两种不同类型的运动量对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗受试者运动能力、体力活动和生活质量的影响:一项试点研究

Q3 Health Professions
A. Angarita-Fonseca, A.M. Jácome-Hortúa, Andrea Juliana Ortiz-Patiño, Zully Rocío Rincón-Rueda, Carmen Juliana Villamizar-Jaimes, Erica Tatiana Paredes-Prada, J. C. Sánchez-Delgado
{"title":"两种不同类型的运动量对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗受试者运动能力、体力活动和生活质量的影响:一项试点研究","authors":"A. Angarita-Fonseca, A.M. Jácome-Hortúa, Andrea Juliana Ortiz-Patiño, Zully Rocío Rincón-Rueda, Carmen Juliana Villamizar-Jaimes, Erica Tatiana Paredes-Prada, J. C. Sánchez-Delgado","doi":"10.5114/pq/178246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phase II of cardiac rehabilitation includes 36 sessions of exercise developed over 12 weeks, an intervention format that seems to be based on historical practice and not on scientific evidence. The objective was to evaluate the effect of two types of exercise volumes on exercise capacity, physical activity levels, and quality of life in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.A randomized controlled clinical trial was performed in 17 subjects, who were randomly assigned to two groups. The first (n = 7) was trained for eight consecutive weeks, and the second (n = 10) for 12 weeks. The six-minute walk test, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and the SF-36 were applied before starting the cardiac rehabilitation program at 8 and 12 weeks.No significant differences were found between the intervention groups. The rise of VO2max was only significant in the 8-week group. Both groups improved the distance walked and sedentary behaviour. The 12-week intervention group improved the quality of life, specifically in physical functioning, and the 8-week intervention group in the domains of social function, physical, and emotional role. Additionally, the percentage of participants meeting physical activity recommendations was higher in the 12-week cardiac rehabilitation group.The implication for the practice is that the exercise traditionally used in cardiac rehabilitation shows early changes in exercise capacity and quality of life. The results of the levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour improved after 12 weeks of rehabilitation without the presence of adverse events.","PeriodicalId":37315,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Quarterly","volume":"35 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of two different types of exercise volumes on exercise capacity, physical activity and quality of life in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"A. Angarita-Fonseca, A.M. Jácome-Hortúa, Andrea Juliana Ortiz-Patiño, Zully Rocío Rincón-Rueda, Carmen Juliana Villamizar-Jaimes, Erica Tatiana Paredes-Prada, J. C. Sánchez-Delgado\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pq/178246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Phase II of cardiac rehabilitation includes 36 sessions of exercise developed over 12 weeks, an intervention format that seems to be based on historical practice and not on scientific evidence. The objective was to evaluate the effect of two types of exercise volumes on exercise capacity, physical activity levels, and quality of life in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.A randomized controlled clinical trial was performed in 17 subjects, who were randomly assigned to two groups. The first (n = 7) was trained for eight consecutive weeks, and the second (n = 10) for 12 weeks. The six-minute walk test, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and the SF-36 were applied before starting the cardiac rehabilitation program at 8 and 12 weeks.No significant differences were found between the intervention groups. The rise of VO2max was only significant in the 8-week group. Both groups improved the distance walked and sedentary behaviour. The 12-week intervention group improved the quality of life, specifically in physical functioning, and the 8-week intervention group in the domains of social function, physical, and emotional role. Additionally, the percentage of participants meeting physical activity recommendations was higher in the 12-week cardiac rehabilitation group.The implication for the practice is that the exercise traditionally used in cardiac rehabilitation shows early changes in exercise capacity and quality of life. The results of the levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour improved after 12 weeks of rehabilitation without the presence of adverse events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"35 27\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pq/178246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pq/178246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏康复的第二阶段包括在 12 周内进行 36 次锻炼,这种干预形式似乎是基于历史实践而非科学证据。该研究旨在评估两种运动量对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的受试者的运动能力、体力活动水平和生活质量的影响。第一组(7 人)连续训练 8 周,第二组(10 人)连续训练 12 周。在 8 周和 12 周的心脏康复计划开始前,对受试者进行了六分钟步行测试、国际体力活动调查问卷和 SF-36 指数。干预组之间没有发现明显的差异,只有 8 周组的 VO2max 上升显著。两组的步行距离和久坐行为都有所改善。为期 12 周的干预组提高了生活质量,特别是在身体功能方面,而为期 8 周的干预组则提高了社会功能、身体和情感角色方面的生活质量。此外,在为期 12 周的心脏康复组中,符合体育锻炼建议的参与者比例更高。这对实践的意义在于,传统上用于心脏康复的锻炼方式会在早期显示出运动能力和生活质量的变化。经过 12 周的康复后,体力活动水平和久坐行为的结果都有所改善,且没有出现不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of two different types of exercise volumes on exercise capacity, physical activity and quality of life in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot study
Phase II of cardiac rehabilitation includes 36 sessions of exercise developed over 12 weeks, an intervention format that seems to be based on historical practice and not on scientific evidence. The objective was to evaluate the effect of two types of exercise volumes on exercise capacity, physical activity levels, and quality of life in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.A randomized controlled clinical trial was performed in 17 subjects, who were randomly assigned to two groups. The first (n = 7) was trained for eight consecutive weeks, and the second (n = 10) for 12 weeks. The six-minute walk test, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and the SF-36 were applied before starting the cardiac rehabilitation program at 8 and 12 weeks.No significant differences were found between the intervention groups. The rise of VO2max was only significant in the 8-week group. Both groups improved the distance walked and sedentary behaviour. The 12-week intervention group improved the quality of life, specifically in physical functioning, and the 8-week intervention group in the domains of social function, physical, and emotional role. Additionally, the percentage of participants meeting physical activity recommendations was higher in the 12-week cardiac rehabilitation group.The implication for the practice is that the exercise traditionally used in cardiac rehabilitation shows early changes in exercise capacity and quality of life. The results of the levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour improved after 12 weeks of rehabilitation without the presence of adverse events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Quarterly
Physiotherapy Quarterly Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Quarterly ISSN 2544-4395 (formerly Fizjoterapia ISSN 1230-8323) is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published in both paper and electronic format by the University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Poland. The original version of the journal is its paper issue. The Editorial Office accepts original papers on various aspects of physiotherapy and rehabilitation for publication. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical physiotherapy science are published at the highest priority. Letters to the Editor, reports from scientific meetings and book reviews are also considered. Physiotherapy Quarterly publishes papers that show depth, rigor, originality and high-quality presentation. The scope of the journal: evidence-based rehabilitation; the mechanisms of function or dysfunction; modern therapy methods; best clinical practice; clinical reasoning and decision-making processes; assessment and clinical management of disorders; exploration of relevant clinical interventions; multi-modal approaches; psychosocial issues; expectations, experiences, and perspectives of physiotherapists. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research articles are welcomed, together with systematic and high-quality narrative reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信