研究用于容积调制弧形放疗计划的 Mobius3D 剂量计算的剂量叶间隙校正因子

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_11_24
Thitipong Sawapabmongkon, Pimolpun Changkaew, Chanon Puttanawarut, Puangpen Tangboonduangjit, Suphalak Khachonkham
{"title":"研究用于容积调制弧形放疗计划的 Mobius3D 剂量计算的剂量叶间隙校正因子","authors":"Thitipong Sawapabmongkon, Pimolpun Changkaew, Chanon Puttanawarut, Puangpen Tangboonduangjit, Suphalak Khachonkham","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_11_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) is a parameter for correcting radiation transmission through the round leaf end of multileaf collimators. The purpose of this study was to determine and investigate the optimal DLG correction factor for 6 MV volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) plan dose calculations in Mobius3D.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventeen VMAT plans were selected for the DLG correction factor optimization process. The optimal DLG correction factor was defined as the minimum difference between the measured dose and the Mobius3D-calculated dose on the Mobius Verification Phantom™ with different DLG correction factors. Subsequently, the optimal DLG correction factor was applied for Mobius3D dose calculation, and accuracy was assessed by comparing the measured and calculated doses. For verification and validation, the 17 previous plans and 10 newly selected plans underwent Mobius3D calculations with the optimal DLG correction factor, and gamma analysis was performed to compare them to the treatment planning system (TPS). Gamma analysis was also performed between the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and the TPS for cross-comparison between systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DLG correction factor was optimized to -1.252, which reduced the average percentage differences between measured and Mobius3D-calculated doses from 2.23% ±1.21% to 0.03% ±1.82%. The cross-comparison between Mobius3D/TPS and EPID/TPS revealed a similar trend in gamma passing rate (>95%) in both the verification and validation plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DLG correction factor strongly influences the accuracy of Mobius3D-calculated doses. Applying the optimal DLG correction factor can increase dose agreement and gamma passing rate between calculation and delivered doses of VMAT plans, which emphasizes the importance of optimizing this factor during the commissioning process.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 2","pages":"261-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Dosimetric Leaf Gap Correction Factor of Mobius3D Dose Calculation for Volumetric-modulated Arc Radiotherapy Plans.\",\"authors\":\"Thitipong Sawapabmongkon, Pimolpun Changkaew, Chanon Puttanawarut, Puangpen Tangboonduangjit, Suphalak Khachonkham\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_11_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) is a parameter for correcting radiation transmission through the round leaf end of multileaf collimators. The purpose of this study was to determine and investigate the optimal DLG correction factor for 6 MV volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) plan dose calculations in Mobius3D.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventeen VMAT plans were selected for the DLG correction factor optimization process. The optimal DLG correction factor was defined as the minimum difference between the measured dose and the Mobius3D-calculated dose on the Mobius Verification Phantom™ with different DLG correction factors. Subsequently, the optimal DLG correction factor was applied for Mobius3D dose calculation, and accuracy was assessed by comparing the measured and calculated doses. For verification and validation, the 17 previous plans and 10 newly selected plans underwent Mobius3D calculations with the optimal DLG correction factor, and gamma analysis was performed to compare them to the treatment planning system (TPS). Gamma analysis was also performed between the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and the TPS for cross-comparison between systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DLG correction factor was optimized to -1.252, which reduced the average percentage differences between measured and Mobius3D-calculated doses from 2.23% ±1.21% to 0.03% ±1.82%. The cross-comparison between Mobius3D/TPS and EPID/TPS revealed a similar trend in gamma passing rate (>95%) in both the verification and validation plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DLG correction factor strongly influences the accuracy of Mobius3D-calculated doses. Applying the optimal DLG correction factor can increase dose agreement and gamma passing rate between calculation and delivered doses of VMAT plans, which emphasizes the importance of optimizing this factor during the commissioning process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"261-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_11_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_11_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:剂量测定叶间隙(DLG)是校正通过多叶准直器圆叶端辐射传输的参数。本研究的目的是确定和研究在 Mobius3D 中计算 6 MV 容积调制弧线放疗(VMAT)计划剂量时的最佳 DLG 修正系数:选取 17 个 VMAT 计划进行 DLG 修正系数优化。最佳 DLG 校正因子被定义为在 Mobius Verification Phantom™ 上使用不同 DLG 校正因子测量的剂量与 Mobius3D 计算的剂量之间的最小差值。随后,将最佳 DLG 校正因子用于 Mobius3D 剂量计算,并通过比较测量剂量和计算剂量来评估准确性。为了进行验证和确认,17 个先前的计划和 10 个新选择的计划使用最佳 DLG 校正因子进行了 Mobius3D 计算,并进行了伽马分析,以便与治疗计划系统(TPS)进行比较。此外,还在电子门户成像设备(EPID)和 TPS 之间进行了伽马分析,以实现系统间的交叉比较:结果:DLG校正因子优化为-1.252,从而将测量剂量与Mobius3D计算剂量之间的平均百分比差异从2.23% ±1.21%降至0.03% ±1.82%。Mobius3D/TPS与EPID/TPS的交叉比较显示,在验证和确认计划中,伽马通过率(>95%)的趋势相似:结论:DLG校正因子对Mobius3D计算剂量的准确性影响很大。应用最佳的DLG校正因子可以提高VMAT计划的计算剂量和交付剂量之间的剂量一致性和伽马通过率,这强调了在调试过程中优化该因子的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the Dosimetric Leaf Gap Correction Factor of Mobius3D Dose Calculation for Volumetric-modulated Arc Radiotherapy Plans.

Aims: The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) is a parameter for correcting radiation transmission through the round leaf end of multileaf collimators. The purpose of this study was to determine and investigate the optimal DLG correction factor for 6 MV volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) plan dose calculations in Mobius3D.

Materials and methods: Seventeen VMAT plans were selected for the DLG correction factor optimization process. The optimal DLG correction factor was defined as the minimum difference between the measured dose and the Mobius3D-calculated dose on the Mobius Verification Phantom™ with different DLG correction factors. Subsequently, the optimal DLG correction factor was applied for Mobius3D dose calculation, and accuracy was assessed by comparing the measured and calculated doses. For verification and validation, the 17 previous plans and 10 newly selected plans underwent Mobius3D calculations with the optimal DLG correction factor, and gamma analysis was performed to compare them to the treatment planning system (TPS). Gamma analysis was also performed between the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and the TPS for cross-comparison between systems.

Results: The DLG correction factor was optimized to -1.252, which reduced the average percentage differences between measured and Mobius3D-calculated doses from 2.23% ±1.21% to 0.03% ±1.82%. The cross-comparison between Mobius3D/TPS and EPID/TPS revealed a similar trend in gamma passing rate (>95%) in both the verification and validation plans.

Conclusion: The DLG correction factor strongly influences the accuracy of Mobius3D-calculated doses. Applying the optimal DLG correction factor can increase dose agreement and gamma passing rate between calculation and delivered doses of VMAT plans, which emphasizes the importance of optimizing this factor during the commissioning process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信