慢性泪囊炎:细菌学和抗菌药敏感性模式透视。

Q3 Medicine
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.4103/ojo.ojo_116_23
Vibhuti Sethi, Himanshu Kumar Mittal, Rajeev Tuli
{"title":"慢性泪囊炎:细菌学和抗菌药敏感性模式透视。","authors":"Vibhuti Sethi, Himanshu Kumar Mittal, Rajeev Tuli","doi":"10.4103/ojo.ojo_116_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Adequate management of chronic dacryocystitis is an essential prerequisite before any intraocular surgery owing to a grave risk of endophthalmitis. The knowledge of bacteriology of chronic dacryocystitis would accentuate the choice of effective antimicrobial agents and thus help in reducing the irrational use of antimicrobial agents and subsequent development of drug resistance.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to identify the causative bacterial flora and study the antimicrobial sensitivity and resistance pattern in cases of chronic dacryocystitis.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional observational study.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Conjunctival swabs were obtained from both eyes from 102 patients with clinical evidence of chronic dacryocystitis. Specimens for microbiological analysis were obtained, either from the conjunctival cul-de-sac and everted puncta by applying pressure over the lacrimal sac area or from the refluxing material after irrigating the lacrimal sac with sterile saline. The specimens were sent for culture and sensitivity in the department of microbiology. Ethical approvals were duly obtained.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Percentage assessment was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cultures showed the presence of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in 50% of bacterial isolates obtained from the involved eyes, followed by coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus</i> in 11.53% of isolates and <i>Enterococcus</i> also in 11.53% of isolates. It was observed that cefoxitin was the most sensitive antibiotic against Gram-positive organisms, followed by vancomycin and clindamycin, whereas maximum resistance was seen for penicillin and ofloxacin. For Gram-negative organisms, imipenem was found to be most sensitive, followed by gentamicin and co-amoxiclav, whereas maximum resistance was seen for ciprofloxacin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was concluded that Gram-positive bacteria predominantly <i>S.</i> <i>aureus</i> was the most commonly isolated bacteria in cases of chronic dacryocystitis as compared to Gram-negative bacteria and cefoxitin was found to be the overall most effective antibiotic for Gram-positive bacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":19461,"journal":{"name":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"17 2","pages":"192-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic dacryocystitis: An insight into bacteriology and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern.\",\"authors\":\"Vibhuti Sethi, Himanshu Kumar Mittal, Rajeev Tuli\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ojo.ojo_116_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Adequate management of chronic dacryocystitis is an essential prerequisite before any intraocular surgery owing to a grave risk of endophthalmitis. The knowledge of bacteriology of chronic dacryocystitis would accentuate the choice of effective antimicrobial agents and thus help in reducing the irrational use of antimicrobial agents and subsequent development of drug resistance.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to identify the causative bacterial flora and study the antimicrobial sensitivity and resistance pattern in cases of chronic dacryocystitis.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional observational study.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Conjunctival swabs were obtained from both eyes from 102 patients with clinical evidence of chronic dacryocystitis. Specimens for microbiological analysis were obtained, either from the conjunctival cul-de-sac and everted puncta by applying pressure over the lacrimal sac area or from the refluxing material after irrigating the lacrimal sac with sterile saline. The specimens were sent for culture and sensitivity in the department of microbiology. Ethical approvals were duly obtained.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Percentage assessment was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cultures showed the presence of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in 50% of bacterial isolates obtained from the involved eyes, followed by coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus</i> in 11.53% of isolates and <i>Enterococcus</i> also in 11.53% of isolates. It was observed that cefoxitin was the most sensitive antibiotic against Gram-positive organisms, followed by vancomycin and clindamycin, whereas maximum resistance was seen for penicillin and ofloxacin. For Gram-negative organisms, imipenem was found to be most sensitive, followed by gentamicin and co-amoxiclav, whereas maximum resistance was seen for ciprofloxacin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was concluded that Gram-positive bacteria predominantly <i>S.</i> <i>aureus</i> was the most commonly isolated bacteria in cases of chronic dacryocystitis as compared to Gram-negative bacteria and cefoxitin was found to be the overall most effective antibiotic for Gram-positive bacteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"192-197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309557/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_116_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oman Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.ojo_116_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于眼内炎的风险很高,因此在进行任何眼内手术之前,对慢性泪囊炎进行适当处理是必不可少的先决条件。对慢性泪囊炎细菌学的了解将有助于选择有效的抗菌药物,从而减少抗菌药物的不合理使用和耐药性的产生。目的:我们旨在确定慢性泪囊炎病例中的致病菌群,并研究其对抗菌药物的敏感性和耐药性模式:这是一项横断面观察性研究:从 102 名有慢性泪囊炎临床证据的患者的双眼中采集结膜拭子。用于微生物分析的标本是通过在泪囊区域加压从结膜窦和外翻的穿刺点获取的,或者是在用无菌生理盐水冲洗泪囊后从反流物中获取的。标本送至微生物学部门进行培养和药敏试验。已正式获得伦理批准:统计分析采用百分比评估:结果:培养结果显示,从患眼分离出的细菌中,50%为金黄色葡萄球菌,11.53%为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,11.53%为肠球菌。据观察,头孢西丁是对革兰氏阳性菌最敏感的抗生素,其次是万古霉素和林可霉素,而青霉素和氧氟沙星的耐药性最高。对于革兰氏阴性菌,亚胺培南最敏感,其次是庆大霉素和联合阿莫西林,而耐药性最强的是环丙沙星:结论:与革兰氏阴性菌相比,以金葡菌为主的革兰氏阳性菌是慢性泪囊炎病例中最常分离到的细菌,而头孢西丁是对革兰氏阳性菌最有效的抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chronic dacryocystitis: An insight into bacteriology and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern.

Context: Adequate management of chronic dacryocystitis is an essential prerequisite before any intraocular surgery owing to a grave risk of endophthalmitis. The knowledge of bacteriology of chronic dacryocystitis would accentuate the choice of effective antimicrobial agents and thus help in reducing the irrational use of antimicrobial agents and subsequent development of drug resistance.

Aims: We aimed to identify the causative bacterial flora and study the antimicrobial sensitivity and resistance pattern in cases of chronic dacryocystitis.

Settings and design: This was a cross-sectional observational study.

Subjects and methods: Conjunctival swabs were obtained from both eyes from 102 patients with clinical evidence of chronic dacryocystitis. Specimens for microbiological analysis were obtained, either from the conjunctival cul-de-sac and everted puncta by applying pressure over the lacrimal sac area or from the refluxing material after irrigating the lacrimal sac with sterile saline. The specimens were sent for culture and sensitivity in the department of microbiology. Ethical approvals were duly obtained.

Statistical analysis used: Percentage assessment was used for statistical analysis.

Results: The cultures showed the presence of Staphylococcus aureus in 50% of bacterial isolates obtained from the involved eyes, followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 11.53% of isolates and Enterococcus also in 11.53% of isolates. It was observed that cefoxitin was the most sensitive antibiotic against Gram-positive organisms, followed by vancomycin and clindamycin, whereas maximum resistance was seen for penicillin and ofloxacin. For Gram-negative organisms, imipenem was found to be most sensitive, followed by gentamicin and co-amoxiclav, whereas maximum resistance was seen for ciprofloxacin.

Conclusions: It was concluded that Gram-positive bacteria predominantly S. aureus was the most commonly isolated bacteria in cases of chronic dacryocystitis as compared to Gram-negative bacteria and cefoxitin was found to be the overall most effective antibiotic for Gram-positive bacteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: To provide a platform for scientific expression of the Oman Ophthalmic Society and the international Ophthalmic community and to provide opportunities for free exchange of ideas and information. To serve as a valuable resource for ophthalmologists, eye-care providers including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信