具有计算密集型或棘手似然的空间过程的神经似然曲面

IF 2.1 2区 数学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Julia Walchessen , Amanda Lenzi , Mikael Kuusela
{"title":"具有计算密集型或棘手似然的空间过程的神经似然曲面","authors":"Julia Walchessen ,&nbsp;Amanda Lenzi ,&nbsp;Mikael Kuusela","doi":"10.1016/j.spasta.2024.100848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In spatial statistics, fast and accurate parameter estimation, coupled with a reliable means of uncertainty quantification, can be challenging when fitting a spatial process to real-world data because the likelihood function might be slow to evaluate or wholly intractable. In this work, we propose using convolutional neural networks to learn the likelihood function of a spatial process. Through a specifically designed classification task, our neural network implicitly learns the likelihood function, even in situations where the exact likelihood is not explicitly available. Once trained on the classification task, our neural network is calibrated using Platt scaling which improves the accuracy of the neural likelihood surfaces. To demonstrate our approach, we compare neural likelihood surfaces and the resulting maximum likelihood estimates and approximate confidence regions with the equivalent for exact or approximate likelihood for two different spatial processes—a Gaussian process and a Brown–Resnick process which have computationally intensive and intractable likelihoods, respectively. We conclude that our method provides fast and accurate parameter estimation with a reliable method of uncertainty quantification in situations where standard methods are either undesirably slow or inaccurate. The method is applicable to any spatial process on a grid from which fast simulations are available.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48771,"journal":{"name":"Spatial Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211675324000393/pdfft?md5=23fbff43d8f95a95bb05cdb8ddb6dab6&pid=1-s2.0-S2211675324000393-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural likelihood surfaces for spatial processes with computationally intensive or intractable likelihoods\",\"authors\":\"Julia Walchessen ,&nbsp;Amanda Lenzi ,&nbsp;Mikael Kuusela\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spasta.2024.100848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In spatial statistics, fast and accurate parameter estimation, coupled with a reliable means of uncertainty quantification, can be challenging when fitting a spatial process to real-world data because the likelihood function might be slow to evaluate or wholly intractable. In this work, we propose using convolutional neural networks to learn the likelihood function of a spatial process. Through a specifically designed classification task, our neural network implicitly learns the likelihood function, even in situations where the exact likelihood is not explicitly available. Once trained on the classification task, our neural network is calibrated using Platt scaling which improves the accuracy of the neural likelihood surfaces. To demonstrate our approach, we compare neural likelihood surfaces and the resulting maximum likelihood estimates and approximate confidence regions with the equivalent for exact or approximate likelihood for two different spatial processes—a Gaussian process and a Brown–Resnick process which have computationally intensive and intractable likelihoods, respectively. We conclude that our method provides fast and accurate parameter estimation with a reliable method of uncertainty quantification in situations where standard methods are either undesirably slow or inaccurate. The method is applicable to any spatial process on a grid from which fast simulations are available.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spatial Statistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211675324000393/pdfft?md5=23fbff43d8f95a95bb05cdb8ddb6dab6&pid=1-s2.0-S2211675324000393-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spatial Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211675324000393\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatial Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211675324000393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在空间统计学中,将空间过程拟合到现实世界的数据时,快速准确的参数估计加上可靠的不确定性量化方法可能会面临挑战,因为似然函数的评估可能会很慢,或者完全难以解决。在这项工作中,我们建议使用卷积神经网络来学习空间过程的似然函数。通过专门设计的分类任务,我们的神经网络可以隐式学习似然函数,即使在无法明确获得确切似然的情况下也是如此。在对分类任务进行训练后,我们的神经网络将使用普拉特缩放进行校准,从而提高神经似然曲面的准确性。为了证明我们的方法,我们比较了神经似然曲面和由此产生的最大似然估计值和近似置信区域,以及两种不同空间过程的精确或近似似然的等效值--高斯过程和布朗-雷斯尼克过程,这两种过程分别具有计算密集型似然和难以处理的似然。我们的结论是,我们的方法提供了快速、准确的参数估计,在标准方法过于缓慢或不准确的情况下,提供了可靠的不确定性量化方法。该方法适用于网格上的任何空间过程,并可对其进行快速模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neural likelihood surfaces for spatial processes with computationally intensive or intractable likelihoods

In spatial statistics, fast and accurate parameter estimation, coupled with a reliable means of uncertainty quantification, can be challenging when fitting a spatial process to real-world data because the likelihood function might be slow to evaluate or wholly intractable. In this work, we propose using convolutional neural networks to learn the likelihood function of a spatial process. Through a specifically designed classification task, our neural network implicitly learns the likelihood function, even in situations where the exact likelihood is not explicitly available. Once trained on the classification task, our neural network is calibrated using Platt scaling which improves the accuracy of the neural likelihood surfaces. To demonstrate our approach, we compare neural likelihood surfaces and the resulting maximum likelihood estimates and approximate confidence regions with the equivalent for exact or approximate likelihood for two different spatial processes—a Gaussian process and a Brown–Resnick process which have computationally intensive and intractable likelihoods, respectively. We conclude that our method provides fast and accurate parameter estimation with a reliable method of uncertainty quantification in situations where standard methods are either undesirably slow or inaccurate. The method is applicable to any spatial process on a grid from which fast simulations are available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spatial Statistics
Spatial Statistics GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
21.70%
发文量
89
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Spatial Statistics publishes articles on the theory and application of spatial and spatio-temporal statistics. It favours manuscripts that present theory generated by new applications, or in which new theory is applied to an important practical case. A purely theoretical study will only rarely be accepted. Pure case studies without methodological development are not acceptable for publication. Spatial statistics concerns the quantitative analysis of spatial and spatio-temporal data, including their statistical dependencies, accuracy and uncertainties. Methodology for spatial statistics is typically found in probability theory, stochastic modelling and mathematical statistics as well as in information science. Spatial statistics is used in mapping, assessing spatial data quality, sampling design optimisation, modelling of dependence structures, and drawing of valid inference from a limited set of spatio-temporal data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信