推进过渡年龄青少年焦虑症的治疗:无意识暴露治疗效果回顾。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Paul Siegel, Bradley S. Peterson
{"title":"推进过渡年龄青少年焦虑症的治疗:无意识暴露治疗效果回顾。","authors":"Paul Siegel,&nbsp;Bradley S. Peterson","doi":"10.1111/jcpp.14037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The real-world effectiveness of exposure-based therapies for youth depends on the willingness and ability of young people to tolerate confronting their fears, which can be experienced as highly aversive and create problems with treatment engagement and acceptance. Recently, neuroscientific research on the nonconscious basis of fear has been translated into novel exposure interventions that bypass conscious processing of feared stimuli and that thus do not cause phobic youth to experience distress. We present a review of these unconscious exposure interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A PRISMA-based search yielded 20 controlled experiments based on three paradigms that tested if fear-related responses could be reduced without conscious awareness in highly phobic, transition-age youth: 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 5 fMRI studies (1 was also an RCT), 4 psychophysiological studies (3 were also RCTs), and 1 ERP study. We conducted meta-analyses of outcomes where feasible.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Unconscious exposure interventions significantly (1) reduced avoidance behavior (range of Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.51–0.95) and self-reported fear (<i>d</i> = 0.45–1.25) during in vivo exposure to the feared situation; (2) reduced neurobiological indicators of fear (<i>d</i> = 0.54–0.62) and concomitant physiological arousal (<i>d</i> = 0.55–0.64); (3) activated neural systems supporting fear regulation more strongly than visible exposure to the same stimuli (<i>d</i> = 1.2–1.5); (4) activated regions supporting fear regulation that mediated the reduction of avoidance behavior (<i>d</i> = 0.70); (5) evoked ERPs suggesting encoding of extinction memories (<i>d</i> = 2.13); and (6) had these effects without inducing autonomic arousal or subjective fear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Unconscious exposure interventions significantly reduce a variety of symptomatic behaviors with mostly moderate effect sizes in transition-age youth with specific phobias. fMRI and physiological findings establish a neurophysiological basis for this efficacy, and suggest it occurs through extinction learning. Unconscious exposure was well tolerated, entirely unassociated with drop out, and is highly scalable for clinical practice. However, a number of limitations must be addressed to assess potential clinical impacts, including combining unconscious exposure with exposure therapy to boost treatment acceptance and efficacy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","volume":"66 1","pages":"98-121"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing the treatment of anxiety disorders in transition-age youth: a review of the therapeutic effects of unconscious exposure\",\"authors\":\"Paul Siegel,&nbsp;Bradley S. Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcpp.14037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The real-world effectiveness of exposure-based therapies for youth depends on the willingness and ability of young people to tolerate confronting their fears, which can be experienced as highly aversive and create problems with treatment engagement and acceptance. Recently, neuroscientific research on the nonconscious basis of fear has been translated into novel exposure interventions that bypass conscious processing of feared stimuli and that thus do not cause phobic youth to experience distress. We present a review of these unconscious exposure interventions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A PRISMA-based search yielded 20 controlled experiments based on three paradigms that tested if fear-related responses could be reduced without conscious awareness in highly phobic, transition-age youth: 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 5 fMRI studies (1 was also an RCT), 4 psychophysiological studies (3 were also RCTs), and 1 ERP study. We conducted meta-analyses of outcomes where feasible.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Unconscious exposure interventions significantly (1) reduced avoidance behavior (range of Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.51–0.95) and self-reported fear (<i>d</i> = 0.45–1.25) during in vivo exposure to the feared situation; (2) reduced neurobiological indicators of fear (<i>d</i> = 0.54–0.62) and concomitant physiological arousal (<i>d</i> = 0.55–0.64); (3) activated neural systems supporting fear regulation more strongly than visible exposure to the same stimuli (<i>d</i> = 1.2–1.5); (4) activated regions supporting fear regulation that mediated the reduction of avoidance behavior (<i>d</i> = 0.70); (5) evoked ERPs suggesting encoding of extinction memories (<i>d</i> = 2.13); and (6) had these effects without inducing autonomic arousal or subjective fear.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Unconscious exposure interventions significantly reduce a variety of symptomatic behaviors with mostly moderate effect sizes in transition-age youth with specific phobias. fMRI and physiological findings establish a neurophysiological basis for this efficacy, and suggest it occurs through extinction learning. Unconscious exposure was well tolerated, entirely unassociated with drop out, and is highly scalable for clinical practice. However, a number of limitations must be addressed to assess potential clinical impacts, including combining unconscious exposure with exposure therapy to boost treatment acceptance and efficacy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"98-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.14037\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.14037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:暴露疗法对青少年的实际效果取决于青少年是否愿意和有能力忍受面对自己的恐惧,而这种恐惧可能会让青少年产生强烈的厌恶感,并在治疗参与度和接受度方面造成问题。最近,关于恐惧的非意识基础的神经科学研究已被转化为新的暴露干预方法,这些方法绕过了对恐惧刺激的有意识处理,因此不会使患有恐惧症的青少年感到痛苦。我们将对这些无意识暴露干预措施进行综述:方法:通过基于 PRISMA 的搜索,我们找到了 20 项基于三种范式的对照实验,这些实验测试了在高度恐惧的过渡年龄青少年中,是否可以在无意识的情况下减少与恐惧相关的反应:14 项随机对照试验 (RCT)、5 项 fMRI 研究(其中 1 项也是 RCT)、4 项心理生理学研究(其中 3 项也是 RCT)和 1 项 ERP 研究。在可行的情况下,我们对结果进行了荟萃分析:结果:无意识暴露干预显著(1)减少了体内暴露于恐惧情境时的回避行为(Cohen's d = 0.51-0.95 的范围)和自我报告的恐惧(d = 0.45-1.25);(2)减少了恐惧的神经生物学指标(d = 0.54-0.62 )和伴随的生理唤醒(d = 0.55-0.64);(3)激活了支持恐惧调节的神经系统,比暴露于相同刺激下的可见神经系统更强(d = 1.2-1.5);(4)激活了支持恐惧调节的区域,这些区域介导了回避行为的减少(d = 0.70);(5)诱发了ERPs,暗示了消减记忆的编码(d = 2.13);(6)在不诱发自律神经唤醒或主观恐惧的情况下产生了这些效果:fMRI和生理学研究结果为这一疗效奠定了神经生理学基础,并表明它是通过消减学习实现的。无意识暴露疗法的耐受性很好,完全不会导致辍学,而且非常适合临床实践。然而,要评估潜在的临床影响,还必须解决一些局限性,包括将无意识暴露与暴露疗法相结合,以提高治疗的接受度和疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing the treatment of anxiety disorders in transition-age youth: a review of the therapeutic effects of unconscious exposure

Background

The real-world effectiveness of exposure-based therapies for youth depends on the willingness and ability of young people to tolerate confronting their fears, which can be experienced as highly aversive and create problems with treatment engagement and acceptance. Recently, neuroscientific research on the nonconscious basis of fear has been translated into novel exposure interventions that bypass conscious processing of feared stimuli and that thus do not cause phobic youth to experience distress. We present a review of these unconscious exposure interventions.

Methods

A PRISMA-based search yielded 20 controlled experiments based on three paradigms that tested if fear-related responses could be reduced without conscious awareness in highly phobic, transition-age youth: 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 5 fMRI studies (1 was also an RCT), 4 psychophysiological studies (3 were also RCTs), and 1 ERP study. We conducted meta-analyses of outcomes where feasible.

Results

Unconscious exposure interventions significantly (1) reduced avoidance behavior (range of Cohen's d = 0.51–0.95) and self-reported fear (d = 0.45–1.25) during in vivo exposure to the feared situation; (2) reduced neurobiological indicators of fear (d = 0.54–0.62) and concomitant physiological arousal (d = 0.55–0.64); (3) activated neural systems supporting fear regulation more strongly than visible exposure to the same stimuli (d = 1.2–1.5); (4) activated regions supporting fear regulation that mediated the reduction of avoidance behavior (d = 0.70); (5) evoked ERPs suggesting encoding of extinction memories (d = 2.13); and (6) had these effects without inducing autonomic arousal or subjective fear.

Conclusions

Unconscious exposure interventions significantly reduce a variety of symptomatic behaviors with mostly moderate effect sizes in transition-age youth with specific phobias. fMRI and physiological findings establish a neurophysiological basis for this efficacy, and suggest it occurs through extinction learning. Unconscious exposure was well tolerated, entirely unassociated with drop out, and is highly scalable for clinical practice. However, a number of limitations must be addressed to assess potential clinical impacts, including combining unconscious exposure with exposure therapy to boost treatment acceptance and efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (JCPP) is a highly regarded international publication that focuses on the fields of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry. It is recognized for publishing top-tier, clinically relevant research across various disciplines related to these areas. JCPP has a broad global readership and covers a diverse range of topics, including: Epidemiology: Studies on the prevalence and distribution of mental health issues in children and adolescents. Diagnosis: Research on the identification and classification of childhood disorders. Treatments: Psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological interventions for child and adolescent mental health. Behavior and Cognition: Studies on the behavioral and cognitive aspects of childhood disorders. Neuroscience and Neurobiology: Research on the neural and biological underpinnings of child mental health. Genetics: Genetic factors contributing to the development of childhood disorders. JCPP serves as a platform for integrating empirical research, clinical studies, and high-quality reviews from diverse perspectives, theoretical viewpoints, and disciplines. This interdisciplinary approach is a key feature of the journal, as it fosters a comprehensive understanding of child and adolescent mental health. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry is published 12 times a year and is affiliated with the Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (ACAMH), which supports the journal's mission to advance knowledge and practice in the field of child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信