Yasin Guler , Ahmet Keskin , Hakan Eskara , Bulent Karslıoglu , Yunus İmren , Suleyman Semih Dedeoglu
{"title":"侧关节外腱鞘切除术提高了使用无结锚进行初级前十字韧带修复的效果:24 个月最短随访。","authors":"Yasin Guler , Ahmet Keskin , Hakan Eskara , Bulent Karslıoglu , Yunus İmren , Suleyman Semih Dedeoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous studies have shown that primary repair of proximal ligament avulsion from the femoral condyle may have reasonable recovery and stability rates after repair. As a result, selecting patients more narrowly and more specifically has been recognized to improve short- and medium-term outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to assess the potential benefits of primary repair for acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with a proximal tear and to evaluate the effect of performing lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) in addition to primary repair on patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was a retrospective cohort study. Thirty-eight patients between the ages of 21 and 40 years who underwent ACL repair surgery within the first 3 weeks after injury due to Sherman type 1 proximal ACL tears were evaluated. Group 1 (<em>n</em> = 18) underwent only primary ACL repair with knotless anchor, while Group 2 (<em>n</em> = 20) had LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary repair. Patients were evaluated using various tests and scoring systems at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in preoperative and postoperative 6- and 12-month visual analog scale (VAS) scores (<em>P</em> >0.05). However, the 24-month VAS score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (<em>P</em> <0.05). The preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (<em>p</em>: 0.004; <em>P</em> <0.05). Group 1 had statistically significantly lower IKDC scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2. Similarly, Group 1 had statistically significantly lower Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) and Tegner–Lysholm scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2 (<em>P</em> <0.05). The occurrence rate of Lachman positivity in the preoperative period was 28.6% in Group 1 and 33.3% in Group 2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study suggests that performing LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary ACL repair may lead to better outcomes in terms of pain relief, knee function, and stability compared with primary ACL repair alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 77-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral extrarticular tenodesis enhances outcomes in primary anterior cruciate ligament repair with knotless anchor: 24-Month minimum follow up\",\"authors\":\"Yasin Guler , Ahmet Keskin , Hakan Eskara , Bulent Karslıoglu , Yunus İmren , Suleyman Semih Dedeoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous studies have shown that primary repair of proximal ligament avulsion from the femoral condyle may have reasonable recovery and stability rates after repair. As a result, selecting patients more narrowly and more specifically has been recognized to improve short- and medium-term outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to assess the potential benefits of primary repair for acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with a proximal tear and to evaluate the effect of performing lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) in addition to primary repair on patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was a retrospective cohort study. Thirty-eight patients between the ages of 21 and 40 years who underwent ACL repair surgery within the first 3 weeks after injury due to Sherman type 1 proximal ACL tears were evaluated. Group 1 (<em>n</em> = 18) underwent only primary ACL repair with knotless anchor, while Group 2 (<em>n</em> = 20) had LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary repair. Patients were evaluated using various tests and scoring systems at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in preoperative and postoperative 6- and 12-month visual analog scale (VAS) scores (<em>P</em> >0.05). However, the 24-month VAS score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (<em>P</em> <0.05). The preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (<em>p</em>: 0.004; <em>P</em> <0.05). Group 1 had statistically significantly lower IKDC scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2. Similarly, Group 1 had statistically significantly lower Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) and Tegner–Lysholm scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2 (<em>P</em> <0.05). The occurrence rate of Lachman positivity in the preoperative period was 28.6% in Group 1 and 33.3% in Group 2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study suggests that performing LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary ACL repair may lead to better outcomes in terms of pain relief, knee function, and stability compared with primary ACL repair alone.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 77-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:以往的研究表明,股骨髁近端韧带撕脱的初次修复术后可能会有合理的恢复率和稳定率。目的:本研究旨在评估近端撕裂的急性前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂进行初次修复的潜在益处,并评估在初次修复的基础上进行外侧关节外韧带切开术(LET)对患者预后的影响:研究设计:回顾性队列研究:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究。研究评估了38名年龄在21至40岁之间的患者,他们都是因舍曼1型前交叉韧带近端撕裂而在伤后3周内接受了前交叉韧带修复手术。第一组(18 人)仅接受了无结锚前交叉韧带初次修复手术,而第二组(20 人)则在初次修复手术的基础上接受了髂胫束自体移植前交叉韧带修复手术。患者在术后6、12和24个月时接受了各种测试和评分系统的评估:两组患者术前和术后 6 个月和 12 个月的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。然而,第 1 组 24 个月的 VAS 评分在统计学上明显高于第 2 组(P 结论:第 1 组的 VAS 评分明显高于第 2 组:我们的研究表明,与单纯的前交叉韧带初次修复相比,在前交叉韧带初次修复的基础上进行髂胫束自体移植物 LET 可在疼痛缓解、膝关节功能和稳定性方面取得更好的疗效。
Lateral extrarticular tenodesis enhances outcomes in primary anterior cruciate ligament repair with knotless anchor: 24-Month minimum follow up
Background
Previous studies have shown that primary repair of proximal ligament avulsion from the femoral condyle may have reasonable recovery and stability rates after repair. As a result, selecting patients more narrowly and more specifically has been recognized to improve short- and medium-term outcomes.
Purpose
This study aimed to assess the potential benefits of primary repair for acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with a proximal tear and to evaluate the effect of performing lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) in addition to primary repair on patient outcomes.
Study design
Retrospective cohort study.
Methods
This study was a retrospective cohort study. Thirty-eight patients between the ages of 21 and 40 years who underwent ACL repair surgery within the first 3 weeks after injury due to Sherman type 1 proximal ACL tears were evaluated. Group 1 (n = 18) underwent only primary ACL repair with knotless anchor, while Group 2 (n = 20) had LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary repair. Patients were evaluated using various tests and scoring systems at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
Results
There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in preoperative and postoperative 6- and 12-month visual analog scale (VAS) scores (P >0.05). However, the 24-month VAS score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (P <0.05). The preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (p: 0.004; P <0.05). Group 1 had statistically significantly lower IKDC scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2. Similarly, Group 1 had statistically significantly lower Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) and Tegner–Lysholm scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2 (P <0.05). The occurrence rate of Lachman positivity in the preoperative period was 28.6% in Group 1 and 33.3% in Group 2.
Conclusion
Our study suggests that performing LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary ACL repair may lead to better outcomes in terms of pain relief, knee function, and stability compared with primary ACL repair alone.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.