急诊严重程度指数第 4 版与儿科急诊患者的分诊。

IF 24.7 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Dana R Sax, E Margaret Warton, Mamata V Kene, Dustin W Ballard, Tina J Vitale, Jenna A Timm, Eloa S Adams, Katherine R McGauhey, Jesse M Pines, Mary E Reed
{"title":"急诊严重程度指数第 4 版与儿科急诊患者的分诊。","authors":"Dana R Sax, E Margaret Warton, Mamata V Kene, Dustin W Ballard, Tina J Vitale, Jenna A Timm, Eloa S Adams, Katherine R McGauhey, Jesse M Pines, Mary E Reed","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.2671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Most emergency departments (EDs) across the US use the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) to predict acuity and resource needs. A comprehensive assessment of ESI accuracy among pediatric patients is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the frequency of mistriage using ESI (version 4) among pediatric ED visits using automated measures of mistriage and identify characteristics associated with mistriage.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used operational measures for each ESI level to classify encounters as undertriaged, overtriaged, or correctly triaged to assess the accuracy of the ESI and identify characteristics of mistriage. Participants were pediatric patients at 21 EDs within Kaiser Permanente Northern California from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. During that time, version 4 of the ESI was in use by these EDs. Visits with missing ESI, incomplete ED time variables, patients transferred from another ED, and those who left against medical advice or without being seen were excluded. Data were analyzed between January 2022 and June 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Assigned ESI level.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Rates of undertriage and overtriage by assigned ESI level based on mistriage algorithm, patient and visit characteristics associated with undertriage and overtriage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 1 016 816 pediatric ED visits; the mean (SD) age of patients was 7.3 (5.6) years, 479 610 (47.2%) were female, and 537 206 (52.8%) were male. Correct triage occurred in 346 918 visits (34.1%; 95% CI, 34.0%-34.2%), while overtriage and undertriage occurred in 594 485 visits (58.5%; 95% CI, 58.4%-58.6%) and 75 413 visits (7.4%; 95% CI, 7.4%-7.5%), respectively. In adjusted analyses, undertriage was more common among children at least 6 years old compared with those younger 6 years; male patients compared with female patients; patients with Asian, Black, or Hispanic or other races or ethnicities compared with White patients; patients with comorbid illnesses compared with those without; and patients who arrived by ambulance compared with nonambulance patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study found that mistriage with ESI version 4 was common in pediatric ED visits. There is an opportunity to improve pediatric ED triage, both in early identification of critically ill patients (limit undertriage) and in more accurate identification of low-acuity patients with low resource needs (limit overtriage). Future research should include assessments based on version 5 of the ESI, which was released after this study was completed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14683,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1027-1034"},"PeriodicalIF":24.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Severity Index Version 4 and Triage of Pediatric Emergency Department Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Dana R Sax, E Margaret Warton, Mamata V Kene, Dustin W Ballard, Tina J Vitale, Jenna A Timm, Eloa S Adams, Katherine R McGauhey, Jesse M Pines, Mary E Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.2671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Most emergency departments (EDs) across the US use the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) to predict acuity and resource needs. A comprehensive assessment of ESI accuracy among pediatric patients is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the frequency of mistriage using ESI (version 4) among pediatric ED visits using automated measures of mistriage and identify characteristics associated with mistriage.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used operational measures for each ESI level to classify encounters as undertriaged, overtriaged, or correctly triaged to assess the accuracy of the ESI and identify characteristics of mistriage. Participants were pediatric patients at 21 EDs within Kaiser Permanente Northern California from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. During that time, version 4 of the ESI was in use by these EDs. Visits with missing ESI, incomplete ED time variables, patients transferred from another ED, and those who left against medical advice or without being seen were excluded. Data were analyzed between January 2022 and June 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Assigned ESI level.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Rates of undertriage and overtriage by assigned ESI level based on mistriage algorithm, patient and visit characteristics associated with undertriage and overtriage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 1 016 816 pediatric ED visits; the mean (SD) age of patients was 7.3 (5.6) years, 479 610 (47.2%) were female, and 537 206 (52.8%) were male. Correct triage occurred in 346 918 visits (34.1%; 95% CI, 34.0%-34.2%), while overtriage and undertriage occurred in 594 485 visits (58.5%; 95% CI, 58.4%-58.6%) and 75 413 visits (7.4%; 95% CI, 7.4%-7.5%), respectively. In adjusted analyses, undertriage was more common among children at least 6 years old compared with those younger 6 years; male patients compared with female patients; patients with Asian, Black, or Hispanic or other races or ethnicities compared with White patients; patients with comorbid illnesses compared with those without; and patients who arrived by ambulance compared with nonambulance patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study found that mistriage with ESI version 4 was common in pediatric ED visits. There is an opportunity to improve pediatric ED triage, both in early identification of critically ill patients (limit undertriage) and in more accurate identification of low-acuity patients with low resource needs (limit overtriage). Future research should include assessments based on version 5 of the ESI, which was released after this study was completed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1027-1034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":24.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320334/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.2671\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.2671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:美国大多数急诊科(ED)都使用急诊严重程度指数(ESI)来预测病情严重程度和资源需求。目前还缺乏对儿科患者ESI准确性的全面评估:目的:使用ESI(第4版)评估儿科急诊室就诊者中误诊的频率,并确定与误诊相关的特征:这项队列研究使用每个 ESI 级别的操作措施将就诊情况分为分流不足、分流过度或正确分流,以评估 ESI 的准确性并确定误诊的特征。参与者为北加州凯泽医疗集团下属 21 家急诊室的儿科患者,时间为 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。在此期间,这些急诊室使用的是第 4 版 ESI。缺失 ESI 的就诊、不完整的 ED 时间变量、从其他 ED 转来的患者以及不听医嘱离开或未就诊的患者均被排除在外。数据分析时间为 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月:主要结果和测量指标:主要结果和测量指标:根据误诊算法分配的ESI级别的误诊率和超诊率,与误诊和超诊相关的患者和就诊特征:这项研究包括 1 016 816 名儿科急诊就诊者;患者的平均年龄(SD)为 7.3 (5.6)岁,女性 479 610 人(47.2%),男性 537 206 人(52.8%)。346 918 人次(34.1%;95% CI,34.0%-34.2%)得到了正确分流,而 594 485 人次(58.5%;95% CI,58.4%-58.6%)和 75 413 人次(7.4%;95% CI,7.4%-7.5%)分别出现了分流过度和分流不足。在调整后的分析中,至少 6 岁的儿童与 6 岁以下的儿童相比,男性患者与女性患者相比,亚裔、黑人、西班牙裔或其他种族或族裔患者与白人患者相比,合并症患者与非合并症患者相比,以及乘救护车就诊的患者与非乘救护车就诊的患者相比,误诊率更高:这项多中心回顾性研究发现,在儿科急诊就诊中,ESI 第 4 版的误诊现象很常见。现在有机会改进儿科急诊室分诊,包括早期识别危重病人(限制误诊)和更准确地识别资源需求低的低急诊病人(限制过度分诊)。未来的研究应包括基于ESI第5版的评估,该版本是在本研究完成后发布的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency Severity Index Version 4 and Triage of Pediatric Emergency Department Patients.

Importance: Most emergency departments (EDs) across the US use the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) to predict acuity and resource needs. A comprehensive assessment of ESI accuracy among pediatric patients is lacking.

Objective: To assess the frequency of mistriage using ESI (version 4) among pediatric ED visits using automated measures of mistriage and identify characteristics associated with mistriage.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used operational measures for each ESI level to classify encounters as undertriaged, overtriaged, or correctly triaged to assess the accuracy of the ESI and identify characteristics of mistriage. Participants were pediatric patients at 21 EDs within Kaiser Permanente Northern California from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. During that time, version 4 of the ESI was in use by these EDs. Visits with missing ESI, incomplete ED time variables, patients transferred from another ED, and those who left against medical advice or without being seen were excluded. Data were analyzed between January 2022 and June 2023.

Exposures: Assigned ESI level.

Main outcomes and measures: Rates of undertriage and overtriage by assigned ESI level based on mistriage algorithm, patient and visit characteristics associated with undertriage and overtriage.

Results: This study included 1 016 816 pediatric ED visits; the mean (SD) age of patients was 7.3 (5.6) years, 479 610 (47.2%) were female, and 537 206 (52.8%) were male. Correct triage occurred in 346 918 visits (34.1%; 95% CI, 34.0%-34.2%), while overtriage and undertriage occurred in 594 485 visits (58.5%; 95% CI, 58.4%-58.6%) and 75 413 visits (7.4%; 95% CI, 7.4%-7.5%), respectively. In adjusted analyses, undertriage was more common among children at least 6 years old compared with those younger 6 years; male patients compared with female patients; patients with Asian, Black, or Hispanic or other races or ethnicities compared with White patients; patients with comorbid illnesses compared with those without; and patients who arrived by ambulance compared with nonambulance patients.

Conclusions and relevance: This multicenter retrospective study found that mistriage with ESI version 4 was common in pediatric ED visits. There is an opportunity to improve pediatric ED triage, both in early identification of critically ill patients (limit undertriage) and in more accurate identification of low-acuity patients with low resource needs (limit overtriage). Future research should include assessments based on version 5 of the ESI, which was released after this study was completed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Pediatrics
JAMA Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
31.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: JAMA Pediatrics, the oldest continuously published pediatric journal in the US since 1911, is an international peer-reviewed publication and a part of the JAMA Network. Published weekly online and in 12 issues annually, it garners over 8.4 million article views and downloads yearly. All research articles become freely accessible online after 12 months without any author fees, and through the WHO's HINARI program, the online version is accessible to institutions in developing countries. With a focus on advancing the health of infants, children, and adolescents, JAMA Pediatrics serves as a platform for discussing crucial issues and policies in child and adolescent health care. Leveraging the latest technology, it ensures timely access to information for its readers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信