格鲁吉亚开放式治理框架下的电子政务:现状、问题和机遇

M. Jibladze, Irakli Manvelidze, Ineza Zoidze, Giga Phartenadze
{"title":"格鲁吉亚开放式治理框架下的电子政务:现状、问题和机遇","authors":"M. Jibladze, Irakli Manvelidze, Ineza Zoidze, Giga Phartenadze","doi":"10.1108/pap-05-2023-0074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe paper explores how local authorities, particularly under the Open Government Partnership (OGP), respond to e-governance challenges in Georgia.Design/methodology/approachA weighted scoring system is adopted to assess e-governance in six OGP local authorities (Akhaltsikhe, Khoni, Kutaisi, Ozurgeti, Rustavi, and Tbilisi) in four areas, including access to information, digital service delivery, data management, and citizen engagement. Moreover, website analysis with a focus on transparency and citizen engagement supplements the evaluation.FindingsThe findings illustrate that the six local authorities have made certain accomplishments in e-governance and taken steps towards open government; however, these efforts lack coordination and systematic planning. Tbilisi embraces open governance principles with comprehensive action plans, strong transparency commitment, and engaging digital platforms. Kutaisi demonstrates notable progress with user-friendly digital platforms and a streamlined open data portal, emphasizing transparency. Rustavi shows significant development in digital service delivery and citizen engagement and a reputation as a transparent local government. Akhaltsikhe faces challenges in electronic service delivery and citizen engagement. Ozurgeti also encounters obstacles in information disclosure and electronic service delivery, while Khoni lags in information accessibility and citizen engagement.Originality/valueThis research is novel in studying the level of e-government among OGP local members in Georgia by a scoring system. The analysis will empower the government to proactively modify and adjust the situation on a regional scale, aligning with the challenges inherent in the country’s unique experiences.","PeriodicalId":516004,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Policy","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-governance under the framework of open governance in Georgia: current situation, problems and opportunities\",\"authors\":\"M. Jibladze, Irakli Manvelidze, Ineza Zoidze, Giga Phartenadze\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/pap-05-2023-0074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe paper explores how local authorities, particularly under the Open Government Partnership (OGP), respond to e-governance challenges in Georgia.Design/methodology/approachA weighted scoring system is adopted to assess e-governance in six OGP local authorities (Akhaltsikhe, Khoni, Kutaisi, Ozurgeti, Rustavi, and Tbilisi) in four areas, including access to information, digital service delivery, data management, and citizen engagement. Moreover, website analysis with a focus on transparency and citizen engagement supplements the evaluation.FindingsThe findings illustrate that the six local authorities have made certain accomplishments in e-governance and taken steps towards open government; however, these efforts lack coordination and systematic planning. Tbilisi embraces open governance principles with comprehensive action plans, strong transparency commitment, and engaging digital platforms. Kutaisi demonstrates notable progress with user-friendly digital platforms and a streamlined open data portal, emphasizing transparency. Rustavi shows significant development in digital service delivery and citizen engagement and a reputation as a transparent local government. Akhaltsikhe faces challenges in electronic service delivery and citizen engagement. Ozurgeti also encounters obstacles in information disclosure and electronic service delivery, while Khoni lags in information accessibility and citizen engagement.Originality/valueThis research is novel in studying the level of e-government among OGP local members in Georgia by a scoring system. The analysis will empower the government to proactively modify and adjust the situation on a regional scale, aligning with the challenges inherent in the country’s unique experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Administration and Policy\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Administration and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-05-2023-0074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-05-2023-0074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了格鲁吉亚地方当局,尤其是开放政府伙伴计划(OGP)下的地方当局,如何应对电子政务方面的挑战。采用加权评分系统对六个开放政府伙伴计划地方当局(阿哈尔捷什、霍尼、库塔伊西、奥祖尔盖蒂、鲁斯塔维和第比利斯)在信息获取、数字服务提供、数据管理和公民参与等四个方面的电子政务情况进行了评估。此外,以透明度和公民参与为重点的网站分析也是对评估的补充。评估结果评估结果表明,六个地方当局在电子政务方面取得了一定成就,并采取了开放式政府的措施;但是,这些努力缺乏协调和系统规划。第比利斯奉行开放式治理原则,制定了全面的行动计划,作出了强有力的透明度承诺,并推出了吸引人的数字平台。库塔伊西在用户友好型数字平台和精简的开放数据门户网站方面取得了显著进展,并强调了透明度。鲁斯塔维在数字服务提供和公民参与方面取得了重大发展,并享有透明地方政府的美誉。阿卡齐赫在提供电子服务和公民参与方面面临挑战。奥祖尔盖季在信息披露和电子服务提供方面也遇到了障碍,而霍尼在信息可获取性和公民参与方面则比较落后。该分析将使政府有能力在地区范围内积极修改和调整情况,以应对该国独特经验中固有的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
E-governance under the framework of open governance in Georgia: current situation, problems and opportunities
PurposeThe paper explores how local authorities, particularly under the Open Government Partnership (OGP), respond to e-governance challenges in Georgia.Design/methodology/approachA weighted scoring system is adopted to assess e-governance in six OGP local authorities (Akhaltsikhe, Khoni, Kutaisi, Ozurgeti, Rustavi, and Tbilisi) in four areas, including access to information, digital service delivery, data management, and citizen engagement. Moreover, website analysis with a focus on transparency and citizen engagement supplements the evaluation.FindingsThe findings illustrate that the six local authorities have made certain accomplishments in e-governance and taken steps towards open government; however, these efforts lack coordination and systematic planning. Tbilisi embraces open governance principles with comprehensive action plans, strong transparency commitment, and engaging digital platforms. Kutaisi demonstrates notable progress with user-friendly digital platforms and a streamlined open data portal, emphasizing transparency. Rustavi shows significant development in digital service delivery and citizen engagement and a reputation as a transparent local government. Akhaltsikhe faces challenges in electronic service delivery and citizen engagement. Ozurgeti also encounters obstacles in information disclosure and electronic service delivery, while Khoni lags in information accessibility and citizen engagement.Originality/valueThis research is novel in studying the level of e-government among OGP local members in Georgia by a scoring system. The analysis will empower the government to proactively modify and adjust the situation on a regional scale, aligning with the challenges inherent in the country’s unique experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信