Danilo Giffoni de Mello Morais Mata, Mary-Beth Rush, Megan Smith-Uffen, Jawaid Younus, Ana Elisa Lohmann, Maureen Trudeau, Rebecca L. Morgan
{"title":"早期 HER2 阴性乳腺癌患者不接受蒽环类化疗--系统综述与元分析","authors":"Danilo Giffoni de Mello Morais Mata, Mary-Beth Rush, Megan Smith-Uffen, Jawaid Younus, Ana Elisa Lohmann, Maureen Trudeau, Rebecca L. Morgan","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31080335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anthracycline-taxane is the standard chemotherapy strategy for treating high-risk early breast cancer despite the potentially life-threatening adverse events caused by anthracyclines. Commonly, the combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) is considered an alternative option. However, the efficacy of TC compared to anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy is unclear. This study compares disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cardiotoxicity between adjuvant TC and anthracycline-taxane for stages I–III, HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods: A systematic search on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized-controlled trials published until 11 March 2024, yielded 203 studies with 11,803 patients, and seven trials were included. Results: TC results in little to no difference in DFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98–1.20; moderate-certainty of evidence); OS (1.02, 95% CI 0.89–1.16; high-certainty of evidence); and cardiotoxicity (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.16–1.76; high-certainty of evidence), compared to anthracycline-taxane. In the subgroup analysis, patients with ≥4 lymph nodes had improved DFS from anthracycline-taxane over TC. Conclusions: Overall, there was no difference between TC and anthracycline-taxane in DFS, OS and cardiotoxicity. In women with ≥4 nodes, anthracycline-taxane was associated with a substantial reduction in relapse events, compared to TC. Our study supports the current standard of practice, which is to use anthracycline-taxane and TC chemotherapy as a reasonable option in select cases.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Omission of Anthracycline Chemotherapy in Women with Early HER2-Negative Breast Cancer—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Danilo Giffoni de Mello Morais Mata, Mary-Beth Rush, Megan Smith-Uffen, Jawaid Younus, Ana Elisa Lohmann, Maureen Trudeau, Rebecca L. Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31080335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Anthracycline-taxane is the standard chemotherapy strategy for treating high-risk early breast cancer despite the potentially life-threatening adverse events caused by anthracyclines. Commonly, the combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) is considered an alternative option. However, the efficacy of TC compared to anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy is unclear. This study compares disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cardiotoxicity between adjuvant TC and anthracycline-taxane for stages I–III, HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods: A systematic search on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized-controlled trials published until 11 March 2024, yielded 203 studies with 11,803 patients, and seven trials were included. Results: TC results in little to no difference in DFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98–1.20; moderate-certainty of evidence); OS (1.02, 95% CI 0.89–1.16; high-certainty of evidence); and cardiotoxicity (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.16–1.76; high-certainty of evidence), compared to anthracycline-taxane. In the subgroup analysis, patients with ≥4 lymph nodes had improved DFS from anthracycline-taxane over TC. Conclusions: Overall, there was no difference between TC and anthracycline-taxane in DFS, OS and cardiotoxicity. In women with ≥4 nodes, anthracycline-taxane was associated with a substantial reduction in relapse events, compared to TC. Our study supports the current standard of practice, which is to use anthracycline-taxane and TC chemotherapy as a reasonable option in select cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管蒽环类药物可能会导致危及生命的不良反应,但蒽环类-他赛类药物是治疗高危早期乳腺癌的标准化疗策略。多西他赛和环磷酰胺(TC)联合疗法通常被认为是一种替代选择。然而,与蒽环类-他烷类化疗相比,多西他赛联合环磷酰胺化疗的疗效尚不明确。本研究比较了 I-III 期 HER2 阴性乳腺癌辅助 TC 和蒽环类-他烷化疗的无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)和心脏毒性。研究方法在MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL上系统检索了截至2024年3月11日发表的随机对照试验,共获得203项研究,11803名患者,其中纳入了7项试验。研究结果与蒽环类-他卡西酮相比,TC在DFS(HR 1.09,95% CI 0.98-1.20;中度证据确定性)、OS(1.02,95% CI 0.89-1.16;高度证据确定性)和心脏毒性(RR 0.54,95% CI 0.16-1.76;高度证据确定性)方面几乎没有差异。在亚组分析中,淋巴结≥4个的患者使用蒽环类紫杉烷比使用TC的DFS有所改善。结论总体而言,在DFS、OS和心脏毒性方面,TC和蒽环类紫杉烷没有差异。对于≥4个结节的女性患者,蒽环类紫杉烷与TC相比可显著减少复发事件。我们的研究支持目前的实践标准,即在特定病例中使用蒽环类紫杉烷和TC化疗作为合理的选择。
The Omission of Anthracycline Chemotherapy in Women with Early HER2-Negative Breast Cancer—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Anthracycline-taxane is the standard chemotherapy strategy for treating high-risk early breast cancer despite the potentially life-threatening adverse events caused by anthracyclines. Commonly, the combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) is considered an alternative option. However, the efficacy of TC compared to anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy is unclear. This study compares disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cardiotoxicity between adjuvant TC and anthracycline-taxane for stages I–III, HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods: A systematic search on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized-controlled trials published until 11 March 2024, yielded 203 studies with 11,803 patients, and seven trials were included. Results: TC results in little to no difference in DFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98–1.20; moderate-certainty of evidence); OS (1.02, 95% CI 0.89–1.16; high-certainty of evidence); and cardiotoxicity (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.16–1.76; high-certainty of evidence), compared to anthracycline-taxane. In the subgroup analysis, patients with ≥4 lymph nodes had improved DFS from anthracycline-taxane over TC. Conclusions: Overall, there was no difference between TC and anthracycline-taxane in DFS, OS and cardiotoxicity. In women with ≥4 nodes, anthracycline-taxane was associated with a substantial reduction in relapse events, compared to TC. Our study supports the current standard of practice, which is to use anthracycline-taxane and TC chemotherapy as a reasonable option in select cases.