言语听觉幻觉在影响和回顾性预测早期精神病患者身体伤害发生率中的作用》(The Role of Verbal Auditory Hallucinations in Influencing and Retrospectively Predicting Physical Harm Prevalence in Early Psychosis)。

Q2 Medicine
Cassie M Hazell, Sophia Hasapopoulos, Jennifer McGowan, Roman Hamza, Zareena Ahmed, Ben Gaughan, Monica Huerga Malillos, Amber Gill, Amber Nomani, Emily Hickson, Anjeza Koruni, Faaisa Islam, Jonathan Souray, David Raune
{"title":"言语听觉幻觉在影响和回顾性预测早期精神病患者身体伤害发生率中的作用》(The Role of Verbal Auditory Hallucinations in Influencing and Retrospectively Predicting Physical Harm Prevalence in Early Psychosis)。","authors":"Cassie M Hazell, Sophia Hasapopoulos, Jennifer McGowan, Roman Hamza, Zareena Ahmed, Ben Gaughan, Monica Huerga Malillos, Amber Gill, Amber Nomani, Emily Hickson, Anjeza Koruni, Faaisa Islam, Jonathan Souray, David Raune","doi":"10.2174/0117450179286452240520070533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has established a relationship between psychosis and physical harm in the early course of psychosis. However, little is known about the relationship between specific psychosis symptoms, such as hearing voices, and physical harm.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the prevalence and typology of physical harm related to hearing voices, as well as what aspects of the voice-hearing experience retrospectively predicted incidents of harm within an Early Intervention in Psychosis Service (EIPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quality improvement project in a single EIPS. We reviewed case notes of patients and extracted information on the cognitive-phenomenological features of the voices patients heard, as well as any incidents of physical harm that were causally linked to these voices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that 32.2% of EI patients had an actual incident of physical harm in their case notes that was causally linked to hearing voices. The most common type of physical harm was neglect. In terms of cognitive phenomenological binary correlations that retrospectively predicted physical harm in the case notes, patients were 20 and 7 times more likely to have harmed themselves if they heard self-harm commands (<i>i.e</i>., directions to harm themselves physically) and perceived the voice as omnipotent, respectively. Patients were 6 times more likely to have harmed someone else if they heard violent commands.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Verbal auditory hallucinations commonly influence physical harm in the early course of psychosis. Hearing commands and/or believing the voice to be omnipotent are strong retrospective-correlative predictors that may aid in the assessment and therapeutic intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11311800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Verbal Auditory Hallucinations in Influencing and Retrospectively Predicting Physical Harm Prevalence in Early Psychosis.\",\"authors\":\"Cassie M Hazell, Sophia Hasapopoulos, Jennifer McGowan, Roman Hamza, Zareena Ahmed, Ben Gaughan, Monica Huerga Malillos, Amber Gill, Amber Nomani, Emily Hickson, Anjeza Koruni, Faaisa Islam, Jonathan Souray, David Raune\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0117450179286452240520070533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has established a relationship between psychosis and physical harm in the early course of psychosis. However, little is known about the relationship between specific psychosis symptoms, such as hearing voices, and physical harm.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the prevalence and typology of physical harm related to hearing voices, as well as what aspects of the voice-hearing experience retrospectively predicted incidents of harm within an Early Intervention in Psychosis Service (EIPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quality improvement project in a single EIPS. We reviewed case notes of patients and extracted information on the cognitive-phenomenological features of the voices patients heard, as well as any incidents of physical harm that were causally linked to these voices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that 32.2% of EI patients had an actual incident of physical harm in their case notes that was causally linked to hearing voices. The most common type of physical harm was neglect. In terms of cognitive phenomenological binary correlations that retrospectively predicted physical harm in the case notes, patients were 20 and 7 times more likely to have harmed themselves if they heard self-harm commands (<i>i.e</i>., directions to harm themselves physically) and perceived the voice as omnipotent, respectively. Patients were 6 times more likely to have harmed someone else if they heard violent commands.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Verbal auditory hallucinations commonly influence physical harm in the early course of psychosis. Hearing commands and/or believing the voice to be omnipotent are strong retrospective-correlative predictors that may aid in the assessment and therapeutic intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11311800/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0117450179286452240520070533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0117450179286452240520070533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究证实,在精神病的早期病程中,精神病与身体伤害之间存在关系。然而,人们对特定精神病症状(如幻听)与身体伤害之间的关系知之甚少:本研究旨在确定与幻听有关的身体伤害的发生率和类型,以及在精神病早期干预服务(EIPS)中,幻听体验的哪些方面可追溯预测伤害事件:我们在一家精神病早期干预服务机构开展了一项质量改进项目。我们查阅了患者的病例记录,并提取了患者所听到的声音的认知现象学特征以及与这些声音有因果关系的任何身体伤害事件的相关信息:结果发现,32.2%的听力障碍患者的病例记录中存在与幻听有因果关系的实际身体伤害事件。最常见的身体伤害类型是忽视。就病例记录中可追溯预测身体伤害的认知现象学二元相关性而言,如果患者听到自残指令(即伤害自己身体的指令)和认为声音是万能的,那么他们伤害自己的可能性分别高出 20 倍和 7 倍。如果患者听到的是暴力指令,那么他们伤害他人的可能性要高出6倍:结论:言语幻听通常会在精神病早期对身体造成伤害。听到命令和/或认为声音是万能的是强有力的回顾性相关预测因素,可能有助于评估和治疗干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Verbal Auditory Hallucinations in Influencing and Retrospectively Predicting Physical Harm Prevalence in Early Psychosis.

Background: Research has established a relationship between psychosis and physical harm in the early course of psychosis. However, little is known about the relationship between specific psychosis symptoms, such as hearing voices, and physical harm.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and typology of physical harm related to hearing voices, as well as what aspects of the voice-hearing experience retrospectively predicted incidents of harm within an Early Intervention in Psychosis Service (EIPS).

Methods: We conducted a quality improvement project in a single EIPS. We reviewed case notes of patients and extracted information on the cognitive-phenomenological features of the voices patients heard, as well as any incidents of physical harm that were causally linked to these voices.

Results: It was found that 32.2% of EI patients had an actual incident of physical harm in their case notes that was causally linked to hearing voices. The most common type of physical harm was neglect. In terms of cognitive phenomenological binary correlations that retrospectively predicted physical harm in the case notes, patients were 20 and 7 times more likely to have harmed themselves if they heard self-harm commands (i.e., directions to harm themselves physically) and perceived the voice as omnipotent, respectively. Patients were 6 times more likely to have harmed someone else if they heard violent commands.

Conclusion: Verbal auditory hallucinations commonly influence physical harm in the early course of psychosis. Hearing commands and/or believing the voice to be omnipotent are strong retrospective-correlative predictors that may aid in the assessment and therapeutic intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信