Marco Jordanio Pereira Feitosa Lima , Suzete Chiviacowsky , Ricardo Drews , Priscila Cardozo
{"title":"社会经济地位刻板印象影响运动学习","authors":"Marco Jordanio Pereira Feitosa Lima , Suzete Chiviacowsky , Ricardo Drews , Priscila Cardozo","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research evidence suggests that different populations may have impaired motor performance and learning due to practice conditions with negative gender, weight, and age stereotypes. The effects of socioeconomic stereotypes on motor learning, however, are still unknown. The present study investigated the effects of the low socioeconomic status stereotype on learning a motor skill. Participants, low-income young adults of both sexes (mean age 26.6 ± 4.63 years), were randomized into two groups: stereotype threat (ST) and nullified stereotype threat (NST). Before practicing a spatiotemporal accuracy skill on the computer, participants were told that people with middle and high income generally perform better on the task than people with low income (ST), or that performance on the task is not influenced by individual differences (NST). Learning, or relatively permanent effects on performance, was measured one day after practice via a retention test. The results revealed similar performance of the groups during the practice phase (<em>p</em> = .065). However, the stereotype threat group performed significantly worse on the task than the nullified stereotype threat group on the retention test (<em>p</em> = .039). These findings provide the first evidence that socioeconomic stereotypes can affect motor learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 102026"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic status stereotype affects motor learning\",\"authors\":\"Marco Jordanio Pereira Feitosa Lima , Suzete Chiviacowsky , Ricardo Drews , Priscila Cardozo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Research evidence suggests that different populations may have impaired motor performance and learning due to practice conditions with negative gender, weight, and age stereotypes. The effects of socioeconomic stereotypes on motor learning, however, are still unknown. The present study investigated the effects of the low socioeconomic status stereotype on learning a motor skill. Participants, low-income young adults of both sexes (mean age 26.6 ± 4.63 years), were randomized into two groups: stereotype threat (ST) and nullified stereotype threat (NST). Before practicing a spatiotemporal accuracy skill on the computer, participants were told that people with middle and high income generally perform better on the task than people with low income (ST), or that performance on the task is not influenced by individual differences (NST). Learning, or relatively permanent effects on performance, was measured one day after practice via a retention test. The results revealed similar performance of the groups during the practice phase (<em>p</em> = .065). However, the stereotype threat group performed significantly worse on the task than the nullified stereotype threat group on the retention test (<em>p</em> = .039). These findings provide the first evidence that socioeconomic stereotypes can affect motor learning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000687\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Socioeconomic status stereotype affects motor learning
Research evidence suggests that different populations may have impaired motor performance and learning due to practice conditions with negative gender, weight, and age stereotypes. The effects of socioeconomic stereotypes on motor learning, however, are still unknown. The present study investigated the effects of the low socioeconomic status stereotype on learning a motor skill. Participants, low-income young adults of both sexes (mean age 26.6 ± 4.63 years), were randomized into two groups: stereotype threat (ST) and nullified stereotype threat (NST). Before practicing a spatiotemporal accuracy skill on the computer, participants were told that people with middle and high income generally perform better on the task than people with low income (ST), or that performance on the task is not influenced by individual differences (NST). Learning, or relatively permanent effects on performance, was measured one day after practice via a retention test. The results revealed similar performance of the groups during the practice phase (p = .065). However, the stereotype threat group performed significantly worse on the task than the nullified stereotype threat group on the retention test (p = .039). These findings provide the first evidence that socioeconomic stereotypes can affect motor learning.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.