基于 WCA 的施工过程匹配分析评估方法

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Hongyu Ye, Hong Zhang, Minjie Sun, Yihan Lv, Wensheng Yang, Yinan Gong, Baolin Huang, Meng Cong
{"title":"基于 WCA 的施工过程匹配分析评估方法","authors":"Hongyu Ye, Hong Zhang, Minjie Sun, Yihan Lv, Wensheng Yang, Yinan Gong, Baolin Huang, Meng Cong","doi":"10.3390/buildings14082457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing construction process optimization and efficiency is crucial for the industry, yet quantitative methods for comparison are lacking. We propose the process matching degree (PMD) to quantitatively assess construction processes, enhancing efficiency and sustainability. Five primary indicators—regulations, environment, equipment, components, and organization—were identified, each of which were initially weighted equally using the weighted criteria approach (WCA). To refine the assessment, we conducted a questionnaire survey to adjust these weights based on expert feedback. Three sub-indicators were introduced for each primary indicator to increase granularity. The PMD’s operability was verified through two cases study involving BIM-simulated and real construction processes. The light-steel-structure building’s PMD values were 68 and 58 points, and the concrete structure’s PMD was 88.25, respectively, and the reasons for these differences were analyzed. This paper introduces PMD, its evaluation indicators, and calculation method, and verifies its feasibility through cases studies and expert questionnaire surveys, providing a comprehensive PMD research methodology.","PeriodicalId":48546,"journal":{"name":"Buildings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A WCA-Based Evaluation Approach for Matching Analysis of the Construction Process\",\"authors\":\"Hongyu Ye, Hong Zhang, Minjie Sun, Yihan Lv, Wensheng Yang, Yinan Gong, Baolin Huang, Meng Cong\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/buildings14082457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assessing construction process optimization and efficiency is crucial for the industry, yet quantitative methods for comparison are lacking. We propose the process matching degree (PMD) to quantitatively assess construction processes, enhancing efficiency and sustainability. Five primary indicators—regulations, environment, equipment, components, and organization—were identified, each of which were initially weighted equally using the weighted criteria approach (WCA). To refine the assessment, we conducted a questionnaire survey to adjust these weights based on expert feedback. Three sub-indicators were introduced for each primary indicator to increase granularity. The PMD’s operability was verified through two cases study involving BIM-simulated and real construction processes. The light-steel-structure building’s PMD values were 68 and 58 points, and the concrete structure’s PMD was 88.25, respectively, and the reasons for these differences were analyzed. This paper introduces PMD, its evaluation indicators, and calculation method, and verifies its feasibility through cases studies and expert questionnaire surveys, providing a comprehensive PMD research methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buildings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082457\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估建筑流程的优化和效率对建筑行业至关重要,但目前还缺乏量化的比较方法。我们提出了流程匹配度(PMD)来量化评估施工流程,从而提高效率和可持续性。我们确定了五个主要指标--法规、环境、设备、部件和组织,并使用加权标准法(WCA)对每个指标进行了初步加权。为了完善评估,我们进行了一次问卷调查,根据专家的反馈意见对这些权重进行了调整。每个主要指标都引入了三个次级指标,以增加细化程度。PMD 的可操作性通过涉及 BIM 模拟和实际施工过程的两个案例研究得到验证。轻钢结构建筑的 PMD 值分别为 68 分和 58 分,混凝土结构的 PMD 值为 88.25 分,并分析了造成这些差异的原因。本文介绍了 PMD 及其评价指标和计算方法,并通过案例研究和专家问卷调查验证了其可行性,提供了一种全面的 PMD 研究方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A WCA-Based Evaluation Approach for Matching Analysis of the Construction Process
Assessing construction process optimization and efficiency is crucial for the industry, yet quantitative methods for comparison are lacking. We propose the process matching degree (PMD) to quantitatively assess construction processes, enhancing efficiency and sustainability. Five primary indicators—regulations, environment, equipment, components, and organization—were identified, each of which were initially weighted equally using the weighted criteria approach (WCA). To refine the assessment, we conducted a questionnaire survey to adjust these weights based on expert feedback. Three sub-indicators were introduced for each primary indicator to increase granularity. The PMD’s operability was verified through two cases study involving BIM-simulated and real construction processes. The light-steel-structure building’s PMD values were 68 and 58 points, and the concrete structure’s PMD was 88.25, respectively, and the reasons for these differences were analyzed. This paper introduces PMD, its evaluation indicators, and calculation method, and verifies its feasibility through cases studies and expert questionnaire surveys, providing a comprehensive PMD research methodology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Buildings
Buildings Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
26.30%
发文量
1883
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: BUILDINGS content is primarily staff-written and submitted information is evaluated by the editors for its value to the audience. Such information may be used in articles with appropriate attribution to the source. The editorial staff considers information on the following topics: -Issues directed at building owners and facility managers in North America -Issues relevant to existing buildings, including retrofits, maintenance and modernization -Solution-based content, such as tips and tricks -New construction but only with an eye to issues involving maintenance and operation We generally do not review the following topics because these are not relevant to our readers: -Information on the residential market with the exception of multifamily buildings -International news unrelated to the North American market -Real estate market updates or construction updates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信