肝脏立体定向体外放射治疗中预测治疗前质量保证的伽马指数建模。

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_176_23
Rose Kamal, Deepak Thaper, Gaganpreet Singh, Shambhavi Sharma, Navjeet, Arun Singh Oinam, Vivek Kumar
{"title":"肝脏立体定向体外放射治疗中预测治疗前质量保证的伽马指数建模。","authors":"Rose Kamal, Deepak Thaper, Gaganpreet Singh, Shambhavi Sharma, Navjeet, Arun Singh Oinam, Vivek Kumar","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_176_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model to evaluate pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) based on treatment planning parameters for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively selected 180 cases of liver SBRT treated using the volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. Numerous parameters defining the plan complexity were calculated from the DICOM-RP (Radiotherapy Plan) file using an in-house program developed in MATLAB. Patient-specific QA was performed with global gamma evaluation criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm in a relative mode using the Octavius two-dimensional detector array. Various statistical tests and multivariate predictive models were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The leaf speed (MI<sub>LS</sub>) and planning target volume size showed the highest correlation with the gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Degree of modulation (DoM), MCS<sub>SPORT</sub>, leaf speed (MI<sub>LS</sub>), and gantry speed (MI<sub>GS</sub>) were predictors of global gamma pass rate (GPR) for 2%/2 mm (G22), whereas DoM, MCS<sub>SPORT</sub>, leaf speed (MI<sub>LS</sub>) and robust decision making were predictors of the global GPR criterion of 3%/3 mm (G33). The variance inflation factor values of all predictors were <2, indicating that the data were not associated with each other. For the G22 prediction, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 75.0% and 75.0%, respectively, whereas, for G33 prediction, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 74.9% and 85.7%%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The model was potentially beneficial as an easy alternative to pretreatment QA in predicting the uncertainty in plan deliverability at the planning stage and could help reduce resources in busy clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 2","pages":"232-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling of Gamma Index for Prediction of Pretreatment Quality Assurance in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of the Liver.\",\"authors\":\"Rose Kamal, Deepak Thaper, Gaganpreet Singh, Shambhavi Sharma, Navjeet, Arun Singh Oinam, Vivek Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_176_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model to evaluate pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) based on treatment planning parameters for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively selected 180 cases of liver SBRT treated using the volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. Numerous parameters defining the plan complexity were calculated from the DICOM-RP (Radiotherapy Plan) file using an in-house program developed in MATLAB. Patient-specific QA was performed with global gamma evaluation criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm in a relative mode using the Octavius two-dimensional detector array. Various statistical tests and multivariate predictive models were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The leaf speed (MI<sub>LS</sub>) and planning target volume size showed the highest correlation with the gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Degree of modulation (DoM), MCS<sub>SPORT</sub>, leaf speed (MI<sub>LS</sub>), and gantry speed (MI<sub>GS</sub>) were predictors of global gamma pass rate (GPR) for 2%/2 mm (G22), whereas DoM, MCS<sub>SPORT</sub>, leaf speed (MI<sub>LS</sub>) and robust decision making were predictors of the global GPR criterion of 3%/3 mm (G33). The variance inflation factor values of all predictors were <2, indicating that the data were not associated with each other. For the G22 prediction, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 75.0% and 75.0%, respectively, whereas, for G33 prediction, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 74.9% and 85.7%%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The model was potentially beneficial as an easy alternative to pretreatment QA in predicting the uncertainty in plan deliverability at the planning stage and could help reduce resources in busy clinics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"232-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309143/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_176_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_176_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是根据肝癌立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)的治疗计划参数建立一个预测模型,以评估治疗前患者特异性质量保证(QA):我们回顾性地选择了180例使用容积调制弧治疗技术进行肝脏SBRT治疗的病例。使用 MATLAB 开发的内部程序从 DICOM-RP(放疗计划)文件中计算出定义计划复杂性的众多参数。在相对模式下,使用 Octavius 二维探测器阵列按照 2%/2 mm 和 3%/3 mm 的全局伽马评估标准进行了患者特定质量保证。对各种统计检验和多变量预测模型进行了评估:结果:叶片速度(MILS)和规划目标体积大小与伽马标准 2%/2 毫米和 3%/3 毫米的相关性最高(P < 0.05)。调制度(DoM)、MCSSPORT、叶片速度(MILS)和龙门速度(MIGS)是预测 2%/2 毫米(G22)全局伽马通过率(GPR)的指标,而调制度(DoM)、MCSSPORT、叶片速度(MILS)和稳健决策是预测 3%/3 毫米(G33)全局伽马通过率标准的指标。所有预测因子的方差膨胀因子值均为结论:该模型可作为预处理质量保证的简易替代方案,在计划阶段预测计划可交付性的不确定性,有助于减少繁忙诊所的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling of Gamma Index for Prediction of Pretreatment Quality Assurance in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of the Liver.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a predictive model to evaluate pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance (QA) based on treatment planning parameters for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver carcinoma.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively selected 180 cases of liver SBRT treated using the volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. Numerous parameters defining the plan complexity were calculated from the DICOM-RP (Radiotherapy Plan) file using an in-house program developed in MATLAB. Patient-specific QA was performed with global gamma evaluation criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm in a relative mode using the Octavius two-dimensional detector array. Various statistical tests and multivariate predictive models were evaluated.

Results: The leaf speed (MILS) and planning target volume size showed the highest correlation with the gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm (P < 0.05). Degree of modulation (DoM), MCSSPORT, leaf speed (MILS), and gantry speed (MIGS) were predictors of global gamma pass rate (GPR) for 2%/2 mm (G22), whereas DoM, MCSSPORT, leaf speed (MILS) and robust decision making were predictors of the global GPR criterion of 3%/3 mm (G33). The variance inflation factor values of all predictors were <2, indicating that the data were not associated with each other. For the G22 prediction, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 75.0% and 75.0%, respectively, whereas, for G33 prediction, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 74.9% and 85.7%%, respectively.

Conclusions: The model was potentially beneficial as an easy alternative to pretreatment QA in predicting the uncertainty in plan deliverability at the planning stage and could help reduce resources in busy clinics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信