整合哲学教学视角,培养青少年对计算机技术的伦理感知能力

Rotem Landesman, Jean Salac, Jared Ordoña Lim, Amy J. Ko
{"title":"整合哲学教学视角,培养青少年对计算机技术的伦理感知能力","authors":"Rotem Landesman, Jean Salac, Jared Ordoña Lim, Amy J. Ko","doi":"10.1145/3632620.3671106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The growing complexity of the impacts of computing technologies on adolescents’ lives requires them to make similarly complex decisions around technology, fueling a rise in education efforts to look at the ethical implications of these advancements with young people. Though prior computing ethics education efforts integrate ethical perspectives, they have rarely drawn from scholarship on how to teach ethics and philosophy. Objectives: We developed a cross-disciplinary pedagogical intervention that blends ethics-focused computing education efforts like Youth as Philosophers of Technology with tools and best practices from Philosophy for Children (P4C) , an approach for teaching philosophy to young people. We asked the following research questions: In a secondary computing classroom context, (1) How might adolescent students express ethical sensemaking when engaging with our pedagogical intervention? and (2) What opportunities for ethical sensemaking might our pedagogical intervention facilitate? Methods: We implemented our intervention in a summer academic program in the northwest US for 10 secondary students (age 14-18) from low-income families and who would be the first in their families to pursue a post-secondary education (i.e. first-generation). We then conducted a qualitative analysis of student classwork and in-structor reflections using a combination of inductive and deductive coding. Findings: Students expressed their ethical sensemaking by considering multiple perspectives, questioning the status quo, wrestling with dissonance between their principles and actions, and rejecting the good/bad binary. These expressions manifested in three distinct opportunities for ethical sensemaking: when students made connections to their everyday life, engaged in supportive dialogue with their peers, and interacted with instructional scaffolds. Implications: This study indicates the promise of drawing on ped-agogies from philosophy when thinking about ethical sensemaking","PeriodicalId":245617,"journal":{"name":"International Computing Education Research Workshop","volume":"44 2","pages":"502-516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Philosophy Teaching Perspectives to Foster Adolescents' Ethical Sensemaking of Computing Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Rotem Landesman, Jean Salac, Jared Ordoña Lim, Amy J. Ko\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3632620.3671106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The growing complexity of the impacts of computing technologies on adolescents’ lives requires them to make similarly complex decisions around technology, fueling a rise in education efforts to look at the ethical implications of these advancements with young people. Though prior computing ethics education efforts integrate ethical perspectives, they have rarely drawn from scholarship on how to teach ethics and philosophy. Objectives: We developed a cross-disciplinary pedagogical intervention that blends ethics-focused computing education efforts like Youth as Philosophers of Technology with tools and best practices from Philosophy for Children (P4C) , an approach for teaching philosophy to young people. We asked the following research questions: In a secondary computing classroom context, (1) How might adolescent students express ethical sensemaking when engaging with our pedagogical intervention? and (2) What opportunities for ethical sensemaking might our pedagogical intervention facilitate? Methods: We implemented our intervention in a summer academic program in the northwest US for 10 secondary students (age 14-18) from low-income families and who would be the first in their families to pursue a post-secondary education (i.e. first-generation). We then conducted a qualitative analysis of student classwork and in-structor reflections using a combination of inductive and deductive coding. Findings: Students expressed their ethical sensemaking by considering multiple perspectives, questioning the status quo, wrestling with dissonance between their principles and actions, and rejecting the good/bad binary. These expressions manifested in three distinct opportunities for ethical sensemaking: when students made connections to their everyday life, engaged in supportive dialogue with their peers, and interacted with instructional scaffolds. Implications: This study indicates the promise of drawing on ped-agogies from philosophy when thinking about ethical sensemaking\",\"PeriodicalId\":245617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Computing Education Research Workshop\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"502-516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Computing Education Research Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3632620.3671106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Computing Education Research Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3632620.3671106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:计算机技术对青少年生活的影响日益复杂,这就要求他们围绕技术做出同样复杂的决定,从而推动了与青少年一起研究这些进步所带来的伦理影响的教育工作的兴起。虽然之前的计算机伦理教育工作整合了伦理视角,但却很少借鉴有关如何教授伦理和哲学的学术成果。目标:我们开发了一种跨学科的教学干预措施,将 "青年技术哲学家 "等以伦理为重点的计算机教育工作与 "儿童哲学"(P4C)的工具和最佳实践相结合,后者是一种向年轻人传授哲学的方法。我们提出了以下研究问题:在中学计算机课堂背景下,(1) 青少年学生在参与我们的教学干预时可能会如何表达伦理意识? (2) 我们的教学干预可能会促进哪些伦理意识形成的机会?方法:我们在美国西北部的一个暑期学术项目中为 10 名来自低收入家庭的中学生(14-18 岁)实施了我们的干预措施,他们是家庭中第一个接受中学后教育的人(即第一代)。然后,我们采用归纳和演绎编码相结合的方法,对学生的课堂作业和指导教师的反思进行了定性分析。研究结果学生们通过考虑多角度、质疑现状、与原则和行动之间的不协调作斗争以及拒绝好坏二元论来表达他们的道德意识。这些表达方式体现在三种不同的道德意识形成机会中:当学生将日常生活联系起来时,与同伴进行支持性对话时,以及与教学支架互动时。影响:本研究表明,在思考伦理意识的建立时,借鉴哲学中的教学法大有可为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Philosophy Teaching Perspectives to Foster Adolescents' Ethical Sensemaking of Computing Technologies
Background: The growing complexity of the impacts of computing technologies on adolescents’ lives requires them to make similarly complex decisions around technology, fueling a rise in education efforts to look at the ethical implications of these advancements with young people. Though prior computing ethics education efforts integrate ethical perspectives, they have rarely drawn from scholarship on how to teach ethics and philosophy. Objectives: We developed a cross-disciplinary pedagogical intervention that blends ethics-focused computing education efforts like Youth as Philosophers of Technology with tools and best practices from Philosophy for Children (P4C) , an approach for teaching philosophy to young people. We asked the following research questions: In a secondary computing classroom context, (1) How might adolescent students express ethical sensemaking when engaging with our pedagogical intervention? and (2) What opportunities for ethical sensemaking might our pedagogical intervention facilitate? Methods: We implemented our intervention in a summer academic program in the northwest US for 10 secondary students (age 14-18) from low-income families and who would be the first in their families to pursue a post-secondary education (i.e. first-generation). We then conducted a qualitative analysis of student classwork and in-structor reflections using a combination of inductive and deductive coding. Findings: Students expressed their ethical sensemaking by considering multiple perspectives, questioning the status quo, wrestling with dissonance between their principles and actions, and rejecting the good/bad binary. These expressions manifested in three distinct opportunities for ethical sensemaking: when students made connections to their everyday life, engaged in supportive dialogue with their peers, and interacted with instructional scaffolds. Implications: This study indicates the promise of drawing on ped-agogies from philosophy when thinking about ethical sensemaking
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信