Varun Sabu Sam, Anand Nammalvar, Diana Andrushia, Beulah Gnana Ananthi Gurupatham, Krishanu Roy
{"title":"高温条件下镀锌铁基冷弯型钢背靠背组合梁的挠曲性能","authors":"Varun Sabu Sam, Anand Nammalvar, Diana Andrushia, Beulah Gnana Ananthi Gurupatham, Krishanu Roy","doi":"10.3390/buildings14082456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cold-formed steel (CFS) sections have become popular in construction due to several advantages over structural steel. However, research on the performance of galvanized iron (GI)-based CFS under high temperatures, especially regarding its flexural behavior, has been limited. This study extensively investigates how GI-based CFS beams with varying spans behave under elevated temperatures and subsequent cooling using air and water. This study examines the impact of temperature loading and compares the effectiveness of air- and water-cooling methods. Experimental results are validated and analyzed alongside findings from finite element modeling (FEM) using ABAQUS (2019_09_13-23.19.31) and the Direct Strength Method (DSM). Additionally, this study conducts a parametric investigation to assess how beam span influences flexural capacity. Among beams heated to the same temperature, those cooled with water show slightly lower load capacities compared to those cooled with air. The highest load capacity observed is 64.3 kN for the reference specimen, while the lowest is 26.2 kN for the specimen heated for 90 min and cooled with water, a 59.27% difference between them. Stiffness decreases as heating duration increases, with the reference section exhibiting significantly higher stiffness compared to the section heated for 90 min and cooled with water, with a 92.76% difference in stiffness. As heating duration increases, ductility also increases. Various failure modes are observed based on different heating and cooling conditions across different beam spans. This study provides insights into how GI-based CFS beams perform under temperature stress and different cooling scenarios, contributing valuable data for structural design and safety considerations in construction.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":"24 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexural Behavior of Galvanized Iron Based Cold-Formed Steel Back-to-Back Built-Up Beams at Elevated Temperatures\",\"authors\":\"Varun Sabu Sam, Anand Nammalvar, Diana Andrushia, Beulah Gnana Ananthi Gurupatham, Krishanu Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/buildings14082456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cold-formed steel (CFS) sections have become popular in construction due to several advantages over structural steel. However, research on the performance of galvanized iron (GI)-based CFS under high temperatures, especially regarding its flexural behavior, has been limited. This study extensively investigates how GI-based CFS beams with varying spans behave under elevated temperatures and subsequent cooling using air and water. This study examines the impact of temperature loading and compares the effectiveness of air- and water-cooling methods. Experimental results are validated and analyzed alongside findings from finite element modeling (FEM) using ABAQUS (2019_09_13-23.19.31) and the Direct Strength Method (DSM). Additionally, this study conducts a parametric investigation to assess how beam span influences flexural capacity. Among beams heated to the same temperature, those cooled with water show slightly lower load capacities compared to those cooled with air. The highest load capacity observed is 64.3 kN for the reference specimen, while the lowest is 26.2 kN for the specimen heated for 90 min and cooled with water, a 59.27% difference between them. Stiffness decreases as heating duration increases, with the reference section exhibiting significantly higher stiffness compared to the section heated for 90 min and cooled with water, with a 92.76% difference in stiffness. As heating duration increases, ductility also increases. Various failure modes are observed based on different heating and cooling conditions across different beam spans. This study provides insights into how GI-based CFS beams perform under temperature stress and different cooling scenarios, contributing valuable data for structural design and safety considerations in construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":\"24 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082456\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flexural Behavior of Galvanized Iron Based Cold-Formed Steel Back-to-Back Built-Up Beams at Elevated Temperatures
Cold-formed steel (CFS) sections have become popular in construction due to several advantages over structural steel. However, research on the performance of galvanized iron (GI)-based CFS under high temperatures, especially regarding its flexural behavior, has been limited. This study extensively investigates how GI-based CFS beams with varying spans behave under elevated temperatures and subsequent cooling using air and water. This study examines the impact of temperature loading and compares the effectiveness of air- and water-cooling methods. Experimental results are validated and analyzed alongside findings from finite element modeling (FEM) using ABAQUS (2019_09_13-23.19.31) and the Direct Strength Method (DSM). Additionally, this study conducts a parametric investigation to assess how beam span influences flexural capacity. Among beams heated to the same temperature, those cooled with water show slightly lower load capacities compared to those cooled with air. The highest load capacity observed is 64.3 kN for the reference specimen, while the lowest is 26.2 kN for the specimen heated for 90 min and cooled with water, a 59.27% difference between them. Stiffness decreases as heating duration increases, with the reference section exhibiting significantly higher stiffness compared to the section heated for 90 min and cooled with water, with a 92.76% difference in stiffness. As heating duration increases, ductility also increases. Various failure modes are observed based on different heating and cooling conditions across different beam spans. This study provides insights into how GI-based CFS beams perform under temperature stress and different cooling scenarios, contributing valuable data for structural design and safety considerations in construction.
期刊介绍:
ACS Applied Electronic Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of electronic materials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials science, engineering, optics, physics, and chemistry into important applications of electronic materials. Sample research topics that span the journal's scope are inorganic, organic, ionic and polymeric materials with properties that include conducting, semiconducting, superconducting, insulating, dielectric, magnetic, optoelectronic, piezoelectric, ferroelectric and thermoelectric.
Indexed/Abstracted:
Web of Science SCIE
Scopus
CAS
INSPEC
Portico