基于指标的农村发展定量评价

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Alexandra Stankulova, Alice Barreca, Manuela Rebaudengo, D. Rolando
{"title":"基于指标的农村发展定量评价","authors":"Alexandra Stankulova, Alice Barreca, Manuela Rebaudengo, D. Rolando","doi":"10.1177/01600176241268028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last century has been characterised by very fast industrialisation and population growth, causing strong outmigration from the rural territories, further increasing the socio-economic gap between the rural and urban areas. To counteract these problems, a lot of scholars have started studying rural development and the methodologies that could be applied to its evaluation. The main research objective of the present work is to investigate on a worldwide scale how rural development is being evaluated and, more in detail, to study the quantitative indicator-based approaches used for this kind of evaluation. Bibliometric analysis was performed with the aim of understanding in a better way the state of the scientific development of the research topic. Its duality, reflected by the nature of the phenomenon (negative or positive) from which the studies have origin from, has been confirmed. During the process of research has also encountered a new perspective – a more neutral one, with central concept the quality of life. Regarding the study of the quantitative indicator-based approaches, 47 selected papers have been analysed in detail and an extensive database containing 32 dimensions, 72 sub-dimensions and 892 indicators was created. Some universal dimensions and indicators have been encountered, although it cannot be known whether they are truly comparable due to the lack of transparency present in different research. For the future development and dissemination of these approaches, it is necessary to achieve greater transparency in how they are calculated and greater availability of open data.","PeriodicalId":51507,"journal":{"name":"International Regional Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Quantitative Indicator-Based Evaluation for Rural Development\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Stankulova, Alice Barreca, Manuela Rebaudengo, D. Rolando\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01600176241268028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The last century has been characterised by very fast industrialisation and population growth, causing strong outmigration from the rural territories, further increasing the socio-economic gap between the rural and urban areas. To counteract these problems, a lot of scholars have started studying rural development and the methodologies that could be applied to its evaluation. The main research objective of the present work is to investigate on a worldwide scale how rural development is being evaluated and, more in detail, to study the quantitative indicator-based approaches used for this kind of evaluation. Bibliometric analysis was performed with the aim of understanding in a better way the state of the scientific development of the research topic. Its duality, reflected by the nature of the phenomenon (negative or positive) from which the studies have origin from, has been confirmed. During the process of research has also encountered a new perspective – a more neutral one, with central concept the quality of life. Regarding the study of the quantitative indicator-based approaches, 47 selected papers have been analysed in detail and an extensive database containing 32 dimensions, 72 sub-dimensions and 892 indicators was created. Some universal dimensions and indicators have been encountered, although it cannot be known whether they are truly comparable due to the lack of transparency present in different research. For the future development and dissemination of these approaches, it is necessary to achieve greater transparency in how they are calculated and greater availability of open data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Regional Science Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Regional Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01600176241268028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Regional Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01600176241268028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上个世纪的特点是工业化和人口增长非常快,导致农村人口大量外迁,进一步拉大了城乡之间的社会经济差距。为了解决这些问题,许多学者开始研究农村发展及其评估方法。本著作的主要研究目标是在世界范围内调查如何评估农村发展,并更详细地研究用于此类评估的基于量化指标的方法。进行文献计量分析的目的是更好地了解研究课题的科学发展状况。通过研究的现象性质(消极或积极),证实了研究的双重性。在研究过程中,还发现了一个新的视角--以生活质量为中心概念的更加中性的视角。关于以量化指标为基础的研究方法,已对 47 篇选定论文进行了详细分析,并建立了一个包含 32 个维度、72 个子维度和 892 个指标的庞大数据库。虽然由于不同的研究缺乏透明度,无法确定它们是否具有真正的可比性,但还是发现了一些通用的维度和指标。为了今后发展和推广这些方法,有必要提高计算方法的透明度,并提供更多的公开数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Quantitative Indicator-Based Evaluation for Rural Development
The last century has been characterised by very fast industrialisation and population growth, causing strong outmigration from the rural territories, further increasing the socio-economic gap between the rural and urban areas. To counteract these problems, a lot of scholars have started studying rural development and the methodologies that could be applied to its evaluation. The main research objective of the present work is to investigate on a worldwide scale how rural development is being evaluated and, more in detail, to study the quantitative indicator-based approaches used for this kind of evaluation. Bibliometric analysis was performed with the aim of understanding in a better way the state of the scientific development of the research topic. Its duality, reflected by the nature of the phenomenon (negative or positive) from which the studies have origin from, has been confirmed. During the process of research has also encountered a new perspective – a more neutral one, with central concept the quality of life. Regarding the study of the quantitative indicator-based approaches, 47 selected papers have been analysed in detail and an extensive database containing 32 dimensions, 72 sub-dimensions and 892 indicators was created. Some universal dimensions and indicators have been encountered, although it cannot be known whether they are truly comparable due to the lack of transparency present in different research. For the future development and dissemination of these approaches, it is necessary to achieve greater transparency in how they are calculated and greater availability of open data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
13.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: International Regional Science Review serves as an international forum for economists, geographers, planners, and other social scientists to share important research findings and methodological breakthroughs. The journal serves as a catalyst for improving spatial and regional analysis within the social sciences and stimulating communication among the disciplines. IRSR deliberately helps define regional science by publishing key interdisciplinary survey articles that summarize and evaluate previous research and identify fruitful research directions. Focusing on issues of theory, method, and public policy where the spatial or regional dimension is central, IRSR strives to promote useful scholarly research that is securely tied to the real world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信