城市径流渗透生物滞留设计策略比较分析:重要概述

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Maria Thereza Rocha Chaves, Teresa Raquel Lima Farias, Waleska Martins Eloi
{"title":"城市径流渗透生物滞留设计策略比较分析:重要概述","authors":"Maria Thereza Rocha Chaves,&nbsp;Teresa Raquel Lima Farias,&nbsp;Waleska Martins Eloi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic review article provides a comprehensive overview of the application of nature-based solutions, specifically rain gardens, as compensatory techniques for stormwater management in various locations worldwide. A total of 53 articles, published between 2008 and 2024, were selected to identify the most utilized and advanced approaches regarding the quantitative analysis of bioretention cells for stormwater storage and infiltration. Given that this is a relatively recent topic in the context of urban drainage, with over 65% of the research published in the last five years (2020–2024), an established consensus on best construction practices, ideal materials, and suitable vegetation selection has yet to be reached. The studies are predominantly focused on temperate regions, indicating a pressing need for future investigations, particularly in tropical regions where data availability is limited. The reviewed studies highlight that the performance of rain gardens is intrinsically linked to a variety of parameters, including the confluence ratio, rainfall regime, engineering soil media composition, infiltration rate, internal layer configuration, and vegetation selection. However, despite the lack of consensus on these aspects, the analyses indicate that the implementation of rain gardens can effectively contribute to stormwater retention in urban environments. This finding suggests that, although there are gaps in the detailed understanding of the mechanisms and optimal conditions for maximum performance, there is a solid foundation for the continued use and enhancement of this practice as an effective stormwater management strategy in urban areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 107352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of bioretention design strategies for urban runoff infiltration: a critical overview\",\"authors\":\"Maria Thereza Rocha Chaves,&nbsp;Teresa Raquel Lima Farias,&nbsp;Waleska Martins Eloi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This systematic review article provides a comprehensive overview of the application of nature-based solutions, specifically rain gardens, as compensatory techniques for stormwater management in various locations worldwide. A total of 53 articles, published between 2008 and 2024, were selected to identify the most utilized and advanced approaches regarding the quantitative analysis of bioretention cells for stormwater storage and infiltration. Given that this is a relatively recent topic in the context of urban drainage, with over 65% of the research published in the last five years (2020–2024), an established consensus on best construction practices, ideal materials, and suitable vegetation selection has yet to be reached. The studies are predominantly focused on temperate regions, indicating a pressing need for future investigations, particularly in tropical regions where data availability is limited. The reviewed studies highlight that the performance of rain gardens is intrinsically linked to a variety of parameters, including the confluence ratio, rainfall regime, engineering soil media composition, infiltration rate, internal layer configuration, and vegetation selection. However, despite the lack of consensus on these aspects, the analyses indicate that the implementation of rain gardens can effectively contribute to stormwater retention in urban environments. This finding suggests that, although there are gaps in the detailed understanding of the mechanisms and optimal conditions for maximum performance, there is a solid foundation for the continued use and enhancement of this practice as an effective stormwater management strategy in urban areas.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"207 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001770\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇系统性综述文章全面概述了基于自然的解决方案(特别是雨水花园)作为雨水管理补偿技术在世界各地的应用情况。文章共选取了 2008 年至 2024 年间发表的 53 篇文章,以确定对用于雨水储存和渗透的生物蓄水池进行定量分析的最常用和最先进的方法。鉴于这是城市排水领域中一个相对较新的课题,超过 65% 的研究发表于最近五年(2020-2024 年),因此尚未就最佳施工方法、理想材料和合适的植被选择达成共识。这些研究主要集中在温带地区,表明未来迫切需要开展调查,特别是在数据可用性有限的热带地区。所审查的研究强调,雨水花园的性能与各种参数有内在联系,包括汇流比、降雨机制、工程土壤介质成分、渗透率、内层构造和植被选择。然而,尽管在这些方面缺乏共识,但分析表明,雨水花园的实施可有效促进城市环境中的雨水滞留。这一研究结果表明,尽管在详细了解雨水花园的作用机理和实现最大性能的最佳条件方面还存在差距,但作为一种有效的雨水管理策略,雨水花园在城市地区的持续使用和发展已经有了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative analysis of bioretention design strategies for urban runoff infiltration: a critical overview

Comparative analysis of bioretention design strategies for urban runoff infiltration: a critical overview

This systematic review article provides a comprehensive overview of the application of nature-based solutions, specifically rain gardens, as compensatory techniques for stormwater management in various locations worldwide. A total of 53 articles, published between 2008 and 2024, were selected to identify the most utilized and advanced approaches regarding the quantitative analysis of bioretention cells for stormwater storage and infiltration. Given that this is a relatively recent topic in the context of urban drainage, with over 65% of the research published in the last five years (2020–2024), an established consensus on best construction practices, ideal materials, and suitable vegetation selection has yet to be reached. The studies are predominantly focused on temperate regions, indicating a pressing need for future investigations, particularly in tropical regions where data availability is limited. The reviewed studies highlight that the performance of rain gardens is intrinsically linked to a variety of parameters, including the confluence ratio, rainfall regime, engineering soil media composition, infiltration rate, internal layer configuration, and vegetation selection. However, despite the lack of consensus on these aspects, the analyses indicate that the implementation of rain gardens can effectively contribute to stormwater retention in urban environments. This finding suggests that, although there are gaps in the detailed understanding of the mechanisms and optimal conditions for maximum performance, there is a solid foundation for the continued use and enhancement of this practice as an effective stormwater management strategy in urban areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信