瑞士儿童癌症幸存者的善后护理--全科医生模式。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Maria Otth, Sabine Kroiss-Benninger, Katrin Scheinemann
{"title":"瑞士儿童癌症幸存者的善后护理--全科医生模式。","authors":"Maria Otth, Sabine Kroiss-Benninger, Katrin Scheinemann","doi":"10.1089/jayao.2024.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) represent a growing population worldwide, and lifelong follow-up care is recommended for most. Once CCS become adults, the transition to adult care is emerging. Today, there is no transition or long-term follow-up care model in the adult setting that clearly outweighs others. We therefore aimed to evaluate the transition to physicians outside the hospital. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this single-center, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, we assessed in 2022 the current follow-up care situation of CCS who already transitioned to physicians outside the hospital (family physicians, pediatricians). We asked CCS about cancer knowledge, worries, self-management skills, and expectations and physicians about their experience with CCS and their needs when caring for CCS. We included physicians where a CCS was transitioned to. We compared the results with CCS transitioned in a hospital setting and used descriptive statistics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-three CCS responded to the questionnaire (median age at questionnaire of 22 years, median 14 years since diagnosis). Nearly two-thirds reported not being in follow-up care anymore. The cancer knowledge was good, and cancer worries were low. Twenty-eight physicians responded with 21 reporting that they care for CCS. Half of them see CCS for acute problems only. Physicians are open to care for CCS but request the necessary recommendations and would also be available for respective training. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Transition to physicians might be an option for selected CCS. However, education and empowerment of CCS early on and education of physicians is urgently needed to prevent loss to follow-up, which may lead to lifelong nonengagement and incorrect perceptions about future health.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aftercare of Childhood Cancer Survivors in Switzerland-The General Practitioner Model.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Otth, Sabine Kroiss-Benninger, Katrin Scheinemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jayao.2024.0059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) represent a growing population worldwide, and lifelong follow-up care is recommended for most. Once CCS become adults, the transition to adult care is emerging. Today, there is no transition or long-term follow-up care model in the adult setting that clearly outweighs others. We therefore aimed to evaluate the transition to physicians outside the hospital. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this single-center, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, we assessed in 2022 the current follow-up care situation of CCS who already transitioned to physicians outside the hospital (family physicians, pediatricians). We asked CCS about cancer knowledge, worries, self-management skills, and expectations and physicians about their experience with CCS and their needs when caring for CCS. We included physicians where a CCS was transitioned to. We compared the results with CCS transitioned in a hospital setting and used descriptive statistics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-three CCS responded to the questionnaire (median age at questionnaire of 22 years, median 14 years since diagnosis). Nearly two-thirds reported not being in follow-up care anymore. The cancer knowledge was good, and cancer worries were low. Twenty-eight physicians responded with 21 reporting that they care for CCS. Half of them see CCS for acute problems only. Physicians are open to care for CCS but request the necessary recommendations and would also be available for respective training. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Transition to physicians might be an option for selected CCS. However, education and empowerment of CCS early on and education of physicians is urgently needed to prevent loss to follow-up, which may lead to lifelong nonengagement and incorrect perceptions about future health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2024.0059\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2024.0059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿童癌症幸存者(CCS)是全球不断增长的一个群体,大多数人都被建议接受终生随访护理。一旦儿童癌症幸存者长大成人,就需要过渡到成人护理。目前,在成人环境中还没有明显优于其他环境的过渡或长期随访护理模式。因此,我们旨在评估向院外医生过渡的情况。方法:在这项以问卷调查为基础的单中心横断面研究中,我们评估了 2022 年已过渡到医院外医生(家庭医生、儿科医生)的慢性病患者目前的随访护理情况。我们向慢性病患者询问了癌症知识、担忧、自我管理技能和期望,并向医生询问了他们与慢性病患者接触的经验以及他们在护理慢性病患者时的需求。我们还询问了社区癌症护理人员过渡到的医生。我们将结果与在医院环境中过渡的 CCS 进行了比较,并使用了描述性统计。结果:23 名慢性病患者回答了问卷(问卷调查时的中位年龄为 22 岁,确诊后的中位年龄为 14 年)。近三分之二的人表示不再接受后续治疗。他们对癌症的了解程度较高,对癌症的担忧程度较低。有 28 名医生回复了问卷,其中 21 名医生表示他们为慢性病患者提供治疗。其中半数医生只为急性病患者看病。医生对护理社区保健中心持开放态度,但要求提供必要的建议,并愿意接受相关培训。结论对于选定的社区护理人员来说,向医生过渡可能是一种选择。然而,为了防止失去随访机会,急需对社区保健服务人员进行早期教育和授权,并对医生进行教育,这可能会导致终身不参与和对未来健康的错误认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aftercare of Childhood Cancer Survivors in Switzerland-The General Practitioner Model.

Purpose: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) represent a growing population worldwide, and lifelong follow-up care is recommended for most. Once CCS become adults, the transition to adult care is emerging. Today, there is no transition or long-term follow-up care model in the adult setting that clearly outweighs others. We therefore aimed to evaluate the transition to physicians outside the hospital. Methods: In this single-center, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, we assessed in 2022 the current follow-up care situation of CCS who already transitioned to physicians outside the hospital (family physicians, pediatricians). We asked CCS about cancer knowledge, worries, self-management skills, and expectations and physicians about their experience with CCS and their needs when caring for CCS. We included physicians where a CCS was transitioned to. We compared the results with CCS transitioned in a hospital setting and used descriptive statistics. Results: Twenty-three CCS responded to the questionnaire (median age at questionnaire of 22 years, median 14 years since diagnosis). Nearly two-thirds reported not being in follow-up care anymore. The cancer knowledge was good, and cancer worries were low. Twenty-eight physicians responded with 21 reporting that they care for CCS. Half of them see CCS for acute problems only. Physicians are open to care for CCS but request the necessary recommendations and would also be available for respective training. Conclusion: Transition to physicians might be an option for selected CCS. However, education and empowerment of CCS early on and education of physicians is urgently needed to prevent loss to follow-up, which may lead to lifelong nonengagement and incorrect perceptions about future health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信