对 "根据对选择或分配的与任务无关元素的偏好，在一项运动任务中的表现存在差异：一项随机对照研究"[人类运动科学 96 (2024) 1-10/103253] 的更正：随机对照研究" [Human Movement Science 96 (2024) 1-10/103253]。

IF 1.6 3区心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES

Human Movement Science Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2024.103267

Félix Arbinaga , Eduardo José Fernández-Ozcorta , Irene Checa , Ana García-Robles , Débora Godoy-Izquierdo

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Corrigendum to “Differential performance on a motor task according to the preference for task-irrelevant elements that are chosen or assigned: A randomized controlled study” [Human Movement Science 96 (2024) 1–10/103253]

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Human Movement Science 医学-神经科学

CiteScore

3.80

自引率

4.80%

发文量

审稿时长

42 days

期刊介绍： Human Movement Science provides a medium for publishing disciplinary and multidisciplinary studies on human movement. It brings together psychological, biomechanical and neurophysiological research on the control, organization and learning of human movement, including the perceptual support of movement. The overarching goal of the journal is to publish articles that help advance theoretical understanding of the control and organization of human movement, as well as changes therein as a function of development, learning and rehabilitation. The nature of the research reported may vary from fundamental theoretical or empirical studies to more applied studies in the fields of, for example, sport, dance and rehabilitation with the proviso that all studies have a distinct theoretical bearing. Also, reviews and meta-studies advancing the understanding of human movement are welcome. These aims and scope imply that purely descriptive studies are not acceptable, while methodological articles are only acceptable if the methodology in question opens up new vistas in understanding the control and organization of human movement. The same holds for articles on exercise physiology, which in general are not supported, unless they speak to the control and organization of human movement. In general, it is required that the theoretical message of articles published in Human Movement Science is, to a certain extent, innovative and not dismissible as just "more of the same."