堆栈反转:论算法中心主义与金融证券自动交易系统的复杂架构

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Kristian Bondo Hansen
{"title":"堆栈反转:论算法中心主义与金融证券自动交易系统的复杂架构","authors":"Kristian Bondo Hansen","doi":"10.1177/01622439241269983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I argue that devoting analytical attention to the natively technical concept of “the stack” can help re-sensitize studies of algorithms in Science and Technology Studies (STS) and adjacent fields to the depths of interdependence between different layers and elements of computational systems. Inspired by Bowker and Star's three-decades old methodological gestalt-switch concept of “infrastructural inversion,” I propose a “stack inversion” that seeks to mitigate “algo-centrism”—an overemphasis on algorithms and algorithmic action—by shifting focus to the relational practices and material politics of “stacking.” To demonstrate the analytical value of this stack inversion, I examine and discuss how software developers, data scientists, computer engineers, and other so-called “quants” working in the financial industry talk about and reflect on their own practices of devising and operating automated trading systems. The empirical material I analyze consists of 182 interviews conducted in the US and Europe with people occupying a range of different roles in financial securities trading and investment management. The article contributes to the burgeoning STS-informed literature on algorithms by proposing a conceptual-analytic move that allows for reflexive engagement with the material politics, opacities, and dependencies created in and around automated computational systems.","PeriodicalId":48083,"journal":{"name":"Science Technology & Human Values","volume":"303 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Stack Inversion: On Algo-Centrism and the Complex Architecture of Automated Financial Securities Trading Systems\",\"authors\":\"Kristian Bondo Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01622439241269983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I argue that devoting analytical attention to the natively technical concept of “the stack” can help re-sensitize studies of algorithms in Science and Technology Studies (STS) and adjacent fields to the depths of interdependence between different layers and elements of computational systems. Inspired by Bowker and Star's three-decades old methodological gestalt-switch concept of “infrastructural inversion,” I propose a “stack inversion” that seeks to mitigate “algo-centrism”—an overemphasis on algorithms and algorithmic action—by shifting focus to the relational practices and material politics of “stacking.” To demonstrate the analytical value of this stack inversion, I examine and discuss how software developers, data scientists, computer engineers, and other so-called “quants” working in the financial industry talk about and reflect on their own practices of devising and operating automated trading systems. The empirical material I analyze consists of 182 interviews conducted in the US and Europe with people occupying a range of different roles in financial securities trading and investment management. The article contributes to the burgeoning STS-informed literature on algorithms by proposing a conceptual-analytic move that allows for reflexive engagement with the material politics, opacities, and dependencies created in and around automated computational systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Technology & Human Values\",\"volume\":\"303 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Technology & Human Values\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439241269983\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Technology & Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439241269983","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我认为对 "堆栈 "这一固有的技术概念投入分析性关注,有助于科学与技术研究(STS)和相邻领域的算法研究重新关注计算系统不同层次和元素之间相互依存的深度。受鲍克和斯塔尔三十年前提出的 "基础设施反转 "这一方法论格式塔转换概念的启发,我提出了一种 "堆栈反转",旨在通过将焦点转向 "堆栈 "的关系实践和物质政治,来缓解 "算法中心主义"--对算法和算法行动的过度强调。为了证明这种堆栈反转的分析价值,我研究并讨论了在金融业工作的软件开发人员、数据科学家、计算机工程师和其他所谓的 "经济人 "如何谈论和反思他们自己设计和操作自动交易系统的实践。我分析的实证材料包括在美国和欧洲进行的 182 次访谈,访谈对象是在金融证券交易和投资管理领域担任各种不同职务的人员。这篇文章提出了一种概念分析方法,允许反思性地参与自动计算系统及其周围所产生的物质政治、不透明和依赖性,从而为正在蓬勃发展的以 STS 为基础的算法文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Stack Inversion: On Algo-Centrism and the Complex Architecture of Automated Financial Securities Trading Systems
In this article, I argue that devoting analytical attention to the natively technical concept of “the stack” can help re-sensitize studies of algorithms in Science and Technology Studies (STS) and adjacent fields to the depths of interdependence between different layers and elements of computational systems. Inspired by Bowker and Star's three-decades old methodological gestalt-switch concept of “infrastructural inversion,” I propose a “stack inversion” that seeks to mitigate “algo-centrism”—an overemphasis on algorithms and algorithmic action—by shifting focus to the relational practices and material politics of “stacking.” To demonstrate the analytical value of this stack inversion, I examine and discuss how software developers, data scientists, computer engineers, and other so-called “quants” working in the financial industry talk about and reflect on their own practices of devising and operating automated trading systems. The empirical material I analyze consists of 182 interviews conducted in the US and Europe with people occupying a range of different roles in financial securities trading and investment management. The article contributes to the burgeoning STS-informed literature on algorithms by proposing a conceptual-analytic move that allows for reflexive engagement with the material politics, opacities, and dependencies created in and around automated computational systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: As scientific advances improve our lives, they also complicate how we live and react to the new technologies. More and more, human values come into conflict with scientific advancement as we deal with important issues such as nuclear power, environmental degradation and information technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values is a peer-reviewed, international, interdisciplinary journal containing research, analyses and commentary on the development and dynamics of science and technology, including their relationship to politics, society and culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信