在报告知识资本时,财务重要性判断重要吗?系统文献综述与未来研究趋势

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Matteo Pozzoli, Francesco Paolone, Elbano de Nuccio, Riccardo Tiscini
{"title":"在报告知识资本时,财务重要性判断重要吗?系统文献综述与未来研究趋势","authors":"Matteo Pozzoli, Francesco Paolone, Elbano de Nuccio, Riccardo Tiscini","doi":"10.1108/jic-03-2024-0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to investigate materiality judgement providing insights, critiques and future research paths in light of the open debate on the role of materiality in corporate financial disclosure, highlighting potential connections and implications with sustainability and intellectual capital (IC) reporting.Design/methodology/approachThe research presents an overview of the analysis of financial materiality, including new stimuli from recent studies and regulatory requirements for financial and non-financial reporting. Accordingly, this study used a systematic literature review (SLR) based on a combination of content, text and bibliometric analysis of materiality in accounting research studies, collecting data from the Scopus database as one of the most relevant repositories.FindingsThe SLR identified four relevant research trends, concerning: (1) the relevance of materiality principles in corporate disclosure; (2) financial reporting practices and materiality; (3) theories and approaches in defining financial materiality and (4) the existence of quantitative and qualitative thresholds in the materiality judgement.Research limitations/implicationsThe results provide theoretical and practical implications when comprehending the development of the concept of financial materiality in financial statements and whether they can be appropriate in reporting IC as well. We identified future research paths.Practical implicationsFrom a practical perspective, this study is useful for companies implementing financial materiality based on stakeholder engagement and improving their transparency in financial and non-financial reporting practices.Social implicationsThe research investigates if the process for assessing materiality is in line with the expectations of all stakeholders involved in financial and non-financial reporting.Originality/valueThis research is the first to investigate the scientific basis and applicability of the concept of financial materiality to sustainability and IC reporting.","PeriodicalId":48191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Capital","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does financial materiality judgement matter in reporting intellectual capital? A systematic literature review and future research trends\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Pozzoli, Francesco Paolone, Elbano de Nuccio, Riccardo Tiscini\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jic-03-2024-0083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper aims to investigate materiality judgement providing insights, critiques and future research paths in light of the open debate on the role of materiality in corporate financial disclosure, highlighting potential connections and implications with sustainability and intellectual capital (IC) reporting.Design/methodology/approachThe research presents an overview of the analysis of financial materiality, including new stimuli from recent studies and regulatory requirements for financial and non-financial reporting. Accordingly, this study used a systematic literature review (SLR) based on a combination of content, text and bibliometric analysis of materiality in accounting research studies, collecting data from the Scopus database as one of the most relevant repositories.FindingsThe SLR identified four relevant research trends, concerning: (1) the relevance of materiality principles in corporate disclosure; (2) financial reporting practices and materiality; (3) theories and approaches in defining financial materiality and (4) the existence of quantitative and qualitative thresholds in the materiality judgement.Research limitations/implicationsThe results provide theoretical and practical implications when comprehending the development of the concept of financial materiality in financial statements and whether they can be appropriate in reporting IC as well. We identified future research paths.Practical implicationsFrom a practical perspective, this study is useful for companies implementing financial materiality based on stakeholder engagement and improving their transparency in financial and non-financial reporting practices.Social implicationsThe research investigates if the process for assessing materiality is in line with the expectations of all stakeholders involved in financial and non-financial reporting.Originality/valueThis research is the first to investigate the scientific basis and applicability of the concept of financial materiality to sustainability and IC reporting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Capital\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Capital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-03-2024-0083\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Capital","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-03-2024-0083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在研究实质性判断,针对实质性在企业财务披露中的作用这一公开讨论提供见解、批评和未来研究路径,并强调与可持续发展和智力资本(IC)报告之间的潜在联系和影响。因此,本研究采用了系统文献综述(SLR)的方法,结合会计研究中实质性的内容、文本和文献计量分析,从最相关的资料库之一 Scopus 数据库中收集数据。研究结果SLR 确定了四个相关的研究趋势,涉及:(1) 重要性原则在企业披露中的相关性;(2) 财务报告实践与重要性;(3) 界定财务重要性的理论和方法;(4) 重要性判断中存在的定量和定性阈值。从实践的角度来看,本研究有助于企业在利益相关者参与的基础上实施财务重要性,并提高其财务和非财务报告实践的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does financial materiality judgement matter in reporting intellectual capital? A systematic literature review and future research trends
PurposeThis paper aims to investigate materiality judgement providing insights, critiques and future research paths in light of the open debate on the role of materiality in corporate financial disclosure, highlighting potential connections and implications with sustainability and intellectual capital (IC) reporting.Design/methodology/approachThe research presents an overview of the analysis of financial materiality, including new stimuli from recent studies and regulatory requirements for financial and non-financial reporting. Accordingly, this study used a systematic literature review (SLR) based on a combination of content, text and bibliometric analysis of materiality in accounting research studies, collecting data from the Scopus database as one of the most relevant repositories.FindingsThe SLR identified four relevant research trends, concerning: (1) the relevance of materiality principles in corporate disclosure; (2) financial reporting practices and materiality; (3) theories and approaches in defining financial materiality and (4) the existence of quantitative and qualitative thresholds in the materiality judgement.Research limitations/implicationsThe results provide theoretical and practical implications when comprehending the development of the concept of financial materiality in financial statements and whether they can be appropriate in reporting IC as well. We identified future research paths.Practical implicationsFrom a practical perspective, this study is useful for companies implementing financial materiality based on stakeholder engagement and improving their transparency in financial and non-financial reporting practices.Social implicationsThe research investigates if the process for assessing materiality is in line with the expectations of all stakeholders involved in financial and non-financial reporting.Originality/valueThis research is the first to investigate the scientific basis and applicability of the concept of financial materiality to sustainability and IC reporting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Capital is a peer-reviewed international publication dedicated to the exchange of the latest research and best practice information on all aspects of creating, identifying, managing and measuring intellectual capital in organisations. The journal publishes original research and case studies by academic, business and public sector contributors on intellectual capital strategies, approaches, frameworks, tools, techniques and technologies in order to increase the understanding of intellectual capital within the context of the modern knowledge economy. The focus of this journal is on the identification of innovative intellectual capital strategies and the application of theoretical concepts to real-world situations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信