{"title":"阿巴他赛与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂在治疗类风湿性关节炎相关间质性肺病过程中对死亡率和医疗费用的影响:一项大规模真实世界回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Po-Cheng Shih, Chih-Cheng Lai, Qing-Hua Zou, Shiow-Ing Wang, Xiang-Yang Huang, James Cheng Chung Wei","doi":"10.1007/s10238-024-01448-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease, and interstitial lung disease is one of the important extra-articular manifestations. There is limited evidence comparing abatacept (ABA) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) regarding the risk of mortality among patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk of mortality in patients with RA-ILD treated with ABA compared to TNFi. This retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX electronic health record database. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with RA-ILD and had received a new prescription for either ABA or TNFi. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on their initial prescription. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were healthcare utilizations, including hospitalization, critical care services, and mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analyses were performed on age, presence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), and cardiovascular risk. Among 34,388 RA-ILD patients, 895 were selected for each group (ABA and TNFi) following propensity score matching. The ABA group exhibited a higher all-cause mortality risk. (HR 1.296, 95% CI 1.006-1.671). Subgroup analysis showed a heightened risk of receiving mechanical ventilation in ABA-treated patients aged 18-64 years old (HR 1.853, 95% CI 1.002-3.426), and those with cardiovascular risk factors (HR 2.015, 95% CI 1.118-3.630). Another subgroup analysis indicated a higher risk of mortality among ABA-treated patients with positive-ACPA. (HR 4.138 95% CI 1.343-12.75). This real-world data research demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality in RA-ILD patients treated with ABA compared to TNFi, particularly those aged 18-64 years, lacking cardiovascular risk factors, and positive-ACPA. ABA was associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation in patients aged 18-64 years and those with cardiovascular risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors on mortality and medical utilizations in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease: a large-scale real-world retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Po-Cheng Shih, Chih-Cheng Lai, Qing-Hua Zou, Shiow-Ing Wang, Xiang-Yang Huang, James Cheng Chung Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10238-024-01448-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease, and interstitial lung disease is one of the important extra-articular manifestations. There is limited evidence comparing abatacept (ABA) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) regarding the risk of mortality among patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk of mortality in patients with RA-ILD treated with ABA compared to TNFi. This retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX electronic health record database. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with RA-ILD and had received a new prescription for either ABA or TNFi. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on their initial prescription. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were healthcare utilizations, including hospitalization, critical care services, and mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analyses were performed on age, presence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), and cardiovascular risk. Among 34,388 RA-ILD patients, 895 were selected for each group (ABA and TNFi) following propensity score matching. The ABA group exhibited a higher all-cause mortality risk. (HR 1.296, 95% CI 1.006-1.671). Subgroup analysis showed a heightened risk of receiving mechanical ventilation in ABA-treated patients aged 18-64 years old (HR 1.853, 95% CI 1.002-3.426), and those with cardiovascular risk factors (HR 2.015, 95% CI 1.118-3.630). Another subgroup analysis indicated a higher risk of mortality among ABA-treated patients with positive-ACPA. (HR 4.138 95% CI 1.343-12.75). This real-world data research demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality in RA-ILD patients treated with ABA compared to TNFi, particularly those aged 18-64 years, lacking cardiovascular risk factors, and positive-ACPA. ABA was associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation in patients aged 18-64 years and those with cardiovascular risk factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319376/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01448-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01448-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
类风湿性关节炎是一种慢性炎症性疾病,间质性肺病是其重要的关节外表现之一。关于类风湿性关节炎相关间质性肺病(RA-ILD)患者的死亡风险,阿巴他赛普(ABA)与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)的比较证据有限。本研究的目的是调查类风湿性关节炎相关性间质性肺病(RA-ILD)患者接受 ABA 治疗后的死亡风险与 TNFi 治疗后的死亡风险的比较。这项回顾性队列研究利用了 TriNetX 电子健康记录数据库。我们招募了被确诊为RA-ILD并获得ABA或TNFi新处方的患者。根据初始处方将患者分为两个队列。主要结果为全因死亡率,次要结果为医疗利用率,包括住院、重症监护服务和机械通气。根据年龄、是否存在抗瓜氨酸肽抗体(ACPA)和心血管风险进行了分组分析。在34,388名RA-ILD患者中,经过倾向评分匹配,每组(ABA组和TNFi组)各选出895人。ABA组的全因死亡风险较高。(HR 1.296, 95% CI 1.006-1.671)。亚组分析显示,接受 ABA 治疗的 18-64 岁患者接受机械通气的风险更高(HR 1.853,95% CI 1.002-3.426),有心血管风险因素的患者接受机械通气的风险更高(HR 2.015,95% CI 1.118-3.630)。另一项亚组分析显示,经 ABA 治疗的 ACPA 阳性患者的死亡风险更高。(HR 4.138 95% CI 1.343-12.75)。这项真实世界数据研究表明,与 TNFi 相比,接受 ABA 治疗的 RA-ILD 患者的全因死亡风险更高,尤其是那些年龄在 18-64 岁之间、缺乏心血管风险因素且 ACPA 呈阳性的患者。在18-64岁和有心血管风险因素的患者中,ABA与机械通气风险增加有关。
Abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors on mortality and medical utilizations in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease: a large-scale real-world retrospective cohort study.
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease, and interstitial lung disease is one of the important extra-articular manifestations. There is limited evidence comparing abatacept (ABA) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) regarding the risk of mortality among patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk of mortality in patients with RA-ILD treated with ABA compared to TNFi. This retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX electronic health record database. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with RA-ILD and had received a new prescription for either ABA or TNFi. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on their initial prescription. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were healthcare utilizations, including hospitalization, critical care services, and mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analyses were performed on age, presence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), and cardiovascular risk. Among 34,388 RA-ILD patients, 895 were selected for each group (ABA and TNFi) following propensity score matching. The ABA group exhibited a higher all-cause mortality risk. (HR 1.296, 95% CI 1.006-1.671). Subgroup analysis showed a heightened risk of receiving mechanical ventilation in ABA-treated patients aged 18-64 years old (HR 1.853, 95% CI 1.002-3.426), and those with cardiovascular risk factors (HR 2.015, 95% CI 1.118-3.630). Another subgroup analysis indicated a higher risk of mortality among ABA-treated patients with positive-ACPA. (HR 4.138 95% CI 1.343-12.75). This real-world data research demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality in RA-ILD patients treated with ABA compared to TNFi, particularly those aged 18-64 years, lacking cardiovascular risk factors, and positive-ACPA. ABA was associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation in patients aged 18-64 years and those with cardiovascular risk factors.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.