评估脑瘫儿童姿势的临床工具:系统综述

IF 0.8 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aarti Gupta, Anushree Rai, Siddhartha Sen
{"title":"评估脑瘫儿童姿势的临床工具:系统综述","authors":"Aarti Gupta, Anushree Rai, Siddhartha Sen","doi":"10.25259/jnrp_84_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe goal of this comprehensive evaluation of the literature is to evaluate the methodological quality of the tools available for measuring a child’s posture in relation to cerebral palsy (CP) in accordance with the consensus-based criteria for selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) criteria and checklist.\n\n\n\nThe following inclusion criteria were applied while screening studies found in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to determine their eligibility: (1) Clinical examinations of the posture of children with CP; (2) age of 3 years or more at all gross motor function classification system levels; (3) posture evaluation measures described; (4) statistics on responsiveness, validity, and reliability for children with CP; and (5) published in peer-reviewed English-language journals. Data on study features, tool or scale characteristics, and study outcomes were evaluated and discussed. The “quality of research” was evaluated using the COSMIN.\n\n\n\nSeven tools were found and included in this study out of 349,928 studies. Of these, three were observational measurements and four were instruments. The quality of the studies was very good in 40%, adequate in another 40%, and inadequate in the rest of the 20% studies. The evidence’s level of quality for the posture assessment tool’s measurement quality ranged from very low to low. However, none of the tools evaluated every COSMIN-recommended property. There was a lack of evidence about these measures’ responsiveness.\n\n\n\nResearch on the measuring quality of tools used to evaluate posture in children with CP is scarce and of low quality. In accordance with the COSMIN guidelines, additional studies are required. The PROSPERO database has this review registered under the number CRD42022333121.\n","PeriodicalId":16443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical tools to assess posture in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Aarti Gupta, Anushree Rai, Siddhartha Sen\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/jnrp_84_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThe goal of this comprehensive evaluation of the literature is to evaluate the methodological quality of the tools available for measuring a child’s posture in relation to cerebral palsy (CP) in accordance with the consensus-based criteria for selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) criteria and checklist.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe following inclusion criteria were applied while screening studies found in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to determine their eligibility: (1) Clinical examinations of the posture of children with CP; (2) age of 3 years or more at all gross motor function classification system levels; (3) posture evaluation measures described; (4) statistics on responsiveness, validity, and reliability for children with CP; and (5) published in peer-reviewed English-language journals. Data on study features, tool or scale characteristics, and study outcomes were evaluated and discussed. The “quality of research” was evaluated using the COSMIN.\\n\\n\\n\\nSeven tools were found and included in this study out of 349,928 studies. Of these, three were observational measurements and four were instruments. The quality of the studies was very good in 40%, adequate in another 40%, and inadequate in the rest of the 20% studies. The evidence’s level of quality for the posture assessment tool’s measurement quality ranged from very low to low. However, none of the tools evaluated every COSMIN-recommended property. There was a lack of evidence about these measures’ responsiveness.\\n\\n\\n\\nResearch on the measuring quality of tools used to evaluate posture in children with CP is scarce and of low quality. In accordance with the COSMIN guidelines, additional studies are required. The PROSPERO database has this review registered under the number CRD42022333121.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_84_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_84_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本次文献综合评估的目的是根据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)标准和核对表,对测量与脑瘫(CP)相关的儿童姿势的现有工具的方法质量进行评估。在筛选PubMed、ScienceDirect、Web of Science和Scopus数据库中的研究时,我们采用了以下纳入标准来确定其是否符合条件:(1) 对CP患儿的姿势进行临床检查;(2) 在所有粗大运动功能分类系统级别上的年龄为3岁或以上;(3) 描述了姿势评估措施;(4) 对CP患儿的响应性、有效性和可靠性进行了统计;(5) 发表在同行评审的英文期刊上。对有关研究特点、工具或量表特征以及研究结果的数据进行了评估和讨论。在 349,928 项研究中,有 7 项工具被纳入本研究。在 349 928 项研究中,有 7 项工具被纳入本研究,其中 3 项为观察测量,4 项为工具。40% 的研究质量非常好,40% 的研究质量足够好,其余 20% 的研究质量不够好。姿势评估工具测量质量的证据质量水平从非常低到低不等。然而,没有一种工具能够评估 COSMIN 推荐的所有属性。有关用于评估 CP 儿童姿势的工具的测量质量的研究很少且质量不高。根据 COSMIN 指南,需要进行更多的研究。本综述在 PROSPERO 数据库中的注册编号为 CRD42022333121。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical tools to assess posture in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review
The goal of this comprehensive evaluation of the literature is to evaluate the methodological quality of the tools available for measuring a child’s posture in relation to cerebral palsy (CP) in accordance with the consensus-based criteria for selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) criteria and checklist. The following inclusion criteria were applied while screening studies found in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to determine their eligibility: (1) Clinical examinations of the posture of children with CP; (2) age of 3 years or more at all gross motor function classification system levels; (3) posture evaluation measures described; (4) statistics on responsiveness, validity, and reliability for children with CP; and (5) published in peer-reviewed English-language journals. Data on study features, tool or scale characteristics, and study outcomes were evaluated and discussed. The “quality of research” was evaluated using the COSMIN. Seven tools were found and included in this study out of 349,928 studies. Of these, three were observational measurements and four were instruments. The quality of the studies was very good in 40%, adequate in another 40%, and inadequate in the rest of the 20% studies. The evidence’s level of quality for the posture assessment tool’s measurement quality ranged from very low to low. However, none of the tools evaluated every COSMIN-recommended property. There was a lack of evidence about these measures’ responsiveness. Research on the measuring quality of tools used to evaluate posture in children with CP is scarce and of low quality. In accordance with the COSMIN guidelines, additional studies are required. The PROSPERO database has this review registered under the number CRD42022333121.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信