{"title":"探索中国 EFL 教师对评估实践中的创造性和批判性的看法:定性研究","authors":"Wenli Xu, Li Sheng","doi":"10.1111/ijal.12599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various studies have highlighted the significant role of creativity and criticality in English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts. Yet, their contribution to and mechanism in assessment domains are widely neglected. To address this shortcoming in the literature, the present study took advantage of a qualitative design via a semi‐structured interview with a sample of 29 Chinese EFL teachers to unravel their perceptions of creativity and criticality in second language (L2) assessment practices. The interview results pinpointed that Chinese EFL teachers regarded both creativity and criticality as valuable skills, which can be nurtured via various assessment practices in the class. Specifically, the participants maintained that creativity could be measured and improved by using “multimedia and technologies,” “games and scenarios,” “mind maps,” and “authentic assessment.” Likewise, criticality can be developed in learners through “debates and discussions,” “role play,” “written tests like argumentative essays,” and “oral interviews.” The findings are discussed about prior research and implications are suggested to EFL teachers, teacher educators, and curriculum designers to increase their understanding and implementation of assessment practices oriented to creativity and criticality.","PeriodicalId":46851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Chinese EFL teachers’ perceptions of creativity and criticality in assessment practices: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Wenli Xu, Li Sheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijal.12599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various studies have highlighted the significant role of creativity and criticality in English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts. Yet, their contribution to and mechanism in assessment domains are widely neglected. To address this shortcoming in the literature, the present study took advantage of a qualitative design via a semi‐structured interview with a sample of 29 Chinese EFL teachers to unravel their perceptions of creativity and criticality in second language (L2) assessment practices. The interview results pinpointed that Chinese EFL teachers regarded both creativity and criticality as valuable skills, which can be nurtured via various assessment practices in the class. Specifically, the participants maintained that creativity could be measured and improved by using “multimedia and technologies,” “games and scenarios,” “mind maps,” and “authentic assessment.” Likewise, criticality can be developed in learners through “debates and discussions,” “role play,” “written tests like argumentative essays,” and “oral interviews.” The findings are discussed about prior research and implications are suggested to EFL teachers, teacher educators, and curriculum designers to increase their understanding and implementation of assessment practices oriented to creativity and criticality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12599\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring Chinese EFL teachers’ perceptions of creativity and criticality in assessment practices: A qualitative study
Various studies have highlighted the significant role of creativity and criticality in English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts. Yet, their contribution to and mechanism in assessment domains are widely neglected. To address this shortcoming in the literature, the present study took advantage of a qualitative design via a semi‐structured interview with a sample of 29 Chinese EFL teachers to unravel their perceptions of creativity and criticality in second language (L2) assessment practices. The interview results pinpointed that Chinese EFL teachers regarded both creativity and criticality as valuable skills, which can be nurtured via various assessment practices in the class. Specifically, the participants maintained that creativity could be measured and improved by using “multimedia and technologies,” “games and scenarios,” “mind maps,” and “authentic assessment.” Likewise, criticality can be developed in learners through “debates and discussions,” “role play,” “written tests like argumentative essays,” and “oral interviews.” The findings are discussed about prior research and implications are suggested to EFL teachers, teacher educators, and curriculum designers to increase their understanding and implementation of assessment practices oriented to creativity and criticality.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Applied Linguistics (InJAL) publishes articles that explore the relationship between expertise in linguistics, broadly defined, and the everyday experience of language. Its scope is international in that it welcomes articles which show explicitly how local issues of language use or learning exemplify more global concerns.