{"title":"词汇密度和任务类型对中国学生附带词汇习得的影响","authors":"Zibei Ye","doi":"10.54475/jlt.2024.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the effects arose by different lexical densities (2%, 5%) and task types (mind map, continuation task) on Chinese senior high students. Four classes of intermediate-level Chinese EFL learners were randomly assigned to four groups, where the treatment condition for each group includes two variables (group1: 2%+mind map, group2: 5%+mind map, group3: 5%+continuation task, group4: 2%+continuation task). It was found that (1) lexical density (2%, 5%) would not result in a significant difference on incidental vocabulary acquisition; (2) Both tasks would lead to a significant difference on incidental vocabulary acquisition and (3) mind map showed superiority in enhancing receptive vocabulary, productive vocabulary and word retention under the text of 5% of lexical density; (4) 2% of lexical density more facilitated output vocabulary when the continuation task was administered. Pedagogical implications of these results for EFL vocabulary acquisition are discussed.","PeriodicalId":512131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Teaching","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of lexical densities and task types on Chinese students’ incidental vocabulary acquisition\",\"authors\":\"Zibei Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.54475/jlt.2024.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the effects arose by different lexical densities (2%, 5%) and task types (mind map, continuation task) on Chinese senior high students. Four classes of intermediate-level Chinese EFL learners were randomly assigned to four groups, where the treatment condition for each group includes two variables (group1: 2%+mind map, group2: 5%+mind map, group3: 5%+continuation task, group4: 2%+continuation task). It was found that (1) lexical density (2%, 5%) would not result in a significant difference on incidental vocabulary acquisition; (2) Both tasks would lead to a significant difference on incidental vocabulary acquisition and (3) mind map showed superiority in enhancing receptive vocabulary, productive vocabulary and word retention under the text of 5% of lexical density; (4) 2% of lexical density more facilitated output vocabulary when the continuation task was administered. Pedagogical implications of these results for EFL vocabulary acquisition are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":512131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language Teaching\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2024.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2024.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effects of lexical densities and task types on Chinese students’ incidental vocabulary acquisition
This study examines the effects arose by different lexical densities (2%, 5%) and task types (mind map, continuation task) on Chinese senior high students. Four classes of intermediate-level Chinese EFL learners were randomly assigned to four groups, where the treatment condition for each group includes two variables (group1: 2%+mind map, group2: 5%+mind map, group3: 5%+continuation task, group4: 2%+continuation task). It was found that (1) lexical density (2%, 5%) would not result in a significant difference on incidental vocabulary acquisition; (2) Both tasks would lead to a significant difference on incidental vocabulary acquisition and (3) mind map showed superiority in enhancing receptive vocabulary, productive vocabulary and word retention under the text of 5% of lexical density; (4) 2% of lexical density more facilitated output vocabulary when the continuation task was administered. Pedagogical implications of these results for EFL vocabulary acquisition are discussed.