers, packaging, and process structures within the power electronics field. This paper introduces a field‐circuit coupling simulation methodology of the insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) within the Simulink/COMSOL environment, using a conventional three‐phase six‐switch voltage source inverter (VSI) IGBT module as a case study. A composite transfer function interconnects the electrical and thermal aspects, enabling bidirectional coupling between IGBT temperature and losses. This study aims to comprehensively compare the effects of various control strategies, namely, single‐vector, dual‐vector, and three‐vector current model predictive control (CMPC) and space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM), on the losses and temperature of IGBT power modules. The findings emphasize that losses are significantly influenced by the selection of weighting factor coefficients and power factor settings under the same CMPC control strategy with a fixed switching frequency. Additionally, the selection of control strategies, such as CMPC and SVPWM, substantially impacts power losses in power electronic devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.4219\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.4219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

半导体器件的功率损耗严重阻碍了电力电子系统的发展,不利于实现更高的频率、更高的效率和更大的集成度。考虑到电力电子领域中制造商、封装和工艺结构的差异,将功率损耗与各种控制策略直接耦合是一大挑战。本文以传统的三相六开关电压源逆变器 (VSI) IGBT 模块为例,在 Simulink/COMSOL 环境中介绍了绝缘栅双极晶体管 (IGBT) 的现场电路耦合仿真方法。复合传递函数将电气和热方面相互关联,实现了 IGBT 温度和损耗之间的双向耦合。本研究旨在全面比较各种控制策略(即单矢量、双矢量和三矢量电流模型预测控制(CMPC)和空间矢量脉宽调制(SVPWM))对 IGBT 功率模块损耗和温度的影响。研究结果表明,在相同的 CMPC 控制策略和固定开关频率下,加权系数的选择和功率因数的设置对损耗有显著影响。此外,CMPC 和 SVPWM 等控制策略的选择也会对电力电子设备的功率损耗产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of control strategies impact on power losses in IGBT power modules with a multiphysics‐circuit coupling method
Power losses in semiconductor devices present a significant impediment to advancing power electronics systems for achieving higher frequencies, improved efficiency, and greater integration. A major challenge lies in directly coupling power losses with various control strategies, considering the variations in manufacturers, packaging, and process structures within the power electronics field. This paper introduces a field‐circuit coupling simulation methodology of the insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) within the Simulink/COMSOL environment, using a conventional three‐phase six‐switch voltage source inverter (VSI) IGBT module as a case study. A composite transfer function interconnects the electrical and thermal aspects, enabling bidirectional coupling between IGBT temperature and losses. This study aims to comprehensively compare the effects of various control strategies, namely, single‐vector, dual‐vector, and three‐vector current model predictive control (CMPC) and space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM), on the losses and temperature of IGBT power modules. The findings emphasize that losses are significantly influenced by the selection of weighting factor coefficients and power factor settings under the same CMPC control strategy with a fixed switching frequency. Additionally, the selection of control strategies, such as CMPC and SVPWM, substantially impacts power losses in power electronic devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications
International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
34.80%
发文量
277
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The scope of the Journal comprises all aspects of the theory and design of analog and digital circuits together with the application of the ideas and techniques of circuit theory in other fields of science and engineering. Examples of the areas covered include: Fundamental Circuit Theory together with its mathematical and computational aspects; Circuit modeling of devices; Synthesis and design of filters and active circuits; Neural networks; Nonlinear and chaotic circuits; Signal processing and VLSI; Distributed, switched and digital circuits; Power electronics; Solid state devices. Contributions to CAD and simulation are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信