动脉钙化对肾移植患者心血管和肾脏预后的影响

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-16 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1159/000538929
Joohyung Ha, Jong Cheol Jeong, Jung-Hwa Ryu, Myung-Gyu Kim, Kyu Ha Huh, Kyo Won Lee, Hee-Yeon Jung, Kyung Pyo Kang, Han Ro, Seungyeup Han, Beom Seok Kim, Jaeseok Yang
{"title":"动脉钙化对肾移植患者心血管和肾脏预后的影响","authors":"Joohyung Ha, Jong Cheol Jeong, Jung-Hwa Ryu, Myung-Gyu Kim, Kyu Ha Huh, Kyo Won Lee, Hee-Yeon Jung, Kyung Pyo Kang, Han Ro, Seungyeup Han, Beom Seok Kim, Jaeseok Yang","doi":"10.1159/000538929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coronary artery calcification score (CACS) and abdominal aortic calcification score (AACS) are both well-established markers of vascular stiffness, and previous studies have shown that a higher CACS is a risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. However, the impact of pretransplant CACS and AACS on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in kidney transplant patients has not been established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 944 kidney transplant recipients from the KoreaN cohort study for Outcome in patients With Kidney Transplantation (KNOW-KT) cohort and categorized them into three groups (low, medium, and high) according to baseline CACS (0, 0 < and ≤100, >100) and AACS (0, 1-4, >4). The low (0), medium (0 < and ≤ 100), and high (>100) CACS groups each consisted of 462, 213, and 225 patients, respectively. Similarly, the low (0), medium (1-4), and high (>4) AACS groups included 638, 159, and 147 patients, respectively. The primary outcome was the occurrence of cardiovascular events. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and composite kidney outcomes, which comprised of >50% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and graft loss. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the association between baseline CACS/AACS and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The high CACS group (<i>N</i> = 462) faced a significantly higher risk for cardiovascular outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 5.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01-17.7) and all-cause mortality (aHR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.27-5.92) compared to the low CACS group (<i>N</i> = 225). Similarly, the high AACS group (<i>N</i> = 638) had an elevated risk for cardiovascular outcomes (aHR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.16-4.88). Furthermore, the addition of CACS to prediction models improved prediction indices for cardiovascular outcomes. However, the risk of renal outcomes did not differ among CACS or AACS groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pretransplant arterial calcification, characterized by high CACS or AACS, is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in kidney transplant patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Arterial Calcification on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Joohyung Ha, Jong Cheol Jeong, Jung-Hwa Ryu, Myung-Gyu Kim, Kyu Ha Huh, Kyo Won Lee, Hee-Yeon Jung, Kyung Pyo Kang, Han Ro, Seungyeup Han, Beom Seok Kim, Jaeseok Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coronary artery calcification score (CACS) and abdominal aortic calcification score (AACS) are both well-established markers of vascular stiffness, and previous studies have shown that a higher CACS is a risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. However, the impact of pretransplant CACS and AACS on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in kidney transplant patients has not been established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 944 kidney transplant recipients from the KoreaN cohort study for Outcome in patients With Kidney Transplantation (KNOW-KT) cohort and categorized them into three groups (low, medium, and high) according to baseline CACS (0, 0 < and ≤100, >100) and AACS (0, 1-4, >4). The low (0), medium (0 < and ≤ 100), and high (>100) CACS groups each consisted of 462, 213, and 225 patients, respectively. Similarly, the low (0), medium (1-4), and high (>4) AACS groups included 638, 159, and 147 patients, respectively. The primary outcome was the occurrence of cardiovascular events. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and composite kidney outcomes, which comprised of >50% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and graft loss. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the association between baseline CACS/AACS and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The high CACS group (<i>N</i> = 462) faced a significantly higher risk for cardiovascular outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 5.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01-17.7) and all-cause mortality (aHR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.27-5.92) compared to the low CACS group (<i>N</i> = 225). Similarly, the high AACS group (<i>N</i> = 638) had an elevated risk for cardiovascular outcomes (aHR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.16-4.88). Furthermore, the addition of CACS to prediction models improved prediction indices for cardiovascular outcomes. However, the risk of renal outcomes did not differ among CACS or AACS groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pretransplant arterial calcification, characterized by high CACS or AACS, is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in kidney transplant patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309755/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538929\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538929","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言冠状动脉钙化评分(CACS)和腹主动脉钙化评分(AACS)都是公认的血管僵化标志物,以往的研究表明,较高的CACS是慢性肾脏病(CKD)进展的风险因素。然而,移植前 CACS 和 AACS 对肾移植患者心血管和肾脏预后的影响尚未确定:我们纳入了韩国肾移植患者结局队列研究(KoreaN cohort study for Outcome in patients with Kidney Transplantation,KNOW-KT)队列中的 944 名肾移植受者,并根据基线 CACS(0,0 < 和≤100,>100)和 AACS(0,1-4,>4)将他们分为三组(低、中、高)。低(0)、中(0<和≤100)和高(>100)CACS 组分别有 462、213 和 225 名患者。同样,低(0)、中(1-4)和高(>4)AACS 组分别有 638、159 和 147 名患者。主要结果是心血管事件的发生率。次要结局是全因死亡率和综合肾脏结局,包括估计肾小球滤过率下降>50%和移植物损失。Cox回归分析用于研究基线CACS/AACS与结果之间的关系:结果:与低 CACS 组(N = 225)相比,高 CACS 组(N = 462)的心血管后果风险(调整后危险比 [aHR],5.97;95% 置信区间 [CI],2.01-17.7)和全因死亡率(aHR,2.74;95% CI,1.27-5.92)明显更高。同样,高 AACS 组(N = 638)的心血管后果风险也较高(aHR,2.38;95% CI,1.16-4.88)。此外,在预测模型中加入 CACS 可改善心血管预后的预测指数。然而,CACS组和AACS组的肾脏预后风险并无差别:结论:以高 CACS 或 AACS 为特征的移植前动脉钙化是肾移植患者心血管预后和死亡率的独立风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Arterial Calcification on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Patients.

Introduction: Coronary artery calcification score (CACS) and abdominal aortic calcification score (AACS) are both well-established markers of vascular stiffness, and previous studies have shown that a higher CACS is a risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. However, the impact of pretransplant CACS and AACS on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in kidney transplant patients has not been established.

Methods: We included 944 kidney transplant recipients from the KoreaN cohort study for Outcome in patients With Kidney Transplantation (KNOW-KT) cohort and categorized them into three groups (low, medium, and high) according to baseline CACS (0, 0 < and ≤100, >100) and AACS (0, 1-4, >4). The low (0), medium (0 < and ≤ 100), and high (>100) CACS groups each consisted of 462, 213, and 225 patients, respectively. Similarly, the low (0), medium (1-4), and high (>4) AACS groups included 638, 159, and 147 patients, respectively. The primary outcome was the occurrence of cardiovascular events. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and composite kidney outcomes, which comprised of >50% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and graft loss. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the association between baseline CACS/AACS and outcomes.

Results: The high CACS group (N = 462) faced a significantly higher risk for cardiovascular outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 5.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01-17.7) and all-cause mortality (aHR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.27-5.92) compared to the low CACS group (N = 225). Similarly, the high AACS group (N = 638) had an elevated risk for cardiovascular outcomes (aHR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.16-4.88). Furthermore, the addition of CACS to prediction models improved prediction indices for cardiovascular outcomes. However, the risk of renal outcomes did not differ among CACS or AACS groups.

Conclusion: Pretransplant arterial calcification, characterized by high CACS or AACS, is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in kidney transplant patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信