评估德克萨斯高原西瓜生产的三种灌溉应用系统

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Andrea Leiva Soto, Rajan Shrestha, Qingwu Xue, Paul Colaizzi, Susan O'Shaughnessy, Fekede Workneh, Ranjeeta Adhikari, Charles Rush
{"title":"评估德克萨斯高原西瓜生产的三种灌溉应用系统","authors":"Andrea Leiva Soto,&nbsp;Rajan Shrestha,&nbsp;Qingwu Xue,&nbsp;Paul Colaizzi,&nbsp;Susan O'Shaughnessy,&nbsp;Fekede Workneh,&nbsp;Ranjeeta Adhikari,&nbsp;Charles Rush","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>About 90% of the Texas High Plains area depends on the water supply from the Ogallala aquifer. The decline of the Ogallala water table raises a concern for the sustainability of producing the traditional irrigated field crops due to their high water demand. Thus, diversifying cropping systems may be a solution. However, about 70% of the irrigated cropland uses center pivots that may negatively impact specialty crop quality. Thus, a 3-year experiment was conducted to assess the potential of using mobile drip irrigation (MDI) to produce fresh watermelon compared to center pivot sprinkler irrigation using low-elevation spray application (LESA), and surface drip irrigation with plastic mulch (DI). The study evaluated the effects of irrigation systems on crop yield, fruit quality, physiological responses, water use efficiency (WUE), and irrigation use efficiency (IUE). On average, plants under MDI had higher yields (106 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) than those under DI (70 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and LESA (68 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>). Plants under MDI and DI also had more fruits per plant (1.9) than those under LESA (1.4). The higher yield was associated with higher biomass and photosynthetic function. In general, fruit quality was not affected by irrigation system. In addition, plants under MDI system showed a higher WUE and IUE, and less water stress than those under LESA and DI systems. Results of this study suggest that irrigating under an MDI system is a good alternative for growers in the Texas High Plains that aim to diversify their cropping system with high-value vegetable crops such as watermelon (<i>Citrullus lanatus</i>).</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 5","pages":"2535-2550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21653","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of three irrigation application systems for watermelon production in the Texas High Plains\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Leiva Soto,&nbsp;Rajan Shrestha,&nbsp;Qingwu Xue,&nbsp;Paul Colaizzi,&nbsp;Susan O'Shaughnessy,&nbsp;Fekede Workneh,&nbsp;Ranjeeta Adhikari,&nbsp;Charles Rush\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>About 90% of the Texas High Plains area depends on the water supply from the Ogallala aquifer. The decline of the Ogallala water table raises a concern for the sustainability of producing the traditional irrigated field crops due to their high water demand. Thus, diversifying cropping systems may be a solution. However, about 70% of the irrigated cropland uses center pivots that may negatively impact specialty crop quality. Thus, a 3-year experiment was conducted to assess the potential of using mobile drip irrigation (MDI) to produce fresh watermelon compared to center pivot sprinkler irrigation using low-elevation spray application (LESA), and surface drip irrigation with plastic mulch (DI). The study evaluated the effects of irrigation systems on crop yield, fruit quality, physiological responses, water use efficiency (WUE), and irrigation use efficiency (IUE). On average, plants under MDI had higher yields (106 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) than those under DI (70 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and LESA (68 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>). Plants under MDI and DI also had more fruits per plant (1.9) than those under LESA (1.4). The higher yield was associated with higher biomass and photosynthetic function. In general, fruit quality was not affected by irrigation system. In addition, plants under MDI system showed a higher WUE and IUE, and less water stress than those under LESA and DI systems. Results of this study suggest that irrigating under an MDI system is a good alternative for growers in the Texas High Plains that aim to diversify their cropping system with high-value vegetable crops such as watermelon (<i>Citrullus lanatus</i>).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"116 5\",\"pages\":\"2535-2550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21653\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21653\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

得克萨斯州高原地区约有 90% 的地区依靠奥加拉拉含水层供水。由于传统的灌溉田作物需水量大,奥加拉拉地下水位的下降引起了人们对其生产可持续性的担忧。因此,耕作制度多样化可能是一个解决办法。然而,约 70% 的灌溉耕地使用中心枢轴,这可能会对特种作物的质量产生负面影响。因此,进行了一项为期 3 年的试验,以评估使用移动滴灌(MDI)生产新鲜西瓜的潜力,与使用低海拔喷洒(LESA)的中心枢纽喷灌和使用塑料地膜的地表滴灌(DI)进行比较。该研究评估了灌溉系统对作物产量、果实品质、生理反应、水分利用效率(WUE)和灌溉利用效率(IUE)的影响。平均而言,使用 MDI 的植株产量(106 兆克/公顷-1)高于使用 DI(70 兆克/公顷-1)和 LESA(68 兆克/公顷-1)的植株。种植 MDI 和 DI 的植株每株结果数(1.9 个)也高于种植 LESA 的植株每株结果数(1.4 个)。较高的产量与较高的生物量和光合功能有关。总体而言,果实质量不受灌溉系统的影响。此外,与 LESA 和 DI 系统相比,MDI 系统下的植株表现出更高的 WUE 和 IUE,以及更低的水分胁迫。这项研究的结果表明,对于德克萨斯高原地区的种植者来说,在 MDI 系统下灌溉西瓜(Citrullus lanatus)等高价值蔬菜作物是实现种植系统多样化的一个不错选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of three irrigation application systems for watermelon production in the Texas High Plains

Evaluation of three irrigation application systems for watermelon production in the Texas High Plains

About 90% of the Texas High Plains area depends on the water supply from the Ogallala aquifer. The decline of the Ogallala water table raises a concern for the sustainability of producing the traditional irrigated field crops due to their high water demand. Thus, diversifying cropping systems may be a solution. However, about 70% of the irrigated cropland uses center pivots that may negatively impact specialty crop quality. Thus, a 3-year experiment was conducted to assess the potential of using mobile drip irrigation (MDI) to produce fresh watermelon compared to center pivot sprinkler irrigation using low-elevation spray application (LESA), and surface drip irrigation with plastic mulch (DI). The study evaluated the effects of irrigation systems on crop yield, fruit quality, physiological responses, water use efficiency (WUE), and irrigation use efficiency (IUE). On average, plants under MDI had higher yields (106 Mg ha−1) than those under DI (70 Mg ha−1) and LESA (68 Mg ha−1). Plants under MDI and DI also had more fruits per plant (1.9) than those under LESA (1.4). The higher yield was associated with higher biomass and photosynthetic function. In general, fruit quality was not affected by irrigation system. In addition, plants under MDI system showed a higher WUE and IUE, and less water stress than those under LESA and DI systems. Results of this study suggest that irrigating under an MDI system is a good alternative for growers in the Texas High Plains that aim to diversify their cropping system with high-value vegetable crops such as watermelon (Citrullus lanatus).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信