单灶、同步和近交非小细胞肺癌的重复下一代测序(15 个基因组)--单中心经验

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Shelley Kuang, Kaitlin Chen, Sachin Sayal, Gajeni Prabahan, Mary R. Rabey, Lisa W. Le, Andrew Seto, Frances A. Shepherd, Geoffrey Liu, Penelope Bradbury, Adrian G. Sacher, Jennifer H. Law, Peter Sabatini, Tracy L. Stockley, Ming S. Tsao, Natasha B. Leighl
{"title":"单灶、同步和近交非小细胞肺癌的重复下一代测序(15 个基因组)--单中心经验","authors":"Shelley Kuang, Kaitlin Chen, Sachin Sayal, Gajeni Prabahan, Mary R. Rabey, Lisa W. Le, Andrew Seto, Frances A. Shepherd, Geoffrey Liu, Penelope Bradbury, Adrian G. Sacher, Jennifer H. Law, Peter Sabatini, Tracy L. Stockley, Ming S. Tsao, Natasha B. Leighl","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31080334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), routine testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) is recommended to identify actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). The therapeutic implications of repeated NGS testing on synchronous and metachronous tumors are unclear. Between February 2017 and October 2020, NSCLC samples from a single institution were reflex-tested using a targeted 15-gene NGS panel (TruSight Tumor 15, Illumina). Thirty-eight patients were identified with multiple NGS results from 82 samples: 11% were from single unifocal, 51% were from synchronous, and 38% were from metachronous tumors. Changes in EGFR, KRAS, PI3KCA, and TP53 variants were found in 22 patients’ samples (58%). No changes were seen with longitudinal testing of multiple samples from single unifocal tumors, while changes were observed in 60% of synchronous and 71% of metachronous tumors. Of these, 26% of patients had AGA differences between samples. Acknowledging the limited sample size, a significant difference in overall survival was observed between synchronous separate primaries and metastasis. Repeat NGS testing of synchronous and metachronous NSCLC tumors may identify differing variants in >50% of patients. These changes may reflect separate primary lung carcinomas, tumor heterogeneity among intrapulmonary metastases, and clonal evolution. NGS testing of multiple tumors may enhance the identification of therapeutic targets for treatment decisions.","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeat Next-Generation Sequencing (15-Gene Panel) in Unifocal, Synchronous, and Metachronous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer—A Single-Center Experience\",\"authors\":\"Shelley Kuang, Kaitlin Chen, Sachin Sayal, Gajeni Prabahan, Mary R. Rabey, Lisa W. Le, Andrew Seto, Frances A. Shepherd, Geoffrey Liu, Penelope Bradbury, Adrian G. Sacher, Jennifer H. Law, Peter Sabatini, Tracy L. Stockley, Ming S. Tsao, Natasha B. Leighl\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31080334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), routine testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) is recommended to identify actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). The therapeutic implications of repeated NGS testing on synchronous and metachronous tumors are unclear. Between February 2017 and October 2020, NSCLC samples from a single institution were reflex-tested using a targeted 15-gene NGS panel (TruSight Tumor 15, Illumina). Thirty-eight patients were identified with multiple NGS results from 82 samples: 11% were from single unifocal, 51% were from synchronous, and 38% were from metachronous tumors. Changes in EGFR, KRAS, PI3KCA, and TP53 variants were found in 22 patients’ samples (58%). No changes were seen with longitudinal testing of multiple samples from single unifocal tumors, while changes were observed in 60% of synchronous and 71% of metachronous tumors. Of these, 26% of patients had AGA differences between samples. Acknowledging the limited sample size, a significant difference in overall survival was observed between synchronous separate primaries and metastasis. Repeat NGS testing of synchronous and metachronous NSCLC tumors may identify differing variants in >50% of patients. These changes may reflect separate primary lung carcinomas, tumor heterogeneity among intrapulmonary metastases, and clonal evolution. NGS testing of multiple tumors may enhance the identification of therapeutic targets for treatment decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080334\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),建议使用新一代测序(NGS)进行常规检测,以确定可操作的基因组改变(AGAs)。目前尚不清楚对同步和不同步肿瘤进行重复 NGS 检测的治疗意义。2017 年 2 月至 2020 年 10 月期间,使用靶向 15 基因 NGS 面板(TruSight Tumor 15,Illumina)对来自单一机构的 NSCLC 样本进行了反射检测。从 82 份样本中确定了 38 名有多个 NGS 结果的患者:11%来自单发肿瘤,51%来自同步肿瘤,38%来自间变性肿瘤。在 22 例患者样本(58%)中发现了表皮生长因子受体、KRAS、PI3KCA 和 TP53 变体的变化。对来自单发肿瘤的多个样本进行纵向检测未发现变化,而在60%的同步肿瘤和71%的间变性肿瘤中观察到了变化。其中,26%的患者样本间存在 AGA 差异。尽管样本量有限,但在同步独立原发肿瘤和转移瘤之间观察到了总生存率的显著差异。对同步和近同步 NSCLC 肿瘤进行重复 NGS 检测可能会在 50% 以上的患者中发现不同的变异。这些变化可能反映了不同的原发性肺癌、肺内转移瘤之间的肿瘤异质性以及克隆进化。对多个肿瘤进行 NGS 检测可提高对治疗靶点的识别能力,以便做出治疗决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeat Next-Generation Sequencing (15-Gene Panel) in Unifocal, Synchronous, and Metachronous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer—A Single-Center Experience
In advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), routine testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) is recommended to identify actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). The therapeutic implications of repeated NGS testing on synchronous and metachronous tumors are unclear. Between February 2017 and October 2020, NSCLC samples from a single institution were reflex-tested using a targeted 15-gene NGS panel (TruSight Tumor 15, Illumina). Thirty-eight patients were identified with multiple NGS results from 82 samples: 11% were from single unifocal, 51% were from synchronous, and 38% were from metachronous tumors. Changes in EGFR, KRAS, PI3KCA, and TP53 variants were found in 22 patients’ samples (58%). No changes were seen with longitudinal testing of multiple samples from single unifocal tumors, while changes were observed in 60% of synchronous and 71% of metachronous tumors. Of these, 26% of patients had AGA differences between samples. Acknowledging the limited sample size, a significant difference in overall survival was observed between synchronous separate primaries and metastasis. Repeat NGS testing of synchronous and metachronous NSCLC tumors may identify differing variants in >50% of patients. These changes may reflect separate primary lung carcinomas, tumor heterogeneity among intrapulmonary metastases, and clonal evolution. NGS testing of multiple tumors may enhance the identification of therapeutic targets for treatment decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信