经颅磁刺激和脑磁图在优化响应性神经刺激装置的放置方面,是侵入性方法的可行替代方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
J. Austin Varner , Roozbeh Rezaie , Negar Noorizadeh , Frederick A. Boop , Stephen P. Fulton , Paul Klimo , Nir Shimony , James W. Wheless , Shalini Narayana
{"title":"经颅磁刺激和脑磁图在优化响应性神经刺激装置的放置方面,是侵入性方法的可行替代方案。","authors":"J. Austin Varner ,&nbsp;Roozbeh Rezaie ,&nbsp;Negar Noorizadeh ,&nbsp;Frederick A. Boop ,&nbsp;Stephen P. Fulton ,&nbsp;Paul Klimo ,&nbsp;Nir Shimony ,&nbsp;James W. Wheless ,&nbsp;Shalini Narayana","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a treatment option for patients with refractory epilepsy when surgical resection is not possible due to overlap of the irritative zone and eloquent cortex. Presurgical evaluations for RNS placement typically rely on invasive methods. This study investigated the potential of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) to provide key presurgical information non-invasively. We hypothesized that these non-invasive methods may assist in optimizing RNS placement by providing useful information for seizure localization by MEG and eloquent cortex mapping by TMS. A retrospective chart review identified nine patients who underwent RNS placement (mean age = 20.4 years [<em>SD</em> = 5.6], two-thirds were female). Characterization of the irritative zone using MEG was successful in eight of nine patients. Non-invasive mapping of relevant eloquent cortex was attempted in all patients. TMS was successful in eight of nine patients, and MEG was successful in two of six patients. Importantly, patients mapped with non-invasive modalities experienced an average seizure reduction of 77 % at their most recent clinic visit, compared to 75 % seizure reduction in those with invasive evaluations, indicating appropriate RNS placement. These data demonstrate that TMS and MEG can provide key information for RNS and may be feasible alternatives to invasive methods for assisting in decision making regarding RNS placement. Non-invasive methods for determining RNS placement have a high rate of success when data from multiple non-invasive modalities converge and can inform more accurate placement of intracranial electrodes prior to RNS placement or mitigate their need.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 107426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124001414/pdfft?md5=b574e602655eca86054b0d15a28e797b&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124001414-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcranial magnetic stimulation and magnetoencephalography are feasible alternatives to invasive methods in optimizing responsive neurostimulation device placement\",\"authors\":\"J. Austin Varner ,&nbsp;Roozbeh Rezaie ,&nbsp;Negar Noorizadeh ,&nbsp;Frederick A. Boop ,&nbsp;Stephen P. Fulton ,&nbsp;Paul Klimo ,&nbsp;Nir Shimony ,&nbsp;James W. Wheless ,&nbsp;Shalini Narayana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a treatment option for patients with refractory epilepsy when surgical resection is not possible due to overlap of the irritative zone and eloquent cortex. Presurgical evaluations for RNS placement typically rely on invasive methods. This study investigated the potential of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) to provide key presurgical information non-invasively. We hypothesized that these non-invasive methods may assist in optimizing RNS placement by providing useful information for seizure localization by MEG and eloquent cortex mapping by TMS. A retrospective chart review identified nine patients who underwent RNS placement (mean age = 20.4 years [<em>SD</em> = 5.6], two-thirds were female). Characterization of the irritative zone using MEG was successful in eight of nine patients. Non-invasive mapping of relevant eloquent cortex was attempted in all patients. TMS was successful in eight of nine patients, and MEG was successful in two of six patients. Importantly, patients mapped with non-invasive modalities experienced an average seizure reduction of 77 % at their most recent clinic visit, compared to 75 % seizure reduction in those with invasive evaluations, indicating appropriate RNS placement. These data demonstrate that TMS and MEG can provide key information for RNS and may be feasible alternatives to invasive methods for assisting in decision making regarding RNS placement. Non-invasive methods for determining RNS placement have a high rate of success when data from multiple non-invasive modalities converge and can inform more accurate placement of intracranial electrodes prior to RNS placement or mitigate their need.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy Research\",\"volume\":\"206 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124001414/pdfft?md5=b574e602655eca86054b0d15a28e797b&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124001414-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124001414\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124001414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当刺激区与大脑皮层重叠而无法进行手术切除时,反应性神经刺激(RNS)是难治性癫痫患者的一种治疗选择。放置 RNS 的术前评估通常依赖于侵入性方法。本研究调查了经颅磁刺激(TMS)和脑磁图(MEG)提供非侵入性关键术前信息的潜力。我们假设这些非侵入性方法可以通过 MEG 为癫痫定位提供有用的信息,通过 TMS 为大脑皮层映射提供有用的信息,从而帮助优化 RNS 安置。一项回顾性病历审查确定了九名接受 RNS 安放的患者(平均年龄 = 20.4 岁 [SD = 5.6],三分之二为女性)。九名患者中有八名成功使用 MEG 确定了刺激区的特征。所有患者都尝试了相关能动皮层的非侵入性映射。九名患者中有八名成功接受了 TMS 治疗,六名患者中有两名成功接受了 MEG 治疗。重要的是,使用非侵入性模式进行映射的患者在最近一次门诊就诊时癫痫发作平均减少了 77%,而使用侵入性评估的患者癫痫发作减少了 75%,这表明 RNS 安置得当。这些数据表明,TMS 和 MEG 可为 RNS 提供关键信息,并可能成为有创方法的可行替代方法,以协助有关 RNS 安置的决策制定。当来自多种非侵入性模式的数据汇聚在一起时,用于确定 RNS 安放位置的非侵入性方法的成功率很高,并能在 RNS 安放前为颅内电极的更精确安放提供信息或减少对其的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and magnetoencephalography are feasible alternatives to invasive methods in optimizing responsive neurostimulation device placement

Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a treatment option for patients with refractory epilepsy when surgical resection is not possible due to overlap of the irritative zone and eloquent cortex. Presurgical evaluations for RNS placement typically rely on invasive methods. This study investigated the potential of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) to provide key presurgical information non-invasively. We hypothesized that these non-invasive methods may assist in optimizing RNS placement by providing useful information for seizure localization by MEG and eloquent cortex mapping by TMS. A retrospective chart review identified nine patients who underwent RNS placement (mean age = 20.4 years [SD = 5.6], two-thirds were female). Characterization of the irritative zone using MEG was successful in eight of nine patients. Non-invasive mapping of relevant eloquent cortex was attempted in all patients. TMS was successful in eight of nine patients, and MEG was successful in two of six patients. Importantly, patients mapped with non-invasive modalities experienced an average seizure reduction of 77 % at their most recent clinic visit, compared to 75 % seizure reduction in those with invasive evaluations, indicating appropriate RNS placement. These data demonstrate that TMS and MEG can provide key information for RNS and may be feasible alternatives to invasive methods for assisting in decision making regarding RNS placement. Non-invasive methods for determining RNS placement have a high rate of success when data from multiple non-invasive modalities converge and can inform more accurate placement of intracranial electrodes prior to RNS placement or mitigate their need.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信